Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] tips please -SprintScan120

Re: [Digital BW] tips please -SprintScan120

2002-07-14 by Martin Wesley

Frank,

Right off the bat ask them to upgrade to the current version of Silverfast
for the 120 which is version 5.5.2r20 for Windows, 5.5.2r08 for the Mac OS
or 5.5.2r11 for Mac OS X. These are free upgrades and the 5.5 will be very
important for you. With the 5.2 version you cannot scan directly to 16-bit.
You can only get 16-bit with version 5.2 by doing a raw scan or what
Silverfast refers to as a HDR scan.

So if you are working with Silverfast 5.2, under options set the gamma to
2.2 (to match PS 2.2 grayscale), check the "for HDR output" box, scan
everything to 16-bit HDR Grayscale. Scan at 4000 dpi to get the most info
out of the negs. This will give you raw tiff files that you can edit in
Photoshop. They will look rather compressed but will expand out just fine.

If you have version 5.5 also set the gamma to 2.2 but scan directly to a
16-bit grayscale file and use Silverfast's level's command to set the white
and black points just outside the data range. This will save you time in PS
and will translate the scanners 14-bit data over a broader portion of the
16-bit space of the file. You could use the other functions in Silverfast
but time will be money and you can do the same things later in PS.

The solution to perfect flatness with the 120 is to use the glass carrier.
If it doesn't come with one, I would not be concerned in regard to flatness.
The problem with the medium format carrier and, to a lesser extent, the 35mm
carrier is that they are not full frame. On my medium format negs I lose
about 1mm on the sides. This may vary depending upon the camera you used
since not all camera have the same frame width.

Definitely scan in 16-bit! You can switch down to 8-bit later in the process
but you want to do as much as you can in 16-bit at the start.

As to scanning in grayscale or RGB there is debate. Since you are on the
clock the grayscale route would seem to be the way to go. An RGB file is
three times as big as a grayscale file.

What are they going to charge you to use the scanner and how long is the
"day"? You will probably find that you will use the first day just getting
acquainted with everything. After you have taken your scans home and worked
with them you may find you want to rescan some of them.

Do your math. If you really have a mountain of negs be sure you don't wind
up paying for a substantial portion of a 120 bit by bit.

Also, how will you get your files home? You will need to burn them onto a CD
and this takes time as well. A 4000 dpi grayscale scan of a 6x6 neg will be
about 160 MB so at best you will only be able to get 3, maybe 4 scans on a
single CD.

Of course if this is a rental you can bring home and hook up to your
computer it will be a much better deal or if you have a lap top to take to
the scanner to transfer files.

Martin Wesley

http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html



----- Original Message -----
From: "frankg_photo" <frank@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 2:55 PM
Subject: [Digital BW] tips please -SprintScan120


> I cannot afford to purchase one of these Polaroid 120 film scanners
> but a local photo equip rental house has a unit with Silverfast 5.2
> available to rent on a daily basis - I have a mountain of black &
> white 120 & 35mm negs to scan.
>
> Can you offer any pointers to help me get the very highest quality
> scans possible ?
>
> One thing I searched the archive for but I didn't turn up any
> results  - apparently there is a way of keeping the film flatter
> (particularly the 120 negs) for a sharper result ?
>
> I guess I should scan 16 bit not 8 ? Comments ?
>
> Should I scan in 256 greyscale mode ?
>
> I'm using Photoshop6 & Windows98SE
>
> Thanks
> Frank
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
"flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Re: [Digital BW] tips please -SprintScan120

2002-07-14 by frankg_photo

Martin,
Thank you for the guidance on using the SS120.

I willl be bringing the unit home and hooking it up to my PC 
(Windows98SE) - I have a SCSI card so the hook up should be fairly 
straight forward. Although I agree that the better part of a day will 
be getting it alll straightened out and up to speed. Fortunately, 
they will let me have the unit for a weekend at a one day rate (about 
Canadian$120). I should be able to get a good deal of scanning done 
if I work around the clock :-)
Regarding a few of your comments:
1.Upgrading Silverfast to 5.5
If the supplied CD only has 5.2 - and I install the 5.2  - is the 5.5 
an easy download from the Silverfast site and will it install over 
5.2 or would I need to uninstall first ?
2. RGB vs Greyscale.
If the larger file size and rental time is not a great concern, would 
it be qualitatively (is there such a word :-) be better to scan a B&W 
neg in col ?
3. Raw scan .
You mention that with 5.2 you can only get a raw scan or a HDR scan - 
what does this mean ?
4.Is it better to use the software's controls, or to do the editing 
in PS later and just scan everything at default settings ?
To ask it another way, since I'm scanning a neg and viewing it prior 
to Inverting and seeing a positive in PS, how can I "see" or "know" I 
have a quality scan ?
thanks
Frank


