I thought I would mention a few things regarding the inkjet issue, First, as a Board Member for the Palm Beach Photographic Centre, we completed the 5th annual FotoFusion here in Delray Beach, Florida two weeks ago. We had the pleasure of having many of the biggest names in photography attend. Names like Arnold Newman, Joyce Tenneson, Vincent Versache, Ross Whittaker, Robert Farber, Helene Delillo, Michael Kenna, David Michael Kennerly, Darrel Guilin, Barry Haynes, George DeWolfe, Jill Enfield, Rick Sammon, and many many others, Guess what folks? The majority of these people are shooting digital. A Versache 20x24 pigmented color Epson 10000 print sold at our annual auction for $1000. I had two 11"x14" quadtones sell for approx. $400 each. An Arnold Newman and a Ruth Bernard sold for over $2000 each for 8x10 silver prints. A Michael Kenna silver print sold for over $1500. BUT, not many people are Arnold Newmand or Ruth Bernard. Yes, many of these photographers are commercial image makers, but they all do personal work and projects. With over 3000 people attending the workshops, lectures and panel discussions, the digital programs were sold out, the photography programs were well attended but not sold out. We have discontinued all darkroom programs and alternative process programs for lack of interest. Two of our programs that were standing room only were Tom Lopez's digital capture and printing lecture, and George DeWolfes Piezo lecture. Also well arttended were the Adobe Photoshop programs by Barry Haynes and Julianne Kost. Presenter after presenter all had the same theme. Digital is here to stay. Yes we are competing against silver, platinum, bromoil, photogravure, etc. But digital is where it's at. In fact, Vincent Versache started off his lecture by asking how many of of the 300 people in the room were shooting digital. Almost 60% raised their hands. He went on to predict that within 3-5 years there will only be a few very select film emulsions made by the big three left on the market for those rare occassions that film is needed. Ilford, Kodak, and Fuji are all dedicating themselves to digital. For all intents and purposes, the "ONLY" new cameras being introduced on the market (with the exception of Hasselblads candy color 503's) are digitals. What's up with that? Versache is now 100% digital and has not shot film in over 18 months! At the auction, we sold over $25,000 of images to raise money for our (Palm Beach Photographic Centre) "at risk" childrens programs. Of the 125+ prints that sold, I would venture to say that 60-75% were all digitally produced either by capture or by scanning and printing. The digital revolution has only just begun. I met with a gallery owner today who want's to rep my work. He looked at 60 of my 16x20 "Carbon Pigment" images and told me that he was very excited about my work. He did not seem at all phased by the fact that the work was digital. In fact, we discussed the materials I used. I added that I printed with the finest carbon pigments on acid free 100% cotton rag paper. I matt with buffered acid free 100% rag museum board. He had no questions after that with respect to archival issues. My point here is let's not get nuts and panic. The revolution is here and as the years go on acceptance will become easier and easier. Viva La Revolution! Mike Michael J. Kravit Architect/Photographer Boca Raton, Florida
Message
Re: The Difital Revolution - WAS - AIPAD Galleries List
2002-02-19 by Michael Kravit
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.