> I then asked my wife which brochure looked best. She picked the MIS UT14-C print. Why? The blacks are better. > > In looking at the 2 brochures side by side, and trying to ignore my knowledge of the spectro dmax readings, I think she's right. It looks like the same results that we've seen with matte v. glossy. The reflections off the more glossy HP-PK surface block the technically higher dmax from being seen in normal viewing. The lower gloss MIS coating looks blacker due to relatively lower reflections. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com Wasn't that discussed before :-) The practical value of the highest Dmax if it relies on the gloss factor. My question about the Eboni 2% was not correctly phrased I think. It wasn't about the ink channels it occupies but where it ranks in a quad set: LLK or LK. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst New: Dinkla Canvas Wrap Actions | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
Message
Re: [Digital BW] MIS UT14-C v. HP-PK
2009-05-28 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.