I agree Tyler. Good work is good work, yet buyers are continually encouraged to make their decisions on technology rather than craft and results. Yes, technology matters, but it's not what people should be taught to focus on. When I want to make real silver prints from a digital file, I make a large format negative on my LVT and print it on conventional enlargers and I doubt if anyone could tell the difference between my print and the one from the Durst at any viewing distance. I know this because I actually make prints this way for a well known photographer who was buying digital silver prints and even he couldn't justify the added cost of the digital hyped print. The rare exception would be mural sized prints, assuming there's enough resolution in the capture for it to show a difference. There are many ways to build a good print. Whether it's this silver, that silver, this ink or that, if the craft is good, the results are good and the methodology and equipment to get there should be secondary, not the only selling point. BTW, does anyone know if they're processing in a machine or not? Ilford make a specially designed hardened fiber paper for laser imaging and machine processing and I personally don't think it looks as good as the paper we process in trays. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tyler Boley" First of all, I love silver, and I know some people who have had these done, and as another available option I think it's great. But I am tired of some of these preconceptions, they demonstrate lack of knowledge. What makes my ink prints any less "hand crafted" than the silvers prints I was making before? The number of options I have to wade through to get the ink print I want makes for much more involved time, and it's way way more finessed, a better print expression of my image. Once one is done and considered good, I could run off 10 more in the darkroom way faster than I can run off ten more ink prints. There will also be a higher rate of failures in ink, and it's more expensive. These kinds of preconceptions, based on lack of knowledge, need to be corrected. Didn't mean to jump on your post Sarah, it just presented me with another rant opportunity. Anyone making such statements is merely telling me they don't know what they are talking about, not good for them.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: "digital silver imaging" - what do you all think?
2009-04-27 by john castronovo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.