Digital BW, The Print

"Joost Horsten" <j.h.j.h@...> wrote:

>...I'm a bit puzzled. You have designed the warm and cool 
> toners (LK and LLK) of the UT3D such that they can offset
> one another, as I have used successfully in my 2200. 
> So if I just would re-use those inks that should be fine. Or not?

Maybe I'm not understanding how you'll want to use the inks.  The 3D LK and LLK are basically neutral versions of normally warm LK and LLK.  The idea of the 3D versions was to have as little impact on the very low target gamut target area of the 3D inkset as possible.  I did not intend then to be toners.  

If you've been using them successfully already, then by all means continue to do so.
 
> Maybe I'm wrongfully assuming that the warm UT3D toners 
>(LK and LLK) are similar (perhaps even identical) to the 
> standard OEM LK and LLK. 

The 3D inkset was made as a hextone inkset -- no LK or LLK.  It worked OK in the 2200 with a neutralized LK, but even that tended to limit the effectiveness of the inkset with the Epson driver. (Frankly, I don't think it ever worked as intended in the 2400 if the Epson driver was used, and one point of the inkset was to make an inkset an RGB color profiling software could control.)

At any rate, the 3D LK and LLK are neutralized versions of LK and LLK. 

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com