Digital BW, The Print

Walker Blackwell <forums@...> wrote:

> ...
> Another model might be non-profit hardware supported by the 
> open-source community ...

In a sense -- and abstracting a bit -- that's what we are on this forum.

> ... This takes out a  lot of R and D costs, ...

A community of free speakers probably does lower costs.  I've heard it said humans are compulsive communicators.  Maybe this trait has evolved because it, among other things, lowers costs.  


> A real study of available parts should be done ...

In a sense, this forum and communities like it also contribute there.  Some of the "parts" we put together include the elements of our workflows, including where to find the inks, printers and related parts needed for B&W digital printing. 

> ... Find some form of legal idea structure so things discussed
> here  stay open-source and available to anyone.

In the U.S., its Constitutional "First Amendment" is the ultimate issue.  (I do not speak as a legal expert here.)  I think free speech is fundamental to a knowledge-based society, and that is the essence of the US 1st Amendment.  

> A bare-bones print engine might be cost effective ...

Yes.  QTR is.


>... Imagine that. Manual printers of the highest  
> quality for people  ...

Actually, I think the we're doing rather well.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com