> Frank,
> 
> Right off the bat ask them to upgrade to the current version of 
Silverfast
> for the 120 which is version 5.5.2r20 for Windows, 5.5.2r08 for the 
Mac OS
> or 5.5.2r11 for Mac OS X. These are free upgrades and the 5.5 will 
be very
> important for you. With the 5.2 version you cannot scan directly to 
16-bit.
> You can only get 16-bit with version 5.2 by doing a raw scan or what
> Silverfast refers to as a HDR scan.
> 
> So if you are working with Silverfast 5.2, under options set the 
gamma to
> 2.2 (to match PS 2.2 grayscale), check the "for HDR output" box, 
scan
> everything to 16-bit HDR Grayscale. Scan at 4000 dpi to get the 
most info
> out of the negs. This will give you raw tiff files that you can 
edit in
> Photoshop. They will look rather compressed but will expand out 
just fine.
> 
> If you have version 5.5 also set the gamma to 2.2 but scan directly 
to a
> 16-bit grayscale file and use Silverfast's level's command to set 
the white
> and black points just outside the data range. This will save you 
time in PS
> and will translate the scanners 14-bit data over a broader portion 
of the
> 16-bit space of the file. You could use the other functions in 
Silverfast
> but time will be money and you can do the same things later in PS.
> 
> The solution to perfect flatness with the 120 is to use the glass 
carrier.
> If it doesn't come with one, I would not be concerned in regard to 
flatness.
> The problem with the medium format carrier and, to a lesser extent, 
the 35mm
> carrier is that they are not full frame. On my medium format negs I 
lose
> about 1mm on the sides. This may vary depending upon the camera you 
used
> since not all camera have the same frame width.
> 
> Definitely scan in 16-bit! You can switch down to 8-bit later in 
the process
> but you want to do as much as you can in 16-bit at the start.
> 
> As to scanning in grayscale or RGB there is debate. Since you are 
on the
> clock the grayscale route would seem to be the way to go. An RGB 
file is
> three times as big as a grayscale file.
> 
> What are they going to charge you to use the scanner and how long 
is the
> "day"? You will probably find that you will use the first day just 
getting
> acquainted with everything. After you have taken your scans home 
and worked
> with them you may find you want to rescan some of them.
> 
> Do your math. If you really have a mountain of negs be sure you 
don't wind
> up paying for a substantial portion of a 120 bit by bit.
> 
> Also, how will you get your files home? You will need to burn them 
onto a CD
> and this takes time as well. A 4000 dpi grayscale scan of a 6x6 neg 
will be
> about 160 MB so at best you will only be able to get 3, maybe 4 
scans on a
> single CD.
> 
> Of course if this is a rental you can bring home and hook up to your
> computer it will be a much better deal or if you have a lap top to 
take to
> the scanner to transfer files.
> 
> Martin Wesley
> 
> http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "frankg_photo" <frank@f...>
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y...>
> Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 2:55 PM
> Subject: [Digital BW] tips please -SprintScan120
> 
> 
> > I cannot afford to purchase one of these Polaroid 120 film 
scanners
> > but a local photo equip rental house has a unit with Silverfast 
5.2
> > available to rent on a daily basis - I have a mountain of black &
> > white 120 & 35mm negs to scan.
> >
> > Can you offer any pointers to help me get the very highest quality
> > scans possible ?
> >
> > One thing I searched the archive for but I didn't turn up any
> > results  - apparently there is a way of keeping the film flatter
> > (particularly the 120 negs) for a sharper result ?
> >
> > I guess I should scan 16 bit not 8 ? Comments ?
> >
> > Should I scan in 256 greyscale mode ?
> >
> > I'm using Photoshop6 & Windows98SE
> >
> > Thanks
> > Frank
> >
> >
> >
> > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, 
Polls and
> other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> >
> > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > - Include your full name with your message.
> > - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier 
messages to keep
> them short.
> > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject 
header.
> > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
> "flames."
> > - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
various
> resources on the homepage.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >

