Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: Digital Imaging for Photographers

Re: Digital Imaging for Photographers

2002-10-09 by grdglass@aol.com

Andrew,

Thanks for the info on your seminars.  

A couple of weeks ago, you said you were setting up your 2200 and would 
report back to us with a comparison to the larger printer models.  So, what's 
the story?  Can you get "dead nuts neutral" prints?  How's metamerism?

Thanks,
Helene

on 10/8/02 6:40 PM, thedigitaldog at andrew@... wrote:

  
> Folks. . .
> 
> Following our very successful series of seminars in NY, LA & SF, the DIFP 
> i=
> 
> s
> coming to Chicago in October.  This seminar series is specifically created
> to address the needs of high-end advertising and commercial photographers.
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Digital Imaging for Photographers

2002-10-09 by thedigitaldog

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., grdglass@a... wrote:
> A couple of weeks ago, you said you were setting up your 2200 and would 
> report back to us with a comparison to the larger printer models.  So, what's 
> the story?  Can you get "dead nuts neutral" prints?  How's metamerism?

I'm not supposed to say I'm testing an OSX version... It's taking a bit of time but 
yes, I was able to print to the 2200 using the "B&W" mode and the output was 
just what I expected. Very neutral and lovely.

Re: Digital Imaging for Photographers

2002-10-09 by grdglass@aol.com

Andrew Rodney,

Have you tested the PC version? 

Helene


> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., grdglass@a... wrote:
> > A couple of weeks ago, you said you were setting up your 2200 and would 
> > report back to us with a comparison to the larger printer models.  So, 
> what's 
> > the story?  Can you get "dead nuts neutral" prints?  How's metamerism?
> 
> I'm not supposed to say I'm testing an OSX version... It's taking a bit of 
> time but 
> yes, I was able to print to the 2200 using the "B&W" mode and the output 
> was 
> just what I expected. Very neutral and lovely.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Digital Imaging for Photographers

2002-10-10 by thedigitaldog

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., grdglass@a... wrote:
> Andrew Rodney,
> 
> Have you tested the PC version? 
 
Sorry no, I don't do windows.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.