[Digital BW] Dilution of blacks? was Nicholas Hartmann's Mono- Ink Print
2001-09-03 by Paul Roark
Rodolpho wrote: >... I always believed ...that the 4-ink sets were done with >1 black and 3 different additions of white ink onto black ink. >If the 3 other inks are simply dilutions, why bother to buy >the sets? Just dilute them yourself, with a >little trial-and-error dilutions, to find the match >that works fine for you - is this (me) too dumb? >Or too much of work for a not-so-good result? The MIS set is just different dilutions of the MIS archival black ink. MIS sells the base so that you can make your own dilutions. Piezo is not that simple. The two lightest inks definitely have some additions; they are not just diluted black. Of course, those additions are where the trouble may be, not just with a dye that separates, but also with the costs. Cone is probably not buying large quantities of black and mixing his own but, rather, paying someone else to do it - for a substantial price. The variable-tone inks, especially the MIS version, are all such that you can mix them yourself. It's just not worth the hassle. Buying them pre-mixed from MIS is a real service that is definitely worth the price. MIS mixes large batches based on weight. Even with syringes, mixing smaller batches turns out to be a source of substantial inconsistencies. The more dilute inks are especially sensitive to tiny variations in the dilution. The mixing is very non-linear, with the lighter inks having amazingly little black ink in them. As such, it's almost impossible to get consistent mixing of small amounts with the tools most of us have and would use. Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com