Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Back to basics

Back to basics

2001-11-18 by djcook50@yahoo.com

I'm interested in hearing from anyone who's found a good workflow for 
the original MIS Quadtone inks, specifically using the Epson 1200 
printer.  I've tried the various workflows posted on the MIS site, 
but have experienced limited success - posterization, dots, etc.

The Chris Brandin workflow provides the most continuous tone look, 
but highlights tend to burn out.  The other workflows seem to result 
in excess dots in the lighter areas.  I've experimented with Epson 
Photo paper, Epson Matte Heavyweight, and Somerset Photo Enhanced.

It seems everytime I get what I think is a good workflow for one 
image, I try it with another image and typically get posterized 
results.  It seems I'm just wasting ink and paper.

Anyone using the Epson 1200 and original MIS Quadtones successfully?

Also, is there anyone who's made the switch to Piezography using the 
1200 with satisfactory results?  This seems to be the direction I'm 
heading.

I'm much more interested in making excellent B&W prints than 
continually tweaking and testing.

Thanks,
David

Re: [Digital BW] Back to basics

2001-11-19 by Joseph Glasgow

--- djcook50@... wrote:
> I'm interested in hearing from anyone who's found a
> good workflow for 
> the original MIS Quadtone inks, specifically using
> the Epson 1200 .> 
> Anyone using the Epson 1200 and original MIS
> Quadtones successfully?
> > Also, is there anyone who's made the switch to
> Piezography using the > 1200 with satisfactory
results?  This seems to be
> the direction I'm 
> heading.
> 
> I'm much more interested in making excellent B&W
> prints than 
> continually tweaking and testing.
> 
> Thanks,
> David  

     I am working with piezography software and an
Epson 1200 printer. I like the ease of the software 
and the excellent tonal range of the prints. But the
ugly green cast of the finished product is
unacceptable. This green cast appears with every paper
that I have tried from the cone tech sample pack.  the
green cast of my prints in no way resembles the color
cast of the free sample print that I received from the
inkjetmall in the mail. I would like to say that all
is well with Piezography but it is not.

                    joe
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com

Re: [Digital BW] Back to basics

2001-11-20 by djcook50@yahoo.com

Thanks for the feedback Joe.

Too bad the piezography system is disappointing.  Do you get the 
green cast results with all papers you've tried?

Prior to the piezography system did you have any luck with other inks 
and workflows?

Dave


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Joseph Glasgow 
<joeglas3@y...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> --- djcook50@y... wrote:
> > I'm interested in hearing from anyone who's found a
> > good workflow for 
> > the original MIS Quadtone inks, specifically using
> > the Epson 1200 .> 
> > Anyone using the Epson 1200 and original MIS
> > Quadtones successfully?
> > > Also, is there anyone who's made the switch to
> > Piezography using the > 1200 with satisfactory
> results?  This seems to be
> > the direction I'm 
> > heading.
> > 
> > I'm much more interested in making excellent B&W
> > prints than 
> > continually tweaking and testing.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > David  
> 
>      I am working with piezography software and an
> Epson 1200 printer. I like the ease of the software 
> and the excellent tonal range of the prints. But the
> ugly green cast of the finished product is
> unacceptable. This green cast appears with every paper
> that I have tried from the cone tech sample pack.  the
> green cast of my prints in no way resembles the color
> cast of the free sample print that I received from the
> inkjetmall in the mail. I would like to say that all
> is well with Piezography but it is not.
> 
>                     joe
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
> http://personals.yahoo.com

Re: [Digital BW] Back to basics

2001-11-20 by Martin Wesley

Joe,

Since you already have the Piezo software try a set of MIS Full 
Spectrum cartridges in the 1200 with the Piezo software and see what 
you think. $55 for the set. The side-by-side examples I have seen of 
MIS FS to Piezo with the Piezo driver show none of the green tint in 
the MIS FS print. The FS is more neutral in tone. In other respects 
the prints are very similar but not identical.

Martin Wesley

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Joseph Glasgow 
<joeglas3@y...> wrote:

(snip)
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
>      I am working with piezography software and an
> Epson 1200 printer. I like the ease of the software 
> and the excellent tonal range of the prints. But the
> ugly green cast of the finished product is
> unacceptable. This green cast appears with every paper
> that I have tried from the cone tech sample pack.  the
> green cast of my prints in no way resembles the color
> cast of the free sample print that I received from the
> inkjetmall in the mail. I would like to say that all
> is well with Piezography but it is not.
> 
>                     joe
> >

Re: [Digital BW] Back to basics

2001-11-20 by Steadman Uhlich

It is too bad you see green with your PiezoBW system and that it is a disappointment for you.   

I just framed (12) 11x14 prints today on a variety of papers all made with PiezoBW inks.  Each one is lovely.  No green at all.  Some of the blacks must be seen to be believed because of the richness and depth.  On a few of the images, the skin tones "glow" and contrasted with the black velvety background on a few, the impression is of great texture and depth.    All of these prints have been seen by over a dozen people in different lighting environments and no one sees green at all.  They all comment on the rich tones of grey and the luminous skin and the velvet black which because it is printed on a matte paper...looks like real velvet...not some plasticky RC surface gloss.  

But maybe you just had a little bad luck or a bad printer or bad karma.  

I say this because when or if you get a Piezo system that works, you will not want to switch.  It can be that good. 

Good luck, 

Steadman
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: djcook50@... 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:05 PM
  Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Back to basics


  Thanks for the feedback Joe.

  Too bad the piezography system is disappointing.  Do you get the 
  green cast results with all papers you've tried?

