Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 3458

Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 3458

2005-10-07 by Ben Ong

Re: Piezography Neutral K7 printing

Hello Carl,

thanks for the response. So you are using the K7's Black in your set up; are 
you happy with the Dmax you are achieving? I'm getting the claimed 1.62 Dmax 
by Cone with K7 on Photorag, but also achieve 1.7 to 1.74 on Photorag with 
Piezotone Selenium + Portfolio Black + StudioPrint 11. There is a very 
noticeable difference to the eye in these two measurements to me, but seems 
like people are generally happy with the product out there???

I am being a bit hard on the product I guess. I shoot 35mm so I'm probably 
not the right candidate to notice a significant increase in smoothness or 
subtle tonal range increases.

Still I think it would have been nice to at least offer a Portfolio Black 
option to those who want it. They did with Piezotones so why not with NK7???

Thanks again. Benny.


   Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 10:38:00 -0400
Show quoted textHide quoted text
   From: Carl Schofield <scho@...>
Subject: Re: Digest Number 3456

I also think that 7 grays are probably not necessary for most
applications and any smoothness gains would be hard to detect on fine
art papers.  I'm using 4 of the neutral k7 grays (including the
black) and the carbon sepia inks in a dual quad setup on my 4000,
driven by QTR.  I'm very pleased with the prints from both inksets.

Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 3458

2005-10-07 by Carl Schofield

The k7 black does not have an outstanding dmax, but I don't find that  
it detracts from image quality.  Some values I've measured with the  
4000 are:   Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Bright White 1.63, Hahnemuhle White  
Velvet 1.61, and Hahnemuhle Photo Rag 1.63.  No reason you can't use  
Portfolio K or any other black ink.  Currently, I'm using the k7  
black as a "shared" black ink for the neutral and carbon sepia quads   
in my 4000.  However, I have an unused slot (PK) that I could (and  
probably will) use for a second black ink.

Carl

On Oct 7, 2005, at 6:37 AM, Ben Ong wrote:

> Re: Piezography Neutral K7 printing
>
> Hello Carl,
>
> thanks for the response. So you are using the K7's Black in your  
> set up; are
> you happy with the Dmax you are achieving? I'm getting the claimed  
> 1.62 Dmax
> by Cone with K7 on Photorag, but also achieve 1.7 to 1.74 on  
> Photorag with
> Piezotone Selenium + Portfolio Black + StudioPrint 11. There is a very
> noticeable difference to the eye in these two measurements to me,  
> but seems
> like people are generally happy with the product out there???
>
> I am being a bit hard on the product I guess. I shoot 35mm so I'm  
> probably
> not the right candidate to notice a significant increase in  
> smoothness or
> subtle tonal range increases.
>
> Still I think it would have been nice to at least offer a Portfolio  
> Black
> option to those who want it. They did with Piezotones so why not  
> with NK7???
>
> Thanks again. Benny.
>
>
>    Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 10:38:00 -0400
>    From: Carl Schofield <scho@...>
> Subject: Re: Digest Number 3456
>
> I also think that 7 grays are probably not necessary for most
> applications and any smoothness gains would be hard to detect on fine
> art papers.  I'm using 4 of the neutral k7 grays (including the
> black) and the carbon sepia inks in a dual quad setup on my 4000,
> driven by QTR.  I'm very pleased with the prints from both inksets.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 3458

2005-10-07 by john dean

I've been thinking over these same issues. Carl I have always liked
the damx of Carbon Sepia with the museum black from a good scan. Would
you say there is a noticeable difference between the earlier inksets
and K7 in the black content? Shouldn't a good linearization take care
of that. Your set up sounds ideal and makes we wonder if I should have
a 7600 just to do what you are doing with the warm and neutral.

Also from past experience, I belive the max black position contributes
 to the final color tone of the entire set doesn't it? If you put
Ebony in there aren't you going to destroy the neutrality this set
represents in the first place and push it toward cooler tones? 

