Digital BW, The Print

You are right, some people do not care (for varied reasons ;-), and yes, a
stunning picture is, well, stunning...no matter what the source...even a
Holga or a Lomo! It also has nothing to do with theory either.

> Is it possible that they simply don't care?
>
> I think that a stunning picture is a stunning picture, irrespective of
> whether all the theoretically obtainable detail is there or not.
>
> On Tuesday 19 Feb 2002 3:34 am, Austin Franklin wrote:
>
> > From what I have observed, people are enthralled with the
> > sharpness/cleanness of digital, and don't notice that the detail isn't
> > there compared to film...and since most people don't compare
> the exact same
> > image side by side, they just don't notice it.