Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] Icefields RIP

Re: [Digital BW] Icefields RIP

2002-10-18 by Mark Savoia

I did and it never made any sense to me. I think it was that old non
graphical layout (put files and list and add printing specs) that got
me.
Mark

photographs42 wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>  There has been a considerable amount of discussion on this and other
> lists about different RIPs and their cost and performance. I have not
> seen anything about Isis Imaging here. A few years ago, when I first
> became interested in Quad Tone printing (before IJM entered the
> picture) I was looking at Isis. At that time they had a product
> called Icefields LT that was reasonably priced (around $50.00 I
> think) and only had two problems for me.
>
> 1. It only worked on a MAC.
> 2. It required a complete Postscript RIP. (The Epson Postscript RIP
> wasn't and still isn't good enough.)
>
> By the time I acquired a MAC System (from my brother who upgraded)
> the LT version had been discontinued and the full version wouldn't
> work on the MAC I had. The full version is $600.00 and as I recall a
> qualified Postscript RIP was around $200.00.
>
> Anyway, I have studied the Postscript language to a degree and it
> always seamed to me to be the best way to control a printer.
>
> Has anyone looked into, or better yet, used the Icefilds software?
>

Re: [Digital BW] Icefields RIP

2002-10-18 by Carolyn Frayn

Jerome wrote:
>> Has anyone looked into, or better yet, used the Icefilds software?

never used it, it's a screening/softproof software... to create screens
(stochastic or halftone) and possibly sep's for output to imagesetter,
direct to plate or film.  I understand they were the first to bring the
issue of quadtone printing on epsons to the public... Personally, I would
think the new RIP's on the market and those coming out for Mac with their
own better dithers, and those we know, would be the way to go.

Carolyn

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.