Digital BW, The Print

Hi QTRists,

Here are a couple quick questions

1. I am minutes away from finally putting my UT carts in my 2200 
and I want to make super shure I can exchange the color OEM 
carts and UT carts. The color positions I am taking out still have 
a good amount of color ink in them and I don't want to 
accidentaly waste it. So it is okay isn't it? Also are the color 
cartridges self sealing like the black inks?

2. Carl I am running the beta 9 version of QTR and was 
wondering if your UT beta 8 curves will still work, or at least be a 
good starting place, for beta 9. I know 9 made the most changes 
in relation to the 2200. I also use a 1200 with QTR and the 
change from 8 to 9 appears to have made no difference. Are the 
curves significantly different for the 2200?

Thanks

John Eckenrode

On Tuesday, December 23, 2003, at 06:16  PM, ejohn182002 wrote:

> Hi QTRists,
>
> Here are a couple quick questions
>
> 1. I am minutes away from finally putting my UT carts in my 2200
> and I want to make super shure I can exchange the color OEM
> carts and UT carts. The color positions I am taking out still have
> a good amount of color ink in them and I don't want to
> accidentaly waste it. So it is okay isn't it? Also are the color
> cartridges self sealing like the black inks?
The Epson OEM carts have self sealing poppet valves and are easy to 
store and re-use.  The MIS UT carts for the 2200 do not have self 
sealing valves and they will leak profusely if not re-taped when stored.
>
> 2. Carl I am running the beta 9 version of QTR and was
> wondering if your UT beta 8 curves will still work, or at least be a
> good starting place, for beta 9. I know 9 made the most changes
> in relation to the 2200. I also use a 1200 with QTR and the
> change from 8 to 9 appears to have made no difference. Are the
> curves significantly different for the 2200?
There are new curves included with beta9 for the UC inks, but I haven't 
made any new curves yet for the UT inks under beta9.  Try the old ones 
as a starting point.
>
> Thanks
>
> John Eckenrode

Carl