Sunday, November 30, 2003, 6:06:04 PM, you wrote:
TB> AHHHH!!!! Life is good. I spent a good part of the day out
TB> in the wind and rain taking pictures of the stormy sea with my 4x5
TB> and real b&w film. A tourist came up (there are ALWAYS tourists
TB> here) with a puzzled look on his face. "Not many of your kind of
TB> photographer left", he said. "It's even worse than that" I said.
TB> "I'm shooting black and white". At that point his expression was
TB> something like "Man, YOU ARE NUTS." He promplty said, "Well, I
TB> guess I better let you get on with your work. My wife and son are
TB> waiting for me in the car." He turned and left.
TB> I don't know what the message is here. But, LIFE IS GOOD in the large format b&w lane.
TB> Tom Baker
That is a good one. Someone last week commented when seeing my
Rolleiflex around my neck, "Wow, I'll be that takes good pictures!" I
said, "Yes, it can. If I don't muck it up!". Then his wife said, "Is
it a digital?" and I replied, "Well, no, it's from 1953." In which
she sort of looked at me like I was nuts. I think she thought I was
being sarcastic.
Here's another good one. In reply to a query about whether B&W film
and traditional process is dead or dying someone on photo.net just said:
"Just my feeling: If you spend a lot of $$ in top notch equipment - camera,
printer, paper, ink, you will be able to make B&W prints that looks quite
decent. But not up to the real thing. And for sure they will last
less."
So, it takes all types....
--
Best regards,
Richard mailto:richard@...