Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Another crack at ImagePrint versus StudioPrint

Another crack at ImagePrint versus StudioPrint

2004-11-13 by jay@ariseditions.com

I like a number of other folks am trying to decide between
ImagePrint and StudioPrint. The one missing piece of info for me is
how well StudioPrint is able to produce neutral B&W prints using the
Ultrachrome inks. There is consistent positive feedback on
ImagePrint about it's ability to handle B&W as well as superior
quality on color images. I hear good things about StudioPrint when
it comes to print quality but it's very hard to find a good print
quality comparison between ImagePrint and StudioPrint from a
hardcore hard-to-please observer.

I'd love to hear from anyone that has done or seen any kind of side-
by-side comparison or has any experience printing B&W with
StudioPrint using Ultrachrome inks.

-J-

http://www.ariseditions.com

Re: Another crack at ImagePrint versus StudioPrint

2004-11-13 by Tyler Boley

I am testing a StudioPrint apraoch to B&W with Ultrachromes now. But I
won't be done, and able to report, for a few days at the least. Since
I don't have IP a side by side won't be possible here.
Tyler

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, jay@a... wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> 
> I like a number of other folks am trying to decide between
> ImagePrint and StudioPrint. The one missing piece of info for me is
> how well StudioPrint is able to produce neutral B&W prints using the
> Ultrachrome inks. There is consistent positive feedback on
> ImagePrint about it's ability to handle B&W as well as superior
> quality on color images. I hear good things about StudioPrint when
> it comes to print quality but it's very hard to find a good print
> quality comparison between ImagePrint and StudioPrint from a
> hardcore hard-to-please observer.
> 
> I'd love to hear from anyone that has done or seen any kind of side-
> by-side comparison or has any experience printing B&W with
> StudioPrint using Ultrachrome inks.
> 
> -J-
> 
> http://www.ariseditions.com

Re: Another crack at ImagePrint versus StudioPrint

2004-11-14 by john dean

You know Tyler, this is exactly what a lot of us out here are more than curious about. The 
talk in the past was that you couldn't do tone chanel linerizaton as well with Studio Print, 
right? That's why you bought a PC in ther first place to use Imageprint with quads? 

It seems that with ultrachromes the first thing you want to do is shut off the yellow 
channel, which is the pigment most likely to fade and cause metamerism, right? Then what 
happens?, you desaturate the other color channels and balance them out?, or cut them off 
altogether and print out ot two black channels?

I just suggested the QTR rip for a friend with a 2200 and he was very happy with the 
neutral monochromes that he is now getting to use in his ad book. I want to see those  
this week. 

It seems to me a decent rip along with a printer specific profile curve might be the answer 
for using ultrachrome for serious work. I guess that is what Nash Editions is doing

John


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> I am testing a StudioPrint apraoch to B&W with Ultrachromes now. But I
> won't be done, and able to report, for a few days at the least. Since
> I don't have IP a side by side won't be possible here.
> Tyler
> 
> -

Re: Another crack at ImagePrint versus StudioPrint

2004-11-14 by john dean

I'm sorry, I meant you were using Studio Print with a pc.


The bottom line is - which RIP of them all is superior for making monochrome profiles 
with ultrachrome inks. About the time someone figures that all out, Epson will come up 
with some bullshit quad set, and act like they invented it. Regardless, I believe you should 
be able to make some pretty decently neutral prints with the 4000 and a good rip.

Re: Another crack at ImagePrint versus StudioPrint

2004-11-14 by Tyler Boley

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean"
<deanwork2003@y...> wrote:
> 
> You know Tyler, this is exactly what a lot of us out here are more
than curious about. The 
> talk in the past was that you couldn't do tone chanel linerizaton as
well with Studio Print, 
> right? That's why you bought a PC in ther first place to use
Imageprint with quads? 

Absolutely the reverse. I use StudioPrint. Linearization ability is
great, no matter how you assign ink tanks to channels, including quads.

> It seems that with ultrachromes the first thing you want to do is
shut off the yellow 
> channel, which is the pigment most likely to fade and cause
metamerism, right?

That seems to be a bit of a list myth. Yellow is used least if any,
for the neutral to cold options because it's not needed, since the UC
K and light K inks are warm to begin with and used all the way up the
scale. If you want warmer than UC Ks can do, yellow is introduced.
Carl posted some info that showed the C and M inks actually more
metameric than the yellow.
There are any number of ways to do this, but if you want warmer
tinting ability, you will not turn Y off even though you may limit it
a lot. It simply won't be used unless necessary.

> Then what 
> happens?, you desaturate the other color channels and balance them
out?, or cut them off 
> altogether and print out ot two black channels?

Assuming you have StudioPrint's control, you may limit the color inks,
or use the light components only. Additionally you may also limit
them. It depends on how much toning ability you want.

> I just suggested the QTR rip for a friend with a 2200 and he was
very happy with the 
> neutral monochromes that he is now getting to use in his ad book. I
want to see those  
> this week. 
> 
> It seems to me a decent rip along with a printer specific profile
curve might be the answer 
> for using ultrachrome for serious work. I guess that is what Nash
Editions is doing

The last Nash B&W prints I saw were clearly normal color UC prints
with good profiles for neutrality. That may have changed more recently.
Even with the above scenario, good (and specifically made) profiles
will be necessary. The advantage of QTR is that a light K to K split
can be done, and then specific amounts of "toner" inks can be added
for neutrality or tinting, then the whole thing linearized overall.
With a RIP like StudioPrint, final neutrality and gradation has to be
accomplished with a profile made with carefully selected K generation
and ink limit. So far here, it's trial and error.
By the way, my understanding is that the new version of StudioPrint
comes with pre configured environments for this very purpose. I know
they nailed it some time ago, it's not that hard if you have the
knowledge and toys they have.
Tyler

Re: Another crack at ImagePrint versus StudioPrint

2004-11-14 by Tyler Boley

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean"
<deanwork2003@y...> wrote:
> ... I believe you should 
> be able to make some pretty decently neutral prints with the 4000
and a good rip.

See this post-
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EpsonWideFormat/message/52909

Tyler

Re: Another crack at ImagePrint versus StudioPrint

2004-11-14 by Tyler Boley

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley"
<tyler@t...> wrote:
...
> By the way, my understanding is that the new version of StudioPrint
> comes with pre configured environments for this very purpose. I know
> they nailed it some time ago, it's not that hard if you have the
> knowledge and toys they have.
> Tyler

Or ImagePrint, or Colorburst, or...
Attempting to be PC is such a burden.
Tyler

Re: Another crack at ImagePrint versus StudioPrint

2004-11-17 by jay@ariseditions.com

Hi Tyler, I was wondering if you've made any progress on B&W prints 
with StudioPrint and Ultrachromes <g>.

-J-

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" 
<tyler@t...> wrote:
> 
> I am testing a StudioPrint apraoch to B&W with Ultrachromes now. 
But I
> won't be done, and able to report, for a few days at the least. 
[snip...]

Re: Another crack at ImagePrint versus StudioPrint

2004-11-17 by Tyler Boley

Not quite there yet with v10, been too busy. v11 demo on the way which
should be better anyway.
Tyler

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, jay@a... wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> Hi Tyler, I was wondering if you've made any progress on B&W prints 
> with StudioPrint and Ultrachromes <g>.
> 
> -J-
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" 
> <tyler@t...> wrote:
> > 
> > I am testing a StudioPrint apraoch to B&W with Ultrachromes now. 
> But I
> > won't be done, and able to report, for a few days at the least. 
> [snip...]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.