Premium Semi-Gloss/Matte comparison??
2005-01-07 by evanj1969
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC
Thread
2005-01-07 by evanj1969
i typically print on Epson Premium Semi-Gloss with MIS FSN & PK, but am interested in trying Premium Semi-Matte. since it only comes in rolls that i'd have to cut, and can cost a bit, can anyone offer a comparison of the two? (D-max, brightness, finish, bronzing, longevity, etc....) can one use Photo K with it, or is Matte K or Eboni required? thanks evan
2005-01-07 by Paul Roark
Evan,
> i typically print on Epson Premium Semi-Gloss with MIS FSN & PK,
>but am interested in trying Premium Semi-Matte.
>...can anyone offer a comparison of the two?
Looking the the test strips I recently did on the 7500 with the UT-FSN+
inkset, which uses a combined MIS PK and dark gray to generate the black
these the are relative results I see:
D-max -- Semimatte has the edge.
Brightness -- The white C, M, Y, Visual Density readings are:
PSM: .04, .03, .02, .04
PSG: .06, .05, .03, .05
So, Semigloss is a bit more cyan, but Semimatte is a bit brighter.
Wilhelm claims PSG has no brighteners and PSM does.
Finish -- Semimatte has a finer-grained texture
Bronzing -- Semimatte wins.
Longevity -- Wilhelm lists both as having a dark storage of ">200 years."
My acid test pen suggests PSG is more highly buffered inside. The fade
results seem to generally favor PSG, but it depends on the conditions. See
http://www.wilhelm-research.com/epson/SP4000.html
Photo K is required for both papers.
Hope this helps.
Paul
www.PaulRoark.com2005-01-07 by evanj1969
so is the Dmax basically the same on each paper? in real world applications (hanging on my wall), would i see any difference in the longevity? if i may ask paul, which one do you prefer? just trying to see if i want to spend $90-$100 on a roll, not knowing what to expect. i like a matte surface, but semi-gloss (on my 1280) is much shaper i think. (maybe it just "seems" that way due to the Dmax). i also prefer the brighter surface of the semi-gloss, not to mention the much deeper blacks. i've been using it pre UT/UC but HAD to spray it with Lyson print guard. i guess i want my cake and eat it to. evan --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > Evan, > > > > i typically print on Epson Premium Semi-Gloss with MIS FSN & PK, > >but am interested in trying Premium Semi-Matte. > > >...can anyone offer a comparison of the two? > > Looking the the test strips I recently did on the 7500 with the UT- FSN+ > inkset, which uses a combined MIS PK and dark gray to generate the black > these the are relative results I see: > > D-max -- Semimatte has the edge. > > Brightness -- The white C, M, Y, Visual Density readings are: > PSM: .04, .03, .02, .04 > PSG: .06, .05, .03, .05 > So, Semigloss is a bit more cyan, but Semimatte is a bit brighter. > Wilhelm claims PSG has no brighteners and PSM does. > > Finish -- Semimatte has a finer-grained texture > > Bronzing -- Semimatte wins. > > Longevity -- Wilhelm lists both as having a dark storage of ">200 years." > My acid test pen suggests PSG is more highly buffered inside. The fade > results seem to generally favor PSG, but it depends on the conditions. See
> http://www.wilhelm-research.com/epson/SP4000.html > > Photo K is required for both papers. > > Hope this helps. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com
2005-01-07 by Paul Roark
Evan, >so is the Dmax basically the same on each paper? It's a bit more on PSM, but after I spray them, both are fine. > in real world applications (hanging on my wall), would i see any >difference in the longevity? I have not tested it, but I doubt you'd see any difference. > if i may ask paul, which one do you prefer? I like the lower bronzing of the PSM. I like the lack of OBAs and perhaps better lightfastness of the PSG. Paul www.PaulRoark.com --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > Evan, > > > > i typically print on Epson Premium Semi-Gloss with MIS FSN & PK, > >but am interested in trying Premium Semi-Matte. > > >...can anyone offer a comparison of the two? > > Looking the the test strips I recently did on the 7500 with the UT- FSN+ > inkset, which uses a combined MIS PK and dark gray to generate the black > these the are relative results I see: > > D-max -- Semimatte has the edge. > > Brightness -- The white C, M, Y, Visual Density readings are: > PSM: .04, .03, .02, .04 > PSG: .06, .05, .03, .05 > So, Semigloss is a bit more cyan, but Semimatte is a bit brighter. > Wilhelm claims PSG has no brighteners and PSM does. > > Finish -- Semimatte has a finer-grained texture > > Bronzing -- Semimatte wins. > > Longevity -- Wilhelm lists both as having a dark storage of ">200 years." > My acid test pen suggests PSG is more highly buffered inside. The fade > results seem to generally favor PSG, but it depends on the conditions. See > http://www.wilhelm-research.com/epson/SP4000.html > > Photo K is required for both papers. > > Hope this helps. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links