Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: Better Storage, was Better Scans

Re: Better Storage, was Better Scans

2001-11-17 by grdglass@aol.com

Carolyn,

Is your rationale for that speed or something else?

Helene

> I think I'll go for the IDE's for storage/ backup  and the Ultra SCSI for a
> photoshop scratch disk...
> 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Better Storage, was Better Scans

2001-11-17 by Carolyn Frayn

Helene,

I always thought that the ultra SCSI were best for Photoshop work (the
scratch disk reads and writes and wears down cheap hard drives), and I know
they have a faster transfer rate.  But as I was looking into this last night
I read on the apple site that the ultra SCSI's are also the ones to use for
RAID configurations.  IDE (ATA) are cheap, ultra SCSI's are not.

I definately want the Ultra SCSI for photoshop, but for the RAID? I don't
know yet... more research is in order.


<http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore.woa/233/wo/4pM6
2v8LmGubSli6E/2.7.0.3.30.1>

Carolyn
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Is your rationale for that speed or something else?
> 
> 
>> I think I'll go for the IDE's for storage/ backup  and the Ultra SCSI for a
>> photoshop scratch disk...
>>

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Better Storage, was Better Scans

2001-11-17 by ternahan

I use SCSI hard drives now...they have been good to me. I also have my
scanners - LS2000 and Uma 2400 on a SCSI chain.
That G 4 dual processor sure sounds nice...
t
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> From: Carolyn  Frayn <carolyn@...>
> Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 14:30:19 -0700
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Better Storage, was Better Scans
> 
> Helene,
> 
> I always thought that the ultra SCSI were best for Photoshop work (the
> scratch disk reads and writes and wears down cheap hard drives), and I know
> they have a faster transfer rate.  But as I was looking into this last night
> I read on the apple site that the ultra SCSI's are also the ones to use for
> RAID configurations.  IDE (ATA) are cheap, ultra SCSI's are not.
> 
> I definately want the Ultra SCSI for photoshop, but for the RAID? I don't
> know yet... more research is in order.
> 
> 
> <http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore.woa/233/wo/4pM6
> 2v8LmGubSli6E/2.7.0.3.30.1>
> 
> Carolyn
> 
> 
>> Is your rationale for that speed or something else?
>> 
>> 
>>> I think I'll go for the IDE's for storage/ backup  and the Ultra SCSI for a
>>> photoshop scratch disk...
>>> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other
> resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
> resources on the homepage.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
>

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Better Storage, was Better Scans

2001-11-17 by Carolyn Frayn

I have SCSI drives in my old mac... always good to me too.  My SCSI chain
never worked well for me. I determine which scanner I'll need and plug it up
to the computer, then reboot... Same for the CD burner, get's boring but my
data is not lost.  Looking forward to a G4 or G5 tower.  I've been using the
G4 powerbook for Photoshop, fast enough most of the time but I need a bigger
monitor. 

Are you getting the dual?

C
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> I use SCSI hard drives now...they have been good to me. I also have my
> scanners - LS2000 and Uma 2400 on a SCSI chain.
> That G 4 dual processor sure sounds nice...
> t
>

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Better Storage, was Better Scans

2001-11-17 by ternahan

i have until 12-31 to decide and get the $500 monitor rebate....looking for
best price...
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> From: Carolyn  Frayn <carolyn@...>
> Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 15:11:48 -0700
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Better Storage, was Better Scans
> 
> I have SCSI drives in my old mac... always good to me too.  My SCSI chain
> never worked well for me. I determine which scanner I'll need and plug it up
> to the computer, then reboot... Same for the CD burner, get's boring but my
> data is not lost.  Looking forward to a G4 or G5 tower.  I've been using the
> G4 powerbook for Photoshop, fast enough most of the time but I need a bigger
> monitor. 
> 
> Are you getting the dual?
> 
> C
> 
>> I use SCSI hard drives now...they have been good to me. I also have my
>> scanners - LS2000 and Uma 2400 on a SCSI chain.
>> That G 4 dual processor sure sounds nice...
>> t
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other
> resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
> resources on the homepage.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
>

Re(2): [Digital BW] Re: Better Storage, was Better Scans

2001-11-17 by Cort Anderson

Here are some thoughts on better storage options.

There are some good Firewire storage options available for external
storage. I have seen at least one Firewire RAID and another external
system that can hold up to one terabyte of drives. I have not looked at
the transfer speeds of IDE vs Firewire vs SCSI lately but Firewire is
definitely something to look into.

For backing up large amounts of data the best way is to use tape, the
tapes can easily be stored off site, and should be, for added security.
There are a variety of tape drives available, each with their own pros/
cons so do some research before deciding which one. If you have never
used a tape drive before beware that they are slow and finding data on a
tape can be time consuming. While they do hold massive amounts of data
they are best used for backing up in case of problems where you would
want to restore all the data at once rather than archiving where you are
looking for individual files.

What about DVD as an alternative to CDs? Some of the new G4s come with
the super drive that can burn DVDs and external burners are also
available. It seems that this may be a good alternative to CDs.

Sorry if some of this is a little late, it took awhile to get caught up
on the two days of posts I missed while on the road.

cort anderson
www.trwheels.com

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.