  Prior to the piezography system did you have any luck with other inks 
  and workflows?

  Dave


  --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Joseph Glasgow 
  <joeglas3@y...> wrote:
  > --- djcook50@y... wrote:
  > > I'm interested in hearing from anyone who's found a
  > > good workflow for 
  > > the original MIS Quadtone inks, specifically using
  > > the Epson 1200 .> 
  > > Anyone using the Epson 1200 and original MIS
  > > Quadtones successfully?
  > > > Also, is there anyone who's made the switch to
  > > Piezography using the > 1200 with satisfactory
  > results?  This seems to be
  > > the direction I'm 
  > > heading.
  > > 
  > > I'm much more interested in making excellent B&W
  > > prints than 
  > > continually tweaking and testing.
  > > 
  > > Thanks,
  > > David  
  > 
  >      I am working with piezography software and an
  > Epson 1200 printer. I like the ease of the software 
  > and the excellent tonal range of the prints. But the
  > ugly green cast of the finished product is
  > unacceptable. This green cast appears with every paper
  > that I have tried from the cone tech sample pack.  the
  > green cast of my prints in no way resembles the color
  > cast of the free sample print that I received from the
  > inkjetmall in the mail. I would like to say that all
  > is well with Piezography but it is not.
  > 
  >                     joe
  > > 
  > > 
  > 
  > 
  > __________________________________________________
  > Do You Yahoo!?
  > Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
  > http://personals.yahoo.com


        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
       
       

  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - Include your full name with your message.
  - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
  - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
  - Complete your Yahoo profile.
  - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. 




  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Back to basics

2001-11-20 by Julian Thomas

Steadman, I have to ask, have you seen MIS FS output through the cone
driver? Like Mike K, I think that piezo software is bang on, especially for
4 colour printers, but there are problems with the inks for a growing number
of people. I hope to be moving to a 7000 soon, and I'll be using the piezo
software, but MIS FS inks. One of the things I will be eternally thankfull
to this list for is that it has opened up other possibilities beyond piezo.
Bernd has just sent me his set of prints of comparisons of Piezo with
various other combinations. FS through the Cone driver is 'different' to
piezo, slightly, but  a slight curves tweak would get the same result.
Smooth tones, dotless highlights, the colour of piezo when piezo is on form.
BTW others have said that piezo compresses shadow detail, and I don't see
that. A comparison of the 'stair' image and bernd's print show more visible
detail in the stairs and a dark chimney area in Bernd's print from Piezo,
but this is easily corrected. For 6 colour printers, bernd's print on MIS VM
with a no. 3 curve is truly beautiful.

Julian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steadman Uhlich" <steadmanuhlich@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 5:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Back to basics


> It is too bad you see green with your PiezoBW system and that it is a
disappointment for you.
>
> I just framed (12) 11x14 prints today on a variety of papers all made with
PiezoBW inks.  Each one is lovely.  No green at all.  Some of the blacks
must be seen to be believed because of the richness and depth.  On a few of
the images, the skin tones "glow" and contrasted with the black velvety
background on a few, the impression is of great texture and depth.    All of
these prints have been seen by over a dozen people in different lighting
environments and no one sees green at all.  They all comment on the rich
tones of grey and the luminous skin and the velvet black which because it is
printed on a matte paper...looks like real velvet...not some plasticky RC
surface gloss.
>
> But maybe you just had a little bad luck or a bad printer or bad karma.
>
> I say this because when or if you get a Piezo system that works, you will
not want to switch.  It can be that good.
>
> Good luck,
>
> Steadman
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: djcook50@...
>   To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
>   Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:05 PM
>   Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Back to basics
>
>
>   Thanks for the feedback Joe.
>
>   Too bad the piezography system is disappointing.  Do you get the
>   green cast results with all papers you've tried?
>
>   Prior to the piezography system did you have any luck with other inks
>   and workflows?
>
>   Dave
>
>
>   --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Joseph Glasgow
>   <joeglas3@y...> wrote:
>   > --- djcook50@y... wrote:
>   > > I'm interested in hearing from anyone who's found a
>   > > good workflow for
>   > > the original MIS Quadtone inks, specifically using
>   > > the Epson 1200 .>
>   > > Anyone using the Epson 1200 and original MIS
>   > > Quadtones successfully?
>   > > > Also, is there anyone who's made the switch to
>   > > Piezography using the > 1200 with satisfactory
>   > results?  This seems to be
>   > > the direction I'm
>   > > heading.
>   > >
>   > > I'm much more interested in making excellent B&W
>   > > prints than
>   > > continually tweaking and testing.
>   > >
>   > > Thanks,
>   > > David
>   >
>   >      I am working with piezography software and an
>   > Epson 1200 printer. I like the ease of the software
>   > and the excellent tonal range of the prints. But the
>   > ugly green cast of the finished product is
>   > unacceptable. This green cast appears with every paper
>   > that I have tried from the cone tech sample pack.  the
>   > green cast of my prints in no way resembles the color
>   > cast of the free sample print that I received from the
>   > inkjetmall in the mail. I would like to say that all
>   > is well with Piezography but it is not.
>   >
>   >                     joe
>   > >
>   > >
>   >
>   >
>   > __________________________________________________
>   > Do You Yahoo!?
>   > Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
>   > http://personals.yahoo.com
>
>
>         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>               ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>   Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
>   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
>   Please follow these basic guidelines:
>   - Include your full name with your message.
>   - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
>   - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to
keep them short.
>   - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject
header.
>   - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
"flames."
>   - Complete your Yahoo profile.
>   - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
>   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.