(no subject)
2002-09-27 by rlsopher
Sorry for the cross-post -I put this on archivalcolor by mistake. My old Random House College Dictionary defines pigment as: A coloring matter or substance; A dry insoluble substance, usually pulverized, that when suspended in a liquid vehicle becomes a paint, ink etc. ... Well.... There are pigments and there are pigments. Some pigments are finely particulate minerals that are for practical purposes both inert and insoluble. Some are particulates derived from an organic source such as cochineal and may tend to be fugitive. Some azo dyes are reasonably "permanent" and others are fugitive (check out a Windsor & Newton or Holbein chart of oil or water colors). Point being that merely being a pigment is no guarantee of permanence and being a dye no guarantee that it will not be more or less permanent. In histochemistry it is common to have a chemical reaction produce an "insoluble" particulate chromophore at the site of the reaction. The "pro-dye/pro-pigment", if you will, is a completely soluble chemical substrate, often uncolored, but becomes a "pigment" under the proper conditions. If dye molecules cross link or polymerize when they are "curing" they can take on the physical characteristics of a pigment and may, or may not be more resistant to the effects of UV etc depending on their chemical structure and they may be insoluble in one vehicle and very soluble in another. I think paint and ink making still has a healthy dollop of witchcraft in it and simplistic claims have to be taken with some degree of skepticism. Objective testing that describes in physical terms (such as delta OD) the effect of time, light and temperature on an ink-paper combination under specified conditions, whether it be pigment, dye or both is to my mind the only real arbiter of permanence. One rub is that there are no generally agreed upon standards of testing for our needs. This leads to our trying to interpolate from study to study and try to make sense of what is somewhat of a muddle. At this point I would be wary of making any firm statements of permanence concerning ink jet produced prints beyond a simple statement that current data suggests that there will be no fading for at least XXX years under specified conditions. To some extent that is even true of traditional silver halide prints since their permanence is largely dependent upon proper archival processing. I have a friend with a couple of prints by Atget that are brown and fading. He has been tempted to try and refix them but then decided to leave well enough alone. The only claim I ever made for silver gelatin prints was they were archivally processed and mounted and matted on acid free board. Roger