James, Thank you for this informative post. I've been wasting time on VueScan 7.5 beta all weekend with one problem after another making success unattainable. I managed one scan that proved early on that VueScan was superior for my b/w negs compared to Minolta software. Then VS went out of focus and I haven't been able to get it in focus again. I will now try to download a non-beta version. I've got this dual Firewire/SCSI set-up that allows me to go easily between Minolta and VS software. I am interested in your work-around for Fireware because the SCSI is ridiculously slow. Try 5 minutes for a preview scan. I will try your green channel only trick for my black and white also. I had assumed that my auto-esposure setting didn't work on my scanner. I never got a change in exposure even after holding the shift key down. I will try it again. Frank --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "jlerager" <JLerager@y...> wrote: > Frank and everyone, > > I am scanning on a Minolta Multi-Pro also (which I bought in > November), and am very pleased with it overall, including for > color negative/ conversion to B&W. I'm using a Mac G4, OS 9.1, > 1.12 gigs of ram, B&W output with Cone software and inks on an > Epson 1160. > > I'm using Fuji Superia 200 and 400, the 4-layer Reala-based > "amateur" film, dip and dunk processed. I'm glad to hear the > Portra works also; I can't say which is better, not having used the > Portra. I've also heard that Kodak Supra is supposed to be > optimized for scanning. I have scanned some older Fuji NPH > film, and I agree that it doesn't seem to scan very well with the > Minolta software...it's sharp but grainy, and seems to come out > better with Vuescan software. > > For scanning silver-based B&W film, I've found the Minolta > software, when using the B&W settings, to also be very grainy > looking (when I look at it at 100%, it looks like flecks of black & > silver-grey, and very clumpy). However, I've found that if I scan > silver-based B&W films using the Color Negative setting on the > Minolta software, and then select only for the green channel, I get > excellent results. > > I've also used Vuescan, and the newly completed 7.5 version > does scan well (stay away from the 7.5 betas and 7.4 versions of > VS with the Multi-Pro) - and gives perhaps an even sharper scan > than Minolta's software. On another site, I recently posted > suggested directions for using the firewire Multi Pro (and Minolta > Elite II) with VS 7.5 and Mac OS9.1 - though it is complicated. > > The Minolta scanner/Firewire/Vuescan 7.5 combination works > fine for me. > > Minolta's software is very intuitive and Vuescan is not; I've > needed to do a lot of experimenting to really make VS work for > me. However, I think Minolta's software can be very troublesome > in one area; selection of Black and White end-points on the scan > exposure; a problem than VS does not have. There is a way to at > least partially correct for this in Minolta's software, but it is not > obvious, and is buried in the help files. > > I am posting the Minolta Auto-Exposure workarounds, and my > recommendations for using VS 7.5/Minolta firewire scanner/Mac > OS 9.1, below: > > A. Message about controlling exposure functions with Minolta > software. > > I too have a Minolta Multi-Pro (MMP) and I have loved it since I > bought it in early November. It functions beautifully with both the > Minolta software, and with the new Vuescan 7.5 (non-beta; the > beta versions should be avoided for the MMP). The Minolta > software is very intuitive, but there are two tricks to optimizing it: > 1. After Prescan, do a manual focus before final scan (I get > considerably sharper scans with manual than auto focus). > 2. With some scans, after the prescan, you can potentially > improve your scan by selecting a specific area of the image to > determine the final exposure. This is not so obvious, and > requires using the AE AREA LOCK and AE LOCK buttons, which > are on the prescan tab. The instructions are under the Minolta > help menu (under Auto Exposure). I've clipped & pasted the > instructions: > > AE AREA LOCK > The AE area in auto exposure adjusting mode can be changed > and the exposure of that area is adjusted automatically with this > function. > <How To> > 1. Press the Shift key. The AE area is indicated in line instead > of the cropping area indicated in dashed line. > 2. While pressing down the Shift key, change the AE area. The > operation is the same as that of changing the cropping area > except that the Shift key should be used. > > AE LOCK > AE settings for the current prescan are saved and applied to > subsequent prescan. > <How To> > 1. When a prescan scan is made, the AEL button becomes > available. > 2. Click on the AEL button. > > > > B. Message about Vuescan 7.5/Minolta Firewire Scanner/Mac > OS 9.1: > > For everyone with a Multi Pro wishing to use Vuescan (VS)on a > Mac with OS 9.1. The real VS 7.5 (non-beta) now works and it > works fine (though with occasional crashes; Hamrick may refine > it a little more in future) with the Multi-Pro (and also for the Scan > Elite II). (But don't even try to use any of the beta versions of 7.5, > or 7.4 for that matter; you'll only frustrate yourself and waste a lot > of time.) > > However, there are some tricks to using VS with the Minolta > firewire scanners.... > > 1. All the Minolta files must be removed from the > Systems/Extensions folder. I've made a folder to hold them. > These are: > DS Elite Library > MCM Library > MFSBaseLib2887 > MFSFWDriver > MFSFWExpLoader > MFSFWFamily > MFSLib2887 > > 2. If you use Photoshop, the Minolta Plug-In must be removed > from Photoshop's plug-in folder. > > 3. Then reboot your computer (because you have removed > extensions). > > Note: You will not be able to use Minolta's proprietary scanning > software once the extensions and plug-in it requires are > removed, until you have re-installed them and re-booted again. > > 4. When scanning with Vuescan, I highly recommend that you > close all other programs and devices, including modem, > photoshop, word processor(especially the word processor!), etc. > > 5. I often find that I have to open and close Vuescan several > times until it recognizes the scanner. > > 6. Assign lots of ram/memory to VS - I give it 250 megs. > > Vuescan does work great with the Multi-Pro, once you get it up > and running, and once you learn to use VS effectively (it is not > intuitively easy to use like Minolta's software is). VS does seem > to still have a bug in the cropping function that can make it hard > to select crop areas; I found I had to experiment for awhile before > I could get it to work for me. > > Good luck, and best wishes, > James Lerager > > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "culturalvisions" > <frank@c...> wrote: > > Photolunch crashed while I was uploading my test scans. My > > server changed the proceedure and did not tell me. I wiped out > > most of the site and have to rebuild it. I will send you my scan > > tests if you email me directly. > > > > I have discovered a lot of info on line. Unfortunately, my > > bookmarks are spread out amongst 3 computers so I can't > give > > you easy links to the multitude of sites I have found. One off > the > > top of my head is > > > > http://www.robgalbraith.com > > > > Go to forums>scanners > > > > I have seen comparison tests done with slides that show the > > Minolta to be superior to Nikon or Polaroid. The Minolta looks > > sharper and very clean in the shadows. > > > > Unfortunately for Minolta, on this list, we are interested in B+W. > > My tests with C-41 negative film shows the Nikon to come out > > much cleaner in the shadows and less blown out in the > > highlights. But, the Minolt
Message
Re: [Digital BW] 120 Film Scanners Compared
2002-02-18 by culturalvisions
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.