Re: [Digital BW] tips please -SprintScan120

2002-07-14 by Martin Wesley

----- Original Message -----
From: "frankg_photo" <frank@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] tips please -SprintScan120


> Martin,
> Thank you for the guidance on using the SS120.
>
> I willl be bringing the unit home and hooking it up to my PC
> (Windows98SE) - I have a SCSI card so the hook up should be fairly
> straight forward. Although I agree that the better part of a day will
> be getting it alll straightened out and up to speed. Fortunately,
> they will let me have the unit for a weekend at a one day rate (about
> Canadian$120). I should be able to get a good deal of scanning done
> if I work around the clock :-)

Great! That is ideal situation and the price sound really reasonable,
especially over a weekend.

> Regarding a few of your comments:
> 1.Upgrading Silverfast to 5.5
> If the supplied CD only has 5.2 - and I install the 5.2  - is the 5.5
> an easy download from the Silverfast site and will it install over
> 5.2 or would I need to uninstall first ?

Download the upgrade and just install that without using the disks.
Silverfast's tech support has always recommended uninstalling previous
versions before installing new ones. To get the upgrade you will need the
serial numbers for Silverfast and Silverfast HDR which should be on the disk
packaging or provided by whoever is renting the unit and the name and
business name. Silverfast will then e-mail you a user name and password to
get the downloads (different one for each). When you start Silverfast and
again when you start Silverfast HDR the program will prompt you for the
serial numbers.

> 2. RGB vs Greyscale.
> If the larger file size and rental time is not a great concern, would
> it be qualitatively (is there such a word :-) be better to scan a B&W
> neg in col ?

Well I develop my negs in a staining pyro developer and scanning in RGB
makes sense to me in this case since I get significantly different
information off each channel, particularly the blue. With a standard B&W neg
I see little difference between the channels and suspect that the difference
has more to do with the scanner than the neg. One of the three channels may
be sharper than the others, probably the blue so that may be of help. This
is probably one you are going to have try for yourself.

> 3. Raw scan .
> You mention that with 5.2 you can only get a raw scan or a HDR scan -
> what does this mean ?

Silverfast 5.2 has lots of controls but only for an 8-bit scan. If you want
16-bit you need to do a raw scan. This is not an issue with version 5.5. A
raw scan is simply the raw data output by the scanner with no manipulation.
Scanners only put out raw data. Everything else that the scanning software
looks like it is doing to the scan is simply a software manipulation of the
raw scanner data either on the fly or done post scanning.

You can make a good argument for just doing raw scans because then you have
exactly the data the scanner produced and can go back and play with it. This
was my method for a long time but I have started to use the Silverfast
controls because sometimes the raw data is compressed into a narrow range in
the 16-bit space close to one end of the range and is very hard to work
with. So I have been setting my end points to make sure things easier in PS.

If you get a scan that is jammed up into the black or white the gamma
setting can be used to move the data back to the center a bit.

> 4.Is it better to use the software's controls, or to do the editing
> in PS later and just scan everything at default settings ?

Well I guess I answered that mostly above. I don't think it makes a quality
difference but doing some work with the scanning software will make the job
in PS easier. Don't try to correct everything in Silverfast, Just make a
first levels adjustment conserving your important black and white points

> To ask it another way, since I'm scanning a neg and viewing it prior
> to Inverting and seeing a positive in PS, how can I "see" or "know" I
> have a quality scan ?

You set Silverfast to transparency and negative. This pops up a "NegaFix"
window that is mostly full of color adjustment files for different films.
There are three boxes in "NegaFix" from top to bottom they should be
<other>, <other> and monochrome. This will give you a positive grayscale
view of your neg on screen so you can see the effects changes made using
Silverfast.

Also check out Ian Lyon's Silverfast Tutorials at:

http://welcome.to/computerdarkroom

A very big help in getting started with the software. The manual is not much
help at all.

Oh, on the "Frame" tab of the main SF control panel and make sure you have
the "Q-factor" set to 1 and the "Filter" box set to None.

