Ansel wasn't a god. He wasn't perfect, and didn't claim to be. Far from
it. Why anyone would think he is unerring is beyond me.
Previsualization is a tool that he used to help him decide what to
photograph, how to expose, and how to process so that he could get a
print that he liked from a negative that could produce it. I've never
read that there was a single best print that matched exactly a given
previsualization. Rather, previsualization is a tool that helps you get
a negative that you can print in a range of ways around what you
originally previsualized.
As to the grab shot idea, I would have to say:
"chance favors the prepared mind." -- Louis Pasteur.
Adams was able to successfully make that grab shot because he had been
using his tools of previsualization and the zone system for quite a
while and was fully prepared for the scene around the corner. If he
hadn't previsualized the shot, he probably wouldn't have slammed on the
brakes and slid to a stop.
But this is conjecture. Pity we can't ask him.
--
Bruce Watson
claudej1@... wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> In all fairness to Ansel, Moonrise was a single "grabshot" where he
> didn't
> have time to think and pre-visualize as he might have in his other
> work. He
> also had to intensify the foreground of the negative to match his
> vision of the
> original scene, citing that Moonrise was difficult to print. He talked
> about
> the e-printing his work in his later years with a bolder, deeper,
> darker mood
> and higher contrast than in his earlier days. So post process
> "performance"
> of the score was allowed as "post visualization" in the Zone System.
> Just
> think of what would happen if he had been forced to shoot a Jepeg of
> the
> scene!!
>
> In a message dated 6/15/2005 9:15:01 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com writes:
>
> Considering all the various versions of "Moonrise---" that I've seen
> (printed by AA) I'm not too sure about his unerring pre-visualization.
>
> Ian
>