I strongly agree with Joost. Even with trying to think about in- camera framing, I've found that almost invariably, my images are improved with post cropping. I almost always finalize the image in whatever aspect ration this crop demands, then balance out with matting. But I'll also matt and frame to nonstandard sizes when it best supports the look of the final package. On Jun 20, 2009, at 9:43 AM, Joost Horsten wrote: > > > To me the aspect ratio of an image is a crucial part of the > composition. I always adapt it to what the image needs and I > sacrifice uniformity. So, often I end up with some non-standard > aspect ratio that I compensate with the matting. > > Joost > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: print size for exhibition
2009-06-20 by Brad Smith
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.