I've been reading this thread with great interest. I do have a question. I generally shoot with Canon SLRs that have a 3x2 format. This makes my preferred print size 12x18 or 16x24, neither of which is a "standard" size. What format are you using? And is the simple solution to achieving "standard" print sizes (e.g. 16x20) merely one of cropping the image? If so, that means the composition of the shot must take into account the cropping requirement and the resulting loss of the full resolution of the sensor size. If my comments are accurate, why do camera makers continue to employ formats that don't match the "standard"? Or am I missing something? Thanks, Fred --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark" <pr_roark@...> wrote: > > > I have 22 x 28 and 16 x 20 image sizes on the wall currently, with mats that are larger, of course. I recently reduced the outside mat/frame size of the largest so that it would fit inside the largest art shipping box the local UPS store carries. Shipping cost and convenience was the main reason to do this... >
Message
Re: print size for exhibition
2009-06-20 by fredila2
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.