But in Lexmark, the consumer had an option of receiving a "prebate"
requiring them to return the used cartridge or paying a higher price
and not having the restriction against reuse. I believe that element
of consideration could be deemed necessary for the shrink wrap
restriction to be enforcable.
Bob Michaels
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Ernst Dinkla
<E.Dinkla@c...> wrote:
> No cart chip but a boxwrap
>
>
http://www.corante.com/copyfight/archives/2005/09/
02/the_latest_ip_crime_boxwrap_patent_infringement.php
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
>
> --
> Ernst Dinkla
>
>
> www.pigment-print.com
> ( unvollendet )