Martin
>
>
> > Frank,
> >
> > Right off the bat ask them to upgrade to the current version of
> Silverfast
> > for the 120 which is version 5.5.2r20 for Windows, 5.5.2r08 for the
> Mac OS
> > or 5.5.2r11 for Mac OS X. These are free upgrades and the 5.5 will
> be very
> > important for you. With the 5.2 version you cannot scan directly to
> 16-bit.
> > You can only get 16-bit with version 5.2 by doing a raw scan or what
> > Silverfast refers to as a HDR scan.
> >
> > So if you are working with Silverfast 5.2, under options set the
> gamma to
> > 2.2 (to match PS 2.2 grayscale), check the "for HDR output" box,
> scan
> > everything to 16-bit HDR Grayscale. Scan at 4000 dpi to get the
> most info
> > out of the negs. This will give you raw tiff files that you can
> edit in
> > Photoshop. They will look rather compressed but will expand out
> just fine.
> >
> > If you have version 5.5 also set the gamma to 2.2 but scan directly
> to a
> > 16-bit grayscale file and use Silverfast's level's command to set
> the white
> > and black points just outside the data range. This will save you
> time in PS
> > and will translate the scanners 14-bit data over a broader portion
> of the
> > 16-bit space of the file. You could use the other functions in
> Silverfast
> > but time will be money and you can do the same things later in PS.
> >
> > The solution to perfect flatness with the 120 is to use the glass
> carrier.
> > If it doesn't come with one, I would not be concerned in regard to
> flatness.
> > The problem with the medium format carrier and, to a lesser extent,
> the 35mm
> > carrier is that they are not full frame. On my medium format negs I
> lose
> > about 1mm on the sides. This may vary depending upon the camera you
> used
> > since not all camera have the same frame width.
> >
> > Definitely scan in 16-bit! You can switch down to 8-bit later in
> the process
> > but you want to do as much as you can in 16-bit at the start.
> >
> > As to scanning in grayscale or RGB there is debate. Since you are
> on the
> > clock the grayscale route would seem to be the way to go. An RGB
> file is
> > three times as big as a grayscale file.
> >
> > What are they going to charge you to use the scanner and how long
> is the
> > "day"? You will probably find that you will use the first day just
> getting
> > acquainted with everything. After you have taken your scans home
> and worked
> > with them you may find you want to rescan some of them.
> >
> > Do your math. If you really have a mountain of negs be sure you
> don't wind
> > up paying for a substantial portion of a 120 bit by bit.
> >
> > Also, how will you get your files home? You will need to burn them
> onto a CD
> > and this takes time as well. A 4000 dpi grayscale scan of a 6x6 neg
> will be
> > about 160 MB so at best you will only be able to get 3, maybe 4
> scans on a
> > single CD.
> >
> > Of course if this is a rental you can bring home and hook up to your
> > computer it will be a much better deal or if you have a lap top to
> take to
> > the scanner to transfer files.
> >
> > Martin Wesley
> >
> > http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "frankg_photo" <frank@f...>
> > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y...>
> > Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 2:55 PM
> > Subject: [Digital BW] tips please -SprintScan120
> >
> >
> > > I cannot afford to purchase one of these Polaroid 120 film
> scanners
> > > but a local photo equip rental house has a unit with Silverfast
> 5.2
> > > available to rent on a daily basis - I have a mountain of black &
> > > white 120 & 35mm negs to scan.
> > >
> > > Can you offer any pointers to help me get the very highest quality
> > > scans possible ?
> > >
> > > One thing I searched the archive for but I didn't turn up any
> > > results  - apparently there is a way of keeping the film flatter
> > > (particularly the 120 negs) for a sharper result ?
> > >
> > > I guess I should scan 16 bit not 8 ? Comments ?
> > >
> > > Should I scan in 256 greyscale mode ?
> > >
> > > I'm using Photoshop6 & Windows98SE
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Frank
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks,
> Polls and
> > other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> > >
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> > >
> > > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > > - Include your full name with your message.
> > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier
> messages to keep
> > them short.
> > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject
> header.
> > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
> > "flames."
> > > - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> > > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the
> various
> > resources on the homepage.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
"flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Re: [Digital BW] tips please -SprintScan120

2002-07-14 by frankg_photo

Thanks again.


