Re: [Digital BW] Storage interleaving paper
2002-08-30 by Martin Wesley
----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "ungram" <ungram@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 4:51 PM Subject: [Digital BW] Storage interleaving paper > I'm at the point where I need storage boxes. There was a post here > that Lightimpressions catalog now has boxes for 13x19 and 8.5x11. > (Adorama also has these and 11x17). The catalog on p. 51 (Aug) > describes two kinds of paper and tissue. These are buffered and non- > buffered. Which kind would be appropriate for these carbon pigment > prints? I use MIS VM, but it seems all the MIS and Piezo inks would > be similar in their handling requirements. > Andy, A very good question. Without a doubt buffering is good for the long term life of the paper itself. What we do not know is the effect of the buffering on the inks and image stability. Typically buffered interleaving papers have been used with silver gelatin and platinum prints but not with things such as dye transfer prints or textiles that contained dyes. It is well documented that buffering agents actively attack organic dyes. I have not been able to find any reference as the effect of buffering agents on carbon pigment inks. It has been noted that prints on some of the buffered art papers such as Hahnemuhle tend to warm more than those on un-buffered papers such as Epson Archival Matte. There is no data at this point but I am concerned that the buffering agents in the paper may play a role. So if I was to choose a interleaving paper I would go with the un-buffered papers. High quality lignin free un-buffered papers such as those sold by Light Impressions will last for centuries in good storage conditions and hopefully we will have some answers on how best to store our prints before these papers break down. Interleaving is something that can easily be replaced at a later date if needed. For myself I have chosen to go with plastic and all of my final but un-matted prints go into Mylar or polypropylene foldlock sleeves from Light Impressions. Mylar being the first choice. This is more expensive than interleaving but offers greater protection since the print surface does not slide against the cover sheet and makes handling and sorting the prints much easier. I can easily go through 10 to 25 working sheets before I come up with 3 to 5 copies of "keeper" prints so the cost of the sleeves is a small portion of the total print cost. Martin Wesley