Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: HDR & B&W

2009-12-22 by steveoshoots

> So far, I do not find them very useful.  My central/main exposure with an auto-bracketing shoot is usually closer to the final contrast I'll want than is a stock HDR. 

I us HDR as I would any other tool/method.

Some disadvantages listed by C.D. Tobie:
> demanding multiple originals, thus a tripod, and a frozen subject matter; reminiscent of the old masters of landscape.

another dis is the misuse and over cooking of images mentioned as well.
If the tool is used with thought and care it can produce -great- images that would be extremely difficult to replicate by hand masking layers. As with any other tool, "hit one button and yur done", is not the proper method. For serious HDR I found PhotoMatix works far better than the Photoshop filter and plan on developing some B&W with HDR over the winter to keep the tool fresh. Here is a link to some of my work
http://www.flickr.com/photos/26192346@N05/sets/72157614958975769/

SteveO

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.