Digital BW, The Print

Kevin Gulstene has volunteered to assemble a quadtone FAQ!

Thank you Kevin, I support the method you suggest.

Peter Marquis-Kyle

Kevin, I think the quadtone faq project is a great idea. 

Maybe you could simplify your workflow a little and get more help at the
same time. You wrote

> thoughts. 3. I will pull together the material from the 
> archives or use material already provided by others if they 
> agree, and circulate to the reviewers off list. 4. Publish 
> the document in the files section

Instead of circulating drafts to reviewers off-list, you could just post
the drafts, and post a notice on the list (and CC your "official"
reviewers) with a deadline for comments. You might get some good
suggestions from "unofficial reviewers." All comments could go directly
to you off-list, and you could decide what revisions, if any, to make to
the posted draft.

Just a thought. If you're willing to do the work, you get to decide.

Richard Wolfson
www.rwolfson.com

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Richard Wolfson" <richard@r...> wrote:
> Kevin, I think the quadtone faq project is a great idea. 
> 
> Maybe you could simplify your workflow a little and get more help at the
> same time. You wrote
> 
> > thoughts. 3. I will pull together the material from the 
> > archives or use material already provided by others if they 
> > agree, and circulate to the reviewers off list. 4. Publish 
> > the document in the files section
> 
> Instead of circulating drafts to reviewers off-list, you could just post
> the drafts, and post a notice on the list (and CC your "official"
> reviewers) with a deadline for comments. You might get some good
> suggestions from "unofficial reviewers." All comments could go directly
> to you off-list, and you could decide what revisions, if any, to make to
> the posted draft.
> 
> Just a thought. If you're willing to do the work, you get to decide.
> 
> Richard Wolfson
> www.rwolfson.com
Richard,

Good suggestion.  

That keeps the noise on the list to a minimum and if I removed the requirement for 
"official" reviewers and let the list respond, I wouldn't have to volunteer other 
peoples time too.

On 4/4/02 kevin@... wrote:

>That keeps the noise on the list to a minimum and if I removed the
>requirement for 
>"official" reviewers and let the list respond, I wouldn't have to
>volunteer other 
>peoples time too.  

sounds very good to me

I hope I can contribute

-- 
John Brownlow

http://www.pinkheadedbug.com