While paper cost is an issue, I am used to printing different formats for looks. I'm more concerned with precut matt. *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 6/20/2009 at 4:04 PM fredila2 wrote: >I've been reading this thread with great interest. I do have a question. > >I generally shoot with Canon SLRs that have a 3x2 format. This makes my >preferred print size 12x18 or 16x24, neither of which is a "standard" size. > >What format are you using? And is the simple solution to achieving >"standard" print sizes (e.g. 16x20) merely one of cropping the image? If >so, that means the composition of the shot must take into account the >cropping requirement and the resulting loss of the full resolution of the >sensor size. > >If my comments are accurate, why do camera makers continue to employ >formats that don't match the "standard"? Or am I missing something? > >Thanks, > >Fred >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: print size for exhibition
2009-06-20 by Gary Weaver
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.