Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

UT inks and 1160

UT inks and 1160

2003-09-19 by mediaworks2003

I just got the MIS UT inks and they actually produce a neutral B&W, 
however, the prints I am getting are high contrast, too light and 
media gray where they should be close to dark gray. I have tried 
Paul's UT workflow and curves and, using no curves.

Any suggestions most welcome. It's the first ink I have tried that 
doesn't look brown or purple so I'd love to get the settings right.

Thanks,
Bill

Re: [Digital BW] UT inks and 1160

2003-09-20 by jerry dungan

I installed the UT inks and had the same problem. I kept running nozzel checks that went from ok to almost no ink. Finally occurred to me to make very sure that I had tightly sealed off the top of both cartridges with tape. I redid the tape across the top as a precaution. After quite a few more cleanings  and  nozzle checks to get out all the air bubbles I had introduced, very nice nozzel checks.  And then, viola! My 1160 prints are just as Paul Roark described. Best of luck on this.

mediaworks2003 <centralny121@...> wrote:I just got the MIS UT inks and they actually produce a neutral B&W, 
however, the prints I am getting are high contrast, too light and 
media gray where they should be close to dark gray. I have tried 
Paul's UT workflow and curves and, using no curves.

Any suggestions most welcome. It's the first ink I have tried that 
doesn't look brown or purple so I'd love to get the settings right.

Thanks,
Bill


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT

Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. 




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] UT inks and 1160

2003-09-21 by mediaworks2003

Thanks.

I'll give it a try

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, jerry dungan 
<jerry_4y@y...> wrote:
> I installed the UT inks and had the same problem. I kept running 
nozzel checks that went from ok to almost no ink. Finally occurred 
to me to make very sure that I had tightly sealed off the top of 
both cartridges with tape. I redid the tape across the top as a 
precaution. After quite a few more cleanings  and  nozzle checks to 
get out all the air bubbles I had introduced, very nice nozzel 
checks.  And then, viola! My 1160 prints are just as Paul Roark 
described. Best of luck on this.
> 
> mediaworks2003 <centralny121@h...> wrote:I just got the MIS UT 
inks and they actually produce a neutral B&W, 
> however, the prints I am getting are high contrast, too light and 
> media gray where they should be close to dark gray. I have tried 
> Paul's UT workflow and curves and, using no curves.
> 
> Any suggestions most welcome. It's the first ink I have tried that 
> doesn't look brown or purple so I'd love to get the settings right.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bill
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, 
Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page 
is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you 
wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by 
visiting this same page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages 
to keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject 
header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
flames
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
various resources on the homepage. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
Service. 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: UT inks and 1160

2003-09-21 by Bernie Ess

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "mediaworks2003" 
<centralny121@h...> wrote:
> I just got the MIS UT inks and they actually produce a neutral B&W, 
> however, the prints I am getting are high contrast, too light and 
> media gray where they should be close to dark gray. I have tried 
> Paul's UT workflow and curves and, using no curves.

Hi Bill, I can tell about my experiences as I have gone through the 
same experiences in the last 2-3 days: My first UT prints looked 
awful. It didn't become necessarily visible with nature scenes etc, 
but I printed dozens of portraits, group shots, and the skin tones 
looked really awful, as if the persons were very ill :-)

So I developed and tweaked a "correction curve" that I lay over the 
images before applying Paul's UT curves and after a lot of printing 
and tweaking I finally have managed to get consistent and very nice 
looking prints with neutral and slightly warm prints. For C+3 I 
haven't checked yet, I don't like this tone so far anyway, but I am 
happy to get now prints that look like very fine silver prints and 
are better than anything I have ever seen out of the 1160.

Actually I must say that it is not 1 but 2 curves. After finishing 
the first one I realized that the shadows have become to light so I 
applied a second curve.  

This is not a problem however because while I apply the first curve 
to all prints I have tweaked the second curve to adapt to different 
papers. One for archival matte, one for semigloss and I will try 
other papers. Probably someone who knows a 
little bit about math on the PC could easily combine the 2 curves 
into one. I just dont have time to check that out.

If someone is interested I could send him/ her the curves - also in 
order to know if it works for other setups than my own.

regards Bernie

RE: [Digital BW] Re: UT inks and 1160

2003-09-21 by Daniel Staver

> Probably someone who knows a 
> little bit about math on the PC could easily combine the 2 curves 
> into one. I just dont have time to check that out.

If you want to merge the curves into a single one you can apply them to
a stepwedge, read the RGB value from each patch and input those values
into a new curve. I frequently do this when I create custom correction
curves for the Ultratones in my 2100. 

Only problem is that each curve can hold a maximum of 16 points, so
you'll have to delete some points to make everything fit.

--
Daniel Staver
http://daniel.staver.no

Re: [Digital BW] Re: UT inks and 1160

2003-09-23 by sstormb@aol.com

Thanks for the response. I just saw it.

I'd very much appreciate a copy of the curves. Seems to me that there must be 
something in our setups that doesn't quite work right relative to Paul's and 
others but I have no idea what it might be.

I am using  98 2nd edition with PS 6.

Thanks again.

Bill


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.