QTR versus IJC/OPM
2005-03-14 by steveh0607
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC
Thread
2005-03-14 by steveh0607
Hello Everyone, For those who have used both QTR and IJC/OPM: What are the Pro's and Con's of each beyond cost? Thanks, Steve
2005-03-14 by Louis Dina
Steve, Both products are fantastic and give the same high quality output. They use the same gimp engine for output, so if you have identical profiles, you should get identical output. I settled on IJC/OPM because I prefer the flexibility, power and user interface for profile creation. It has some neat features that I love. Here is a link to the tutorial if you want more information. http://www.bowhaus.com/contributors/contributor.htm IJC/OPM works with 8 and 16 bit grayscale and RGB images, in TIF, JPG and PSD formats. QTR may also, but I don't remember. IJC/OPM also has a set of sliders, similar to Photoshop's channel mixer, which allows you to adjust RGB images on the fly so you can blend channels for final output. Unlike PS, this feature also has a checkbox that maintains overall luminosity when moving sliders, which is very handy. You can also apply different profiles to different portions of the image using alpha channels, so one part of the image could be neutral B&W, while other portions are cool, warm, sepia, etc. You can apply 7 profiles in a single image using alpha channels. Both programs are excellent. It just depends on how you want to work and the feature set you need. Lou --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "steveh0607" <steveh060758@m...> wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > For those who have used both QTR and IJC/OPM: What are the Pro's and Con's of each
> beyond cost? > > Thanks, > > Steve
2005-03-14 by Mathew DeLillo
Is there any user documentation for QTR? As a new user this will be important as I make my decisions. >-- Original Message -- >To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >From: "Louis Dina" <lbdina@...> >Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:03:52 -0000 >Subject: [Digital BW] Re: QTR versus IJC/OPM >Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > > > >Steve, > >Both products are fantastic and give the same high quality output. >They use the same gimp engine for output, so if you have identical >profiles, you should get identical output. > >I settled on IJC/OPM because I prefer the flexibility, power and user >interface for profile creation. It has some neat features that I >love. Here is a link to the tutorial if you want more information. > >http://www.bowhaus.com/contributors/contributor.htm > >IJC/OPM works with 8 and 16 bit grayscale and RGB images, in TIF, JPG >and PSD formats. QTR may also, but I don't remember. IJC/OPM also >has a set of sliders, similar to Photoshop's channel mixer, which >allows you to adjust RGB images on the fly so you can blend channels >for final output. Unlike PS, this feature also has a checkbox that >maintains overall luminosity when moving sliders, which is very >handy. You can also apply different profiles to different portions >of the image using alpha channels, so one part of the image could be >neutral B&W, while other portions are cool, warm, sepia, etc. You >can apply 7 profiles in a single image using alpha channels. > >Both programs are excellent. It just depends on how you want to work >and the feature set you need. > >Lou > > > >--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "steveh0607" ><steveh060758@m...> wrote: >> >> Hello Everyone, >> >> For those who have used both QTR and IJC/OPM: What are the Pro's >and Con's of each >> beyond cost? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Steve > > > > > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as >they are often being updated. > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, >please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > >Please follow these basic guidelines: >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep >them short. >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, >aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without >notice. >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. >Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, >and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. >See ?Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines? in the Files section: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE ?OWNER? AND ?MODERATORS? >OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, >INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING >BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER >INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE ?OWNER? AND ?MODERATORS? OF DIGITAL BW, THE >PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), >RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS >OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, >THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW,
>THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
2005-03-14 by Mark Carstens
Hey, Lou. I know that you use the PC version of IJC/OPM. Is the slider feature you've described exclusive to the PC version or is it present in the Mac OS X version as well? Thanks! Mark
On Mar 14, 2005, at 6:03 AM, Louis Dina wrote: > IJC/OPM also has a set of sliders, similar to Photoshop's channel > mixer, which > allows you to adjust RGB images on the fly so you can blend channels > for final output. Unlike PS, this feature also has a checkbox that > maintains overall luminosity when moving sliders, which is very > handy. You can also apply different profiles to different portions > of the image using alpha channels, so one part of the image could be > neutral B&W, while other portions are cool, warm, sepia, etc. You > can apply 7 profiles in a single image using alpha channels. > > Both programs are excellent. It just depends on how you want to work > and the feature set you need. > > Lou
2005-03-14 by Seth
