OS X Tiger and QTR
2005-04-23 by tariqgibranstudio
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC
Thread
2005-04-23 by tariqgibranstudio
Just wanted to warn everyone that QTR does not seem to want to print out of Mac OS X Tiger, at least on a 9600. Even after an un-instal and re-install of QTR. I also lost my SCSI scanner which worked perfect in Panther. So back up everything if movig to Tiger this week or stay in Panther. Tariq
2005-04-23 by Altaf Bhimji
Panther works just fine --- given the kinds software BW people are using - best to probably stay on Panther for another six months at least...(and then plan to take a class at your local community college to get the ed. discount!) altaf
On Apr 23, 2005, at 12:50 PM, tariqgibranstudio wrote: > > > Just wanted to warn everyone that QTR does not seem to want to print > out of Mac OS X > Tiger, at least on a 9600. Even after an un-instal and re-install of > QTR. I also lost my > SCSI scanner which worked perfect in Panther. So back up everything > if movig to Tiger > this week or stay in Panther. > > Tariq >
2005-04-24 by dfaprinting
A friend of mine uses Macs, he said he will not even bother with Tiger until at least three or four updates come out. Might be good advice.
2005-04-24 by Dragonfly Imaging & Printing
Thanks for the heads-up. Maybe it's wise to keep the computer connected to the printer on Panther for a while. I'm looking forward to Tiger, but will probably just try it on a non-critical machine first ;-) Cheers, John Toles www.dragonflyprinting.com
2005-04-25 by tariqgibranstudio
I'm just testing it on another partition myself. Nothing I could use everyday due to compatibility issues. I have also found that there is some strangeness with the way all my SilverFast scanning windows get hidden behind CS when it opens so not only are QTR and my SCSI Epson Scanner not working at all, but SilverFast with my FireWire Film Scanner(Polaroid SprintScan 120) is a little squirly. Tiger is nice but too bad it's breaking everything I actually use! It also has some "bloatware" type apps built into the OS that can't be quit(DashBoard for instance) which slows things down a bit on my Dual G4 1.25. Images take longer to open in CS and there is a slight pause when selecting certain dialog boxes. I'm sure it runs great on Dual G5's though. Tariq --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Dragonfly Imaging & Printing <dragonfly.printing@s...> wrote:
> Thanks for the heads-up. > Maybe it's wise to keep the computer connected to the printer on > Panther for a while. > I'm looking forward to Tiger, but will probably just try it on a > non-critical machine first ;-) > > Cheers, > > John Toles > www.dragonflyprinting.com
2005-04-25 by dfaprinting
> It also has some "bloatware" type apps built into the OS that > can't be quit(DashBoard for instance) which slows things down a bit on my Dual G4 1.25. > Images take longer to open in CS and there is a slight pause when selecting certain dialog > boxes. I'm sure it runs great on Dual G5's though. > > Tariq Lovely bloatware.... must of learned that from Microflaccid. If it wasn't for all the things that slow the machines down, every platform would be incredibly fast. Too bad Apple didn't adopt and fully support the Xwindow system so you could choose how fast you wanted your machine to go (with in reason).
2005-04-25 by Roger Howard
On Apr 25, 2005, at 9:33 AM, dfaprinting wrote: > > >> It also has some "bloatware" type apps built into the OS that >> can't be quit(DashBoard for instance) which slows things down a bit > on my Dual G4 1.25. >> Images take longer to open in CS and there is a slight pause when > selecting certain dialog >> boxes. I'm sure it runs great on Dual G5's though. >> >> Tariq > > > Lovely bloatware.... must of learned that from Microflaccid. If it > wasn't for all the things that slow the machines down, every platform > would be incredibly fast. Too bad Apple didn't adopt and fully support > the Xwindow system so you could choose how fast you wanted your machine > to go (with in reason). Dashboard doesn't slow anything down unless you use it; it's like saying Photoshop slows my machine down. Dashboard, however, can be useful to some, and I've already set to work on some Dashboard widgets for a production environment (for checking job status, and other task info). In my experience with Tiger, it's faster on every piece of hardware I've tested, from 12" iBooks to G5s. Likewise, dialogs are much faster here for me, and I work on G4s only every day (I don't rate a G5 yet :). YMMV, of course. Btw, system updates tend to break poorly developed apps, on all platforms. Sadly, most scanner drivers fall right into this category. If it's a critical production system, you shouldn't be upgrading without some testing anyway - it's easy, throw it on a FW drive and give it a go. Best, Roger
2005-04-25 by dfaprinting
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Roger Howard <rogerhoward@m...> wrote: > > throw it on a FW drive and > give it a go. > > Best, > > Roger I wish windows would boot from a firewire drive. That would truly be a handy feature, along with a couple of the other Mac firewire boot options.
2005-04-26 by tariqgibranstudio
Dashboard is cool, I just don't like that it is built into the OS. When it was Konfabulator before Apple ripped it off, one could choose to have it on or not. Now, it eats up your memory once it is launched. To varify this, just open your activity monitor and you can see that Real Ram is being used by the various apps in Dashboard. The slow dialogs are mainly the printing dialog windows but I noticed a dramatic slowdown in opening images (even small ones) in CS compared to 10.3.8. As far as poorly written software goes, The problem is that Apple apparently changed the way the SCSI driver works in Tiger vs. Panther. They did the exact same thing when Panther came out. Everyone who had perfectly working SCSI devices started having major problems. SilverFast by Lasersoft imaging is some of the best scanning software made by the way. I work on a G3 Powerbook and a Dual G4 daily in my business and use Dual G5's in the class I teach. Besides full 64bit capability which really means nothing at this point as there is no software to take advantage of it yet(not even the new version of Photoshop!), the only real new thing in Tiger is Spotlight and Dashboard and a return to the ability to rotate the screen(ya, we only had that back in OS 9!). Since 10.4.1 is apparently right around the corner, hopefully apple will address SCSI, quartz graphic display issues as well as printing problems right off the bat. Tariq --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Roger Howard <rogerhoward@m...> wrote:
> > On Apr 25, 2005, at 9:33 AM, dfaprinting wrote: > > > > > > >> It also has some "bloatware" type apps built into the OS that > >> can't be quit(DashBoard for instance) which slows things down a bit > > on my Dual G4 1.25. > >> Images take longer to open in CS and there is a slight pause when > > selecting certain dialog > >> boxes. I'm sure it runs great on Dual G5's though. > >> > >> Tariq > > > > > > Lovely bloatware.... must of learned that from Microflaccid. If it > > wasn't for all the things that slow the machines down, every platform > > would be incredibly fast. Too bad Apple didn't adopt and fully support > > the Xwindow system so you could choose how fast you wanted your machine > > to go (with in reason). > > Dashboard doesn't slow anything down unless you use it; it's like > saying Photoshop slows my machine down. Dashboard, however, can be > useful to some, and I've already set to work on some Dashboard widgets > for a production environment (for checking job status, and other task > info). > > In my experience with Tiger, it's faster on every piece of hardware > I've tested, from 12" iBooks to G5s. Likewise, dialogs are much faster > here for me, and I work on G4s only every day (I don't rate a G5 yet > :). YMMV, of course. > > Btw, system updates tend to break poorly developed apps, on all > platforms. Sadly, most scanner drivers fall right into this category. > If it's a critical production system, you shouldn't be upgrading > without some testing anyway - it's easy, throw it on a FW drive and > give it a go. > > Best, > > Roger