OT posts WAS Optimizing Images for the Web
2004-12-21 by sandersm@aol.com
In a message dated 12/21/04 10:48:04 AM, Phil Rose writes: > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Phil Rose" > <pjrose@f...> wrote: > > > > Instead, we might wish to consider what is the best way to optimize > > our _posting_ for relevence to digital B&W **prints** and > > **printing**. Please excuse the harsh tone, but I've been "biting my > > tongue" for weeks as the frequency of off-topic posting has increased > > considerably here. > > BTW, Steve, I didn't intend to imply that you had been particularly > involved in past OT posting. This threead just happened to be the one > finally took me "over the edge". > > Phil > > Phil, the only thing worse than an OT post is a poster posting personal apologies to one OT poster about rants about OT posts. This belongs offlist, and since you felt it important to chastise the list for the same sin, please don't make yourself a part of the problem. Sanders McNew www.mcnew.net [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]