QTR is a free DL and trial. Seth ==-----Original Message----- ==From: Mathew DeLillo [mailto:mat@...] == == ==Is there any user documentation for QTR? As a new user this ==will be important as I make my decisions. ==
2005-03-14 by john dean
You can also apply different profiles to different portions > of the image using alpha channels, so one part of the image could be > neutral B&W, while other portions are cool, warm, sepia, etc. You > can apply 7 profiles in a single image using alpha channels. Now that's interesting. Does anyone know if you can have this kind of control for split toning with QTR? I would like to try assigning a cool to the shadows and a warm to the highlights sometime. John
> Both programs are excellent. It just depends on how you want to work > and the feature set you need. > > Lou > >
2005-03-14 by Louis Dina
Mark, The PC version is the latest one. I know Joe Berndt is upgrading the Mac version to incorporate all the features currently present in the PC version, and as is typical, will probably leap frog over the features in the PC version. Not sure if it is complete or not. Best to check with Bowhaus. You can email Joe at software@.... Lou --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Mark Carstens <mathdude5@c...> wrote: > Hey, Lou. > > I know that you use the PC version of IJC/OPM. Is the slider feature > you've described exclusive to the PC version or is it present in the > Mac OS X version as well? > > Thanks! > Mark > > > On Mar 14, 2005, at 6:03 AM, Louis Dina wrote: > > > IJC/OPM also has a set of sliders, similar to Photoshop's channel > > mixer, which > > allows you to adjust RGB images on the fly so you can blend channels > > for final output. Unlike PS, this feature also has a checkbox that > > maintains overall luminosity when moving sliders, which is very > > handy. You can also apply different profiles to different portions > > of the image using alpha channels, so one part of the image could be > > neutral B&W, while other portions are cool, warm, sepia, etc. You > > can apply 7 profiles in a single image using alpha channels. > > > > Both programs are excellent. It just depends on how you want to work
> > and the feature set you need. > > > > Lou
2005-03-14 by mathdude5@comcast.net
Thanks, Lou. I'm on it. Just sent off an email to Joe. Mark
-------------- Original message -------------- > > > Mark, > > The PC version is the latest one. I know Joe Berndt is upgrading the > Mac version to incorporate all the features currently present in the > PC version, and as is typical, will probably leap frog over the > features in the PC version. Not sure if it is complete or not. Best > to check with Bowhaus. You can email Joe at software@.... > > Lou > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2005-03-14 by steveh0607
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Louis Dina" <lbdina@c...> wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed answer Lou. I'll check out the tutorial. > Steve, > > Both products are fantastic and give the same high quality output. > They use the same gimp engine for output, so if you have identical > profiles, you should get identical output. > > I settled on IJC/OPM because I prefer the flexibility, power and user > interface for profile creation. It has some neat features that I > love. Here is a link to the tutorial if you want more information. > > http://www.bowhaus.com/contributors/contributor.htm > > IJC/OPM works with 8 and 16 bit grayscale and RGB images, in TIF, JPG > and PSD formats. QTR may also, but I don't remember. IJC/OPM also > has a set of sliders, similar to Photoshop's channel mixer, which > allows you to adjust RGB images on the fly so you can blend channels > for final output. Unlike PS, this feature also has a checkbox that > maintains overall luminosity when moving sliders, which is very > handy. You can also apply different profiles to different portions > of the image using alpha channels, so one part of the image could be > neutral B&W, while other portions are cool, warm, sepia, etc. You > can apply 7 profiles in a single image using alpha channels. > > Both programs are excellent. It just depends on how you want to work > and the feature set you need. > > Lou > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "steveh0607" > <steveh060758@m...> wrote: > > > > Hello Everyone, > > > > For those who have used both QTR and IJC/OPM: What are the Pro's > and Con's of each > > beyond cost? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Steve
2005-03-15 by Tom OConnell
Does OJP print directly through photoshop using the print command or is it a standalone print application? Is the $249 PC license for one pc? one printer? or one person???? thanks Tom O'Connell
2005-03-15 by Antonis
Tom, OPM is a standalone driver. The license is for one person. It doesn't check your network to see if it is running on other machines. The license doesn't differentiate between a letter size or a 44" wide printer - as long as they are on the list of supported printers. Antonis --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tom OConnell" <tomoc@y...> wrote:
> > Does OJP print directly through photoshop using the print command or > is it a standalone print application? > > Is the $249 PC license for one pc? one printer? or one person???? > > thanks > > Tom O'Connell
2005-03-15 by Antonis
I would like to try assigning a cool to the shadows > and a warm to the highlights sometime. John, you can do that in a profile easily with IJC without the use of alpha channels. I am sure you can put a profile together in QTR as well that does "cross" toning. The purpose of the alpha channel control in the PC version of OPM is for more sophisticated control: you don't need it to assign a color by gray values (i.e. highlight, midtones etc) but by specific image elements. You can mask out an object in the photo and assign a profile to it. You can make a blue sky or a red apple in the middle of a grayscale print if you are using a full cmyk inkset. That kind of thing. Antonis