My question was worded in such a way as to take an informal survey of the endpoints of people's aesthetic judgments, not to minimize them. My impresssion is that 20x24" may have become the new 16X20". > Although the OP does not want to discuss aesthetics, experiences of others are indeed of little use to take as guideline. As also Jason said, this is an artistic decision to be made by the artist based on intended viewing distance. >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: print size for exhibition
2009-06-18 by Evan Wolarsky