quadtone / peizography????
2004-03-05 by jerdiakiw
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC
Thread
2004-03-05 by jerdiakiw
What is the difference between quadtone and peizography.. . am I missing something or is the Roark method a different process form peizography . . any advantages of one over the other? jerry in toronto
2004-03-05 by D. Hill
Jerry, Piezography is a brand-name of a complete system of quadtone products and drivers/profiles used with the inks. Piezography = price, excellent quality when it works. Roark = same high quality but with greater flexibility, much more cost effective. The advantage, if you are using UT2, is that you can print an image completely neutral; very similar in tone to an Ilford fiber base paper (or, with controls you can have the look of Agfa warmtone papers). The images print without colorcasts and are tonally smooth. With the same cartridge you can print images using carbon only which imparts a traditional platinum look. Check Paul's site for more information, it also shows a great example of the many print tones available with one cartridge. You can go pretty sepia with this set if you really want to. UT2 is the most superior quadtone product available. And it is extremely fade resistant - so long that it isn't worth mentioning. Just print and smile. Don P.S. Comparative cost of quadtone systems for the 1280: Piezography ICC with CIS, $724.95 (without printer) MIS UT2 with CIS + NEW 1280, $615 --- jerdiakiw <jdiakiw@...> wrote: > What is the difference between quadtone and > peizography.. . > am I missing something or is the Roark method a > different process > form peizography . . any advantages of one over the > other? > jerry in toronto > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you\ufffdre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com
2004-03-05 by hogarth
On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 20:12, jerdiakiw wrote: > What is the difference between quadtone and peizography.. . > am I missing something or is the Roark method a different process > form peizography . . any advantages of one over the other? > jerry in toronto Hello newbie. Quadtone is a term that refers to an inkset that is four different dilutions of the same black ink. Black, dark gray, middle gray, light gray. Piezography is a trade name for a family of quadtone inks from Jon Cone. See: http://www.inkjetmall.com/store/bw/piezographyBW.html Piezography inks are fixed tone inks - each inkset gives you exactly one color. MIS makes both fixed tone and variable tone inks. Their variable tone inks let you choose at print time what color you want your print, from cool tone to sepia. See: http://www.inksupply.com/index.cfm?source=html/bwpage.html Lyson makes both fixed tone and variable tone inks too. All these companies seem to feel obligated to use different terminology, all the better to confuse the customer ;-) Lyson, for example, calls their variable tone inkset "small gamut." Their website uses frames, so you'll have to click on the appropriate links to get there: http://www.lyson.com/includes/frames.html Our esteemed Mr. Rouke works mostly with MIS, and in fact has done a fair amount of research for MIS. The "Rouke method" is indeed a very different process than Piezography. That's enough to get you started - go do some reading, and research the archives from this group and others when you have questions. You almost certainly aren't the first one to ask. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2004-03-05 by Tyler Boley
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, hogarth <hogarth@s...> wrote: > On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 20:12, jerdiakiw wrote: ... > Quadtone is a term that refers to an inkset that is four different > dilutions of the same black ink. Black, dark gray, middle gray, light > gray. May I elaborate a bit? I think the concept has evolved a bit from the original 3000 4 ink printers quads were developed on, next the 1160 printers. They were indeed 4 ink printers, and the scale was partitioned into 4 tonal zones to send to those inks. Now we have 6 and 7 ink systems that to me are still quadtones, because of the technique. For example I have a seven ink printer, and depending on what I want to achieve may use from four up to all seven inks, yet they are still quadtones to me. This is because of the tonal partitioning technique, four tonal areas. Which, or how many, inks I assign to any of those areas is user adjustable. Also, a simple example is what the older Piezograpgy system did with the 6 ink printers, it assigned two ink tanks to the same tonal area, twice, still quadtones. Another example being the Small Gamuts, four inks but no partitioning, not Quadtones. Following that logic, today there are many other systems, some I would refer to as tritones with an additional toner ink, or two. Even more variations on theses approaches are being used. Some don't agree with me, the obvious being the Septone system, named because of seven inks. But they are still partitioned into four tonal areas, and appropriate inks assigned to those areas in ways adjustable by the user. But they choose to call them Septones not Quadtones. Also, offset press clearly calls xxxtones by the number of inks, period. It could be that the Quadtone name has faded into irrelevance, but that's how I keep my head around it. Tyler