What I would like to do is put Ebony in with the Lyson Cave Paint
color pig inkset in my 10K next week when I set that up. Lyson has
offered to create a matte black for some of us who insist upon it in
order to use that set but it isn't a known quantity like Ebony is. Any
of these combinations have to be linearized to work right.

John



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield
<scho@m...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> The k7 black does not have an outstanding dmax, but I don't find that  
> it detracts from image quality.  Some values I've measured with the  
> 4000 are:   Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Bright White 1.63, Hahnemuhle White  
> Velvet 1.61, and Hahnemuhle Photo Rag 1.63.  No reason you can't use  
> Portfolio K or any other black ink.  Currently, I'm using the k7  
> black as a "shared" black ink for the neutral and carbon sepia quads   
> in my 4000.  However, I have an unused slot (PK) that I could (and  
> probably will) use for a second black ink.
> 
> Carl
> 
> On Oct 7, 2005, at 6:37 AM, Ben Ong wrote:
> 
> > Re: Piezography Neutral K7 printing
> >
> > Hello Carl,
> >
> > thanks for the response. So you are using the K7's Black in your  
> > set up; are
> > you happy with the Dmax you are achieving? I'm getting the claimed  
> > 1.62 Dmax
> > by Cone with K7 on Photorag, but also achieve 1.7 to 1.74 on  
> > Photorag with
> > Piezotone Selenium + Portfolio Black + StudioPrint 11. There is a very
> > noticeable difference to the eye in these two measurements to me,  
> > but seems
> > like people are generally happy with the product out there???
> >
> > I am being a bit hard on the product I guess. I shoot 35mm so I'm  
> > probably
> > not the right candidate to notice a significant increase in  
> > smoothness or
> > subtle tonal range increases.
> >
> > Still I think it would have been nice to at least offer a Portfolio  
> > Black
> > option to those who want it. They did with Piezotones so why not  
> > with NK7???
> >
> > Thanks again. Benny.
> >
> >
> >    Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 10:38:00 -0400
> >    From: Carl Schofield <scho@m...>
> > Subject: Re: Digest Number 3456
> >
> > I also think that 7 grays are probably not necessary for most
> > applications and any smoothness gains would be hard to detect on fine
> > art papers.  I'm using 4 of the neutral k7 grays (including the
> > black) and the carbon sepia inks in a dual quad setup on my 4000,
> > driven by QTR.  I'm very pleased with the prints from both inksets.
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 3458

2005-10-07 by Carl Schofield

John,

Yes, I wouldn't want to substitute another black to use with the  
neutral k7 inks, but I could use another black (museum, eboni, or  
portfolio) with the carbon sepia inks.  I'm not sure yet what I'm  
going to do with the PK slot (currently holds a cleaning cart).  MIS  
PKN for printing BO on epson premium semi-matte (I like this for some  
images) is another option I'm considering.

Carl
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Oct 7, 2005, at 10:26 AM, john dean wrote:

