Digital BW, The Print

Tyler,
Mark here, lets just call me Savoia for now. OK, this is going to sound insane, but for all the times I have looked at the info on their website I never ever knew of those hidden columns to the right in my browser window. I just never noticed I could scroll right. This is the sound of me hitting forehead with my hand, stupid(slap) - stupid(slap) - stupid(slap). I would just download the PDFs. I guess we get use to most websites either being more of a vertical format or the content would fit left to right automatically. Geez.

OK, now to get back to life within my browsers constraints :) You CAN teach an old dog new tricks.
Savoia

http://www.stillrivereditions.com

On Dec 6, 2009, at 4:13 PM, tboleyyh wrote:

> Mark(1?), I have spent some time with Mark(2?)'s info, very interested at first, then taken over by a lazy ADD type of attitude that never lets me complete his docs. I've decided, until I can commit to it, to use his I*Metric as the main comparison criteria, since it seems the most valid to me. So, all I do is click on that header in the test results chart on line, and it puts all the results in order of performance, very informative. Then, if I need more specific info, I download the specific test's pdf, for example to see what patches were the most problematic in a sample I submitted, etc..
> As much as people want a simple statement- your print will last XX years- it's dangerous to make these unlikely predictions, it's too bad a precident was set long ago that leads to the expectation of such statements, and I think it's wise of Mark(2) to not go there..
> In "An Overview of the AaI&A Conservation Display Ratings" from his site, there is a way to convert his I*Metric rating to a longevity prediction in a given environment.
> We're stuck with wanting to simplify complex information... always a problem...
> At least he gave us neato headers to click and stuff... hehe... hehe... coool...
> Tyler