-----Original Message-----
From: Robert [mailto:LA_Native@...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:03 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] D-Max with Ultrachrome Inks - How good?
How rich is the D-Max on a photograph printed from the Epson 2200
supposed to be compared to a true photographic print?
I have two identical prints - one made the traditional wet-process
way, and the other on the Epson 2200 with Enhanced
Matt paper (with the Matt Black cartridge).
The D-max on the wet-processed paper is noticably darker and richer
than the image printed on the Epson. And I know it has nothing to do
with my printer settings -- I've got the blackest blacks my equipment
can produce. The blacks on the Epson print lack punch, and have a
slightly soft charcoal look to them
Everything I've read says that the D-max on Epson 2200s is supposed
to be about as good as from photographs made the old fashioned way,
but in my experience this just isn't so. Am I missing something here?
Isn't the 2200 supposed to be very close to true photographic quality
with the right inks and papers?
Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this
same page.
Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to
keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject
header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
"flames."
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/