> I've been thinking over these same issues. Carl I have always liked
> the damx of Carbon Sepia with the museum black from a good scan. Would
> you say there is a noticeable difference between the earlier inksets
> and K7 in the black content? Shouldn't a good linearization take care
> of that. Your set up sounds ideal and makes we wonder if I should have
> a 7600 just to do what you are doing with the warm and neutral.
>
> Also from past experience, I belive the max black position contributes
>  to the final color tone of the entire set doesn't it? If you put
> Ebony in there aren't you going to destroy the neutrality this set
> represents in the first place and push it toward cooler tones?
>
> What I would like to do is put Ebony in with the Lyson Cave Paint
> color pig inkset in my 10K next week when I set that up. Lyson has
> offered to create a matte black for some of us who insist upon it in
> order to use that set but it isn't a known quantity like Ebony is. Any
> of these combinations have to be linearized to work right.
>
> John
>
>
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield
> <scho@m...> wrote:
>
>>
>> The k7 black does not have an outstanding dmax, but I don't find that
>> it detracts from image quality.  Some values I've measured with the
>> 4000 are:   Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Bright White 1.63, Hahnemuhle White
>> Velvet 1.61, and Hahnemuhle Photo Rag 1.63.  No reason you can't use
>> Portfolio K or any other black ink.  Currently, I'm using the k7
>> black as a "shared" black ink for the neutral and carbon sepia quads
>> in my 4000.  However, I have an unused slot (PK) that I could (and
>> probably will) use for a second black ink.
>>
>> Carl
>>
>> On Oct 7, 2005, at 6:37 AM, Ben Ong wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Re: Piezography Neutral K7 printing
>>>
>>> Hello Carl,
>>>
>>> thanks for the response. So you are using the K7's Black in your
>>> set up; are
>>> you happy with the Dmax you are achieving? I'm getting the claimed
>>> 1.62 Dmax
>>> by Cone with K7 on Photorag, but also achieve 1.7 to 1.74 on
>>> Photorag with
>>> Piezotone Selenium + Portfolio Black + StudioPrint 11. There is a  
>>> very
>>> noticeable difference to the eye in these two measurements to me,
>>> but seems
>>> like people are generally happy with the product out there???
>>>
>>> I am being a bit hard on the product I guess. I shoot 35mm so I'm
>>> probably
>>> not the right candidate to notice a significant increase in
>>> smoothness or
>>> subtle tonal range increases.
>>>
>>> Still I think it would have been nice to at least offer a Portfolio
>>> Black
>>> option to those who want it. They did with Piezotones so why not
>>> with NK7???
>>>
>>> Thanks again. Benny.
>>>
>>>
>>>    Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 10:38:00 -0400
>>>    From: Carl Schofield <scho@m...>
>>> Subject: Re: Digest Number 3456
>>>
>>> I also think that 7 grays are probably not necessary for most
>>> applications and any smoothness gains would be hard to detect on  
>>> fine
>>> art papers.  I'm using 4 of the neutral k7 grays (including the
>>> black) and the carbon sepia inks in a dual quad setup on my 4000,
>>> driven by QTR.  I'm very pleased with the prints from both inksets.
>>>

RE: [Digital BW] K7 -- Digest Number 3458

2005-10-07 by Paul Roark

> The k7 black does not have an outstanding dmax, ...
> Some values I've measured with the 4000 are:   Hahnemuhle Photo 
> Rag Bright White 1.63, Hahnemuhle White Velvet 1.61, and 
> Hahnemuhle Photo Rag 1.63 ...

Aside from the low dmax, what is the tone of the black -- that is, the full
RGB and Lab readings? 

If the dmax on PhotoRag is that low, I wonder what UltraSmooth/PremierArt
looks like? 

Where the black affects the rest of the image most is from 90% to 100%.  The
cross-over from neutral (or cool) to warm in that range has been a tough
problem to deal with and still have a good dmax.  Luckily, the eye is not
that sensitive to small tone changes in the deep shadows.

My attempts to cool matte blacks with cyan have resulted in what I consider
substandard dmax figures.  Actually, one attraction of the k3 approach to me
is that with a rip I can pour in cyan in the deep shadows and do the best
job yet of reducing the cross-over.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Re: [Digital BW] K7 -- Digest Number 3458

2005-10-07 by Carl Schofield

Paul,

Here are some Lab data for the k7 black (100% patch):

HPR (BW):  L 17.26    a 0.70    b 1.36

Carl
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Oct 7, 2005, at 11:26 AM, Paul Roark wrote:

