On Apr 13, 2009, at 11:35 AM, Louis Dina wrote: > Nor do I. Sorry if I gave that impression. I leave my monitor > luminance set to 85-90 cd/m2 all the time. I find that works great > for the most common print display conditions (what I would call > "normal" lighting) and also for proofing for press, etc. Right, and if one wishes to emulate a specific print viewing condition, softproofing, and adjusting the printer profile to reflect the viewing conditions is perhaps the most effective way to flexibly allow this, with fast switching between any set of conditions... > > I don't push this with a religious zeal, but do suggest that if > people find their prints looking dark and muddy, with blocked up > shadows compared to their display, that they try a lower monitor > luminance. Important advice worth being a bit zealous about... its such a common complaint that "my prints are darker than my screen", and yet people are seldom considering the relation between screen brightness and viewing brightness. C. David Tobie Global Product Technology Manager Digital Imaging & Home Theater CDTobie@... ---------- Datacolor www.datacolor.com/Spyder3 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Monitor Luminance
2009-04-13 by C D Tobie
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.