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Martin Wesley" 
<mwesley250@e...> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "frankg_photo" <frank@f...>
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y...>
> Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 9:01 AM
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] tips please -SprintScan120
> 
> 
> > Martin,
> > Thank you for the guidance on using the SS120.
> >
> > I willl be bringing the unit home and hooking it up to my PC
> > (Windows98SE) - I have a SCSI card so the hook up should be fairly
> > straight forward. Although I agree that the better part of a day 
will
> > be getting it alll straightened out and up to speed. Fortunately,
> > they will let me have the unit for a weekend at a one day rate 
(about
> > Canadian$120). I should be able to get a good deal of scanning 
done
> > if I work around the clock :-)
> 
> Great! That is ideal situation and the price sound really 
reasonable,
> especially over a weekend.
> 
> > Regarding a few of your comments:
> > 1.Upgrading Silverfast to 5.5
> > If the supplied CD only has 5.2 - and I install the 5.2  - is the 
5.5
> > an easy download from the Silverfast site and will it install over
> > 5.2 or would I need to uninstall first ?
> 
> Download the upgrade and just install that without using the disks.
> Silverfast's tech support has always recommended uninstalling 
previous
> versions before installing new ones. To get the upgrade you will 
need the
> serial numbers for Silverfast and Silverfast HDR which should be on 
the disk
> packaging or provided by whoever is renting the unit and the name 
and
> business name. Silverfast will then e-mail you a user name and 
password to
> get the downloads (different one for each). When you start 
Silverfast and
> again when you start Silverfast HDR the program will prompt you for 
the
> serial numbers.
> 
> > 2. RGB vs Greyscale.
> > If the larger file size and rental time is not a great concern, 
would
> > it be qualitatively (is there such a word :-) be better to scan a 
B&W
> > neg in col ?
> 
> Well I develop my negs in a staining pyro developer and scanning in 
RGB
> makes sense to me in this case since I get significantly different
> information off each channel, particularly the blue. With a 
standard B&W neg
> I see little difference between the channels and suspect that the 
difference
> has more to do with the scanner than the neg. One of the three 
channels may
> be sharper than the others, probably the blue so that may be of 
help. This
> is probably one you are going to have try for yourself.
> 
> > 3. Raw scan .
> > You mention that with 5.2 you can only get a raw scan or a HDR 
scan -
> > what does this mean ?
> 
> Silverfast 5.2 has lots of controls but only for an 8-bit scan. If 
you want
> 16-bit you need to do a raw scan. This is not an issue with version 
5.5. A
> raw scan is simply the raw data output by the scanner with no 
manipulation.
> Scanners only put out raw data. Everything else that the scanning 
software
> looks like it is doing to the scan is simply a software 
manipulation of the
> raw scanner data either on the fly or done post scanning.
> 
> You can make a good argument for just doing raw scans because then 
you have
> exactly the data the scanner produced and can go back and play with 
it. This
> was my method for a long time but I have started to use the 
Silverfast
> controls because sometimes the raw data is compressed into a narrow 
range in
> the 16-bit space close to one end of the range and is very hard to 
work
> with. So I have been setting my end points to make sure things 
easier in PS.
> 
> If you get a scan that is jammed up into the black or white the 
gamma
> setting can be used to move the data back to the center a bit.
> 
> > 4.Is it better to use the software's controls, or to do the 
editing
> > in PS later and just scan everything at default settings ?
> 
> Well I guess I answered that mostly above. I don't think it makes a 
quality
> difference but doing some work with the scanning software will make 
the job
> in PS easier. Don't try to correct everything in Silverfast, Just 
make a
> first levels adjustment conserving your important black and white 
points
> 
> > To ask it another way, since I'm scanning a neg and viewing it 
prior
> > to Inverting and seeing a positive in PS, how can I "see" 
or "know" I
> > have a quality scan ?
> 
> You set Silverfast to transparency and negative. This pops up 
a "NegaFix"
> window that is mostly full of color adjustment files for different 
films.
> There are three boxes in "NegaFix" from top to bottom they should be
> <other>, <other> and monochrome. This will give you a positive 
grayscale
> view of your neg on screen so you can see the effects changes made 
using
> Silverfast.
> 
> Also check out Ian Lyon's Silverfast Tutorials at:
> 
> http://welcome.to/computerdarkroom
> 
> A very big help in getting started with the software. The manual is 
not much
> help at all.
> 
> Oh, on the "Frame" tab of the main SF control panel and make sure 
you have
> the "Q-factor" set to 1 and the "Filter" box set to None.
> 
> Martin
> >
> >
> > > Frank,
> > >
> > > Right off the bat ask them to upgrade to the current version of
> > Silverfast
> > > for the 120 which is version 5.5.2r20 for Windows, 5.5.2r08 for 
the
> > Mac OS
> > > or 5.5.2r11 for Mac OS X. These are free upgrades and the 5.5 
will
> > be very
> > > important for you. With the 5.2 version you cannot scan 
