Mark, Might I make a suggestion. I know we are all very technical and scientific on this e-group and you are very technical and scientific about your testing, but reading the results might be a bit confusing or just plain not understandable to the layman. How about a one or two sentence summary at the top of the PDF with your best "down to earth" wording. Perhaps "as of this date I have found the following paper ink combination to be fading fast/slow/not at all" or something like that? Seeing certain numbers going down might be acceptable to some, but others might see it as a big fade issue. I.E... give us your personal feeling. Unscientifically, Mark http://www.stillrivereditions.com On Dec 6, 2009, at 12:06 PM, Walker Blackwell wrote: > Good work Mark. I became a paying member today. Hopefully everyone > here will do the same. > > I would be very interested in seeing data for the Cone Color K3 ink on > Hahn Photo Rag 308 and Museo Portfolio Rag. I can send these samples > from UVM's 4800 printers if others would like to send 4880 and 9880 > samples *using the Cone Color K3 vivid. I haven't seen data yet on > these inks and am really needing to before I feel entirely comfortable > with'em. > > It was good to see the Piezography Portfolio Black under-printing fade > data up there. That was something I was needing confirmation on. > > All the best, > Walker
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Aardenburg Imaging Fade Tests
2009-12-06 by Mark Savoia
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.