Re: 2100/2200 with Ilford galeria smooth pearl
2003-02-05 by Carl Schofield
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tim Robberts <troberts@b...>" <troberts@b...> wrote: > Hi. > > Just a quick question, does anyone know where I can get profiles for > the 2100/2200 with Ilford Galeria Smooth Pearl? I am printing black > and white on this paper with Epsons ultrachrome pigment inks. > > Failing that does anyone have any suggestions for which settings I > should use on the Epson driver? I just tried some of the smooth pearl with the 2200 (UC inks, photo black). I also have no custom profile for this paper so as a first try I used the Pictorico Dualside Photo Paper profile (https://www.pictorico.com/Secure/content/cb.asp?cbid=129) and their suggested workflow for dualside. The surface characteristics of these two papers are somewhat similar (both have a microceramic surface) but the Ilford smooth pearl has more surface sheen. Print characteristics were similar for both the Pictorico dualside and Ilford smooth pearl using the dualside profile. Very nice, deep blacks and minimal bronzing (barely visible only when paper is held at a certain angle to the light source) compared to the Epson luster or semimatte papers which do exhibit severe bronzing. There is of course some metamerism with B&W prints and the UC inks which manifests itself in this case as a slight green cast in daylight, but neutral under incandescent lighting (typical for the all of the Pictorico profiles). I like the surface characteristics and weight of the Ilford Smooth Pearl better than the Pictorico Dualside and also the Ilford paper is not as expensive. I may have to bite the bullet and get IP 5 to get rid of the metamerism problems with the UC inks. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]