It's funny how throughout history the only truly massive spurts of innovation came coupled with a culture of openness, sharing, and a general lack of monetary and business thought. Tesla and electricity, the internet, etc. If only this was true in the printing world. We would have epson 11880- type heads in Roland-quality printers with ink-systems derived from the medical industry and onboard linux boxes (for the controllers) running open-source but with millions of public dollars going to advanced head technology and LUT tuning. Imagine if Epson screening was open-source. Imagine how far that would propel the print industry if we widened the thinking from 20 engineers at Epson Inc. to 20,000. Imagine if we had a hardware product like the Eric Blossom's boards for software-defined GNU radio with the HIGHEST quality open source driver in the world that could print any width we built it and take any paper we threw at it. (And imaging if it was a flat-table printer, no paper bending, just suction under the print head.) Its time for some brilliant mechanical/robotic engineers to step up and build the starting blocks of such a system. If we did this, the printing world would change for the better and forever. Open source modularized hardware is were we must head. We have been stalled at the margins technically for years (in this country) in a controlled upgrade pattern while big companies with lots of patents suck our wallets dry. It started in the 80s with refrigerators and now it's everywhere. All epson has to do each year is add a channel and some nozzles, flip their magenta ink from more-magenta to more-red and back, mess with their cartridge pressure, and call it "technically improved." We all just sprint to get the new printer because our old ones have crappy issues that epson surely new about (3800 rollers, 9600 inkline pressure, o-rings, CF motor errors, vacuum clogs, etc) but decided to only fix one upgrade at a time in order to maximize profit and oversell the public. Apple recently TOOK OUT the firewire port from the new MacBooks because they realized you could do Final Cut pro on a cheap MacBook just as well as on the MacBook pros. While this was an obvious thing, the behind the scenes "planned degrading" is much larger. We must break that business cycle. It should be illegal and is hurting our economy. If Cone can re-engineer color ink for epsons with a few chemists and some hutzpa to the point where we don't even need to re- profile our papers, Epson can surely build a printer that does not clog . . . . ever. It's in the hardware. Not the ink. Walker [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Is this a "conspiracy theory" ?
2009-04-14 by Walker Blackwell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.