directly to
> > 16-bit.
> > > You can only get 16-bit with version 5.2 by doing a raw scan or 
what
> > > Silverfast refers to as a HDR scan.
> > >
> > > So if you are working with Silverfast 5.2, under options set the
> > gamma to
> > > 2.2 (to match PS 2.2 grayscale), check the "for HDR output" box,
> > scan
> > > everything to 16-bit HDR Grayscale. Scan at 4000 dpi to get the
> > most info
> > > out of the negs. This will give you raw tiff files that you can
> > edit in
> > > Photoshop. They will look rather compressed but will expand out
> > just fine.
> > >
> > > If you have version 5.5 also set the gamma to 2.2 but scan 
directly
> > to a
> > > 16-bit grayscale file and use Silverfast's level's command to 
set
> > the white
> > > and black points just outside the data range. This will save you
> > time in PS
> > > and will translate the scanners 14-bit data over a broader 
portion
> > of the
> > > 16-bit space of the file. You could use the other functions in
> > Silverfast
> > > but time will be money and you can do the same things later in 
PS.
> > >
> > > The solution to perfect flatness with the 120 is to use the 
glass
> > carrier.
> > > If it doesn't come with one, I would not be concerned in regard 
to
> > flatness.
> > > The problem with the medium format carrier and, to a lesser 
extent,
> > the 35mm
> > > carrier is that they are not full frame. On my medium format 
negs I
> > lose
> > > about 1mm on the sides. This may vary depending upon the camera 
you
> > used
> > > since not all camera have the same frame width.
> > >
> > > Definitely scan in 16-bit! You can switch down to 8-bit later in
> > the process
> > > but you want to do as much as you can in 16-bit at the start.
> > >
> > > As to scanning in grayscale or RGB there is debate. Since you 
are
> > on the
> > > clock the grayscale route would seem to be the way to go. An RGB
> > file is
> > > three times as big as a grayscale file.
> > >
> > > What are they going to charge you to use the scanner and how 
long
> > is the
> > > "day"? You will probably find that you will use the first day 
just
> > getting
> > > acquainted with everything. After you have taken your scans home
> > and worked
> > > with them you may find you want to rescan some of them.
> > >
> > > Do your math. If you really have a mountain of negs be sure you
> > don't wind
> > > up paying for a substantial portion of a 120 bit by bit.
> > >
> > > Also, how will you get your files home? You will need to burn 
them
> > onto a CD
> > > and this takes time as well. A 4000 dpi grayscale scan of a 6x6 
neg
> > will be
> > > about 160 MB so at best you will only be able to get 3, maybe 4
> > scans on a
> > > single CD.
> > >
> > > Of course if this is a rental you can bring home and hook up to 
your
> > > computer it will be a much better deal or if you have a lap top 
to
> > take to
> > > the scanner to transfer files.
> > >
> > > Martin Wesley
> > >
> > > http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "frankg_photo" <frank@f...>
> > > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y...>
> > > Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 2:55 PM
> > > Subject: [Digital BW] tips please -SprintScan120
> > >
> > >
> > > > I cannot afford to purchase one of these Polaroid 120 film
> > scanners
> > > > but a local photo equip rental house has a unit with 
Silverfast
> > 5.2
> > > > available to rent on a daily basis - I have a mountain of 
black &
> > > > white 120 & 35mm negs to scan.
> > > >
> > > > Can you offer any pointers to help me get the very highest 
quality
> > > > scans possible ?
> > > >
> > > > One thing I searched the archive for but I didn't turn up any
> > > > results  - apparently there is a way of keeping the film 
flatter
> > > > (particularly the 120 negs) for a sharper result ?
> > > >
> > > > I guess I should scan 16 bit not 8 ? Comments ?
> > > >
> > > > Should I scan in 256 greyscale mode ?
> > > >
> > > > I'm using Photoshop6 & Windows98SE
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Frank
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks,
> > Polls and
> > > other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> > > >
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> > > >
> > > > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > > > - Include your full name with your message.
> > > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> > > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier
> > messages to keep
> > > them short.
> > > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the 
subject
> > header.
> > > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks 
or
> > > "flames."
> > > > - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> > > > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and 
the
> > various
> > > resources on the homepage.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, 
Polls and
> other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> >
> > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > - Include your full name with your message.
> > - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier 
messages to keep
> them short.
> > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject 
header.
> > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
> "flames."
> > - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
various
> resources on the homepage.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> >
> >
> >

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.