7500 v. 7600 for B&W
2002-11-24 by Paul Roark
It may be time for me to move on to a 24" printer. It will be for B&W printing only. So, the color ink issues are not of much concern to me. The question is, do I get a 7000, 7500 or 7600? I'm leaning toward either the 7500 or 7600. The 7600 has that extra light black ink, which may be a benefit. On the other hand, who knows how it may react to curves that are designed to control a B&W, probably variable-tone, inkset. I'm a bit skeptical that, at display print size, the 2880 has much benefit. I assume the 7600 is a bit faster. A warranty certainly has some benefit if the alternative 7500 is not under warranty. The chips are a pain, but I'm told empty chipped carts will be here next month. The 7500 would have the advantage of being able to take the Archival inks. While I would not anticipate using the colors for anything other than toning a B&W inkset, the Epson Archival pigments are more light fast than the UltraChromes -- or any other desktop inks. (Can the Archival pigments be used on the 7600? The smaller picoliter heads suggest potential trouble.) Of course, the 7500 would be a bit cheaper to buy initially. I would anticipate making an advanced (meaning more lightfast) version of the neutral-to-sepia inkset for whatever I get. I might base this on PiezoTone midtones, the UC inks, perhaps some Archival inks, or perhaps new inks MIS comes up with. All comments -- including what others might like to see -- are welcomed. For example, are there people who would want a B&W inkset for the 7600 or 7500? Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com