Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

OT posts WAS Optimizing Images for the Web

OT posts WAS Optimizing Images for the Web

2004-12-21 by sandersm@aol.com

In a message dated 12/21/04 10:48:04 AM, Phil Rose writes:


> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Phil Rose"
> <pjrose@f...> wrote:
> >
> > Instead, we might wish to consider what is the best way to optimize
> > our _posting_ for relevence to digital B&W **prints** and
> > **printing**. Please excuse the harsh tone, but I've been "biting my
> > tongue" for weeks as the frequency of off-topic posting has increased
> > considerably here.
> 
> BTW, Steve, I didn't intend to imply that you had been particularly
> involved in past OT posting. This threead just happened to be the one
> finally took me "over the edge".
> 
> Phil
> 
> 

Phil, the only thing worse than an OT post is a poster posting personal 
apologies to one OT poster about rants about OT posts.   This belongs offlist, and 
since you felt it important to chastise the list for the same sin, please 
don't make yourself a part of the problem.

Sanders McNew
www.mcnew.net


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.