You are right, some people do not care (for varied reasons ;-), and yes, a stunning picture is, well, stunning...no matter what the source...even a Holga or a Lomo! It also has nothing to do with theory either. > Is it possible that they simply don't care? > > I think that a stunning picture is a stunning picture, irrespective of > whether all the theoretically obtainable detail is there or not. > > On Tuesday 19 Feb 2002 3:34 am, Austin Franklin wrote: > > > From what I have observed, people are enthralled with the > > sharpness/cleanness of digital, and don't notice that the detail isn't > > there compared to film...and since most people don't compare > the exact same > > image side by side, they just don't notice it.
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: The Difital Revolution - WAS - AIPAD Galleries List
2002-02-19 by Austin Franklin