>> The k7 black does not have an outstanding dmax, ...
>> Some values I've measured with the 4000 are:   Hahnemuhle Photo
>> Rag Bright White 1.63, Hahnemuhle White Velvet 1.61, and
>> Hahnemuhle Photo Rag 1.63 ...
>>
>
> Aside from the low dmax, what is the tone of the black -- that is,  
> the full
> RGB and Lab readings?
>
> If the dmax on PhotoRag is that low, I wonder what UltraSmooth/ 
> PremierArt
> looks like?
>
> Where the black affects the rest of the image most is from 90% to  
> 100%.  The
> cross-over from neutral (or cool) to warm in that range has been a  
> tough
> problem to deal with and still have a good dmax.  Luckily, the eye  
> is not
> that sensitive to small tone changes in the deep shadows.
>
> My attempts to cool matte blacks with cyan have resulted in what I  
> consider
> substandard dmax figures.  Actually, one attraction of the k3  
> approach to me
> is that with a rip I can pour in cyan in the deep shadows and do  
> the best
> job yet of reducing the cross-over.
>
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -------------------- 
> ~-->
> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your  
> home page
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ucIolB/TM
> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ~->
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other  
> resources as they are often being updated.
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you  
> wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by  
> visiting this same page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages  
> to keep them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or  
> flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed  
> from the membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital  
> B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be  
> removed from the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules  
> and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the  
> group Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines”  
> in the Files section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE  
> PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE  
> “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL  
> NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,  
> CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,  
> DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER  
> INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL  
> BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF  
> SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE  
> THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO  
> OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR  
> CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO  
> GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE  
> PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [Digital BW] K7 -- Digest Number 3458

2005-10-07 by Carl Schofield

Forgot to note that these data are from a post linearization scan  
from a 21 step wedge, so there is some gray overlap (darkest gray)   
that may affect the 100% reading.

Carl

On Oct 7, 2005, at 12:19 PM, Carl Schofield wrote:

> Paul,
>
> Here are some Lab data for the k7 black (100% patch):
>
> HPR (BW):  L 17.26    a 0.70    b 1.36
>
> Carl
>
>
> On Oct 7, 2005, at 11:26 AM, Paul Roark wrote:
>
>
>>> The k7 black does not have an outstanding dmax, ...
>>> Some values I've measured with the 4000 are:   Hahnemuhle Photo
>>> Rag Bright White 1.63, Hahnemuhle White Velvet 1.61, and
>>> Hahnemuhle Photo Rag 1.63 ...
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Aside from the low dmax, what is the tone of the black -- that is,
>> the full
>> RGB and Lab readings?
>>
>> If the dmax on PhotoRag is that low, I wonder what UltraSmooth/
>> PremierArt
>> looks like?
>>
>> Where the black affects the rest of the image most is from 90% to
>> 100%.  The
>> cross-over from neutral (or cool) to warm in that range has been a
>> tough
>> problem to deal with and still have a good dmax.  Luckily, the eye
>> is not
>> that sensitive to small tone changes in the deep shadows.
>>
>> My attempts to cool matte blacks with cyan have resulted in what I
>> consider
>> substandard dmax figures.  Actually, one attraction of the k3
>> approach to me
>> is that with a rip I can pour in cyan in the deep shadows and do
>> the best
>> job yet of reducing the cross-over.
>>
>> Paul
>> www.PaulRoark.com



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 3458

2005-10-07 by Tyler Boley

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean"
<deanwork2003@y...> wrote:
>
> ...I have always liked
> the damx of Carbon Sepia with the museum black...

John, the dmax of that setup would be pretty much the same as K7 dmax
reported by users here.
Also, I hate to say it, I would agree with John about mixing up inks
sets. My one experience  doing that killed a print head.
On the other hand, where would we be if none of us were willing to
kill printers?
Tyler

Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 3458

2005-10-07 by john dean

I know. I agree about the dangers of mixed ink formulations.
Especially with something in tonality as carefully worked out as what
we are talking about here.

Secondly I'm very interested in what Crane might have with that new
paper along with a trend that that might set. 

Yea, one murdered printer is enough for me. I'm about to bring one of
mine back to life though, hopefully, and I certainly wouldn't want to
turn around and kill it again.

John
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > ...I have always liked
> > the damx of Carbon Sepia with the museum black...
> 
> John, the dmax of that setup would be pretty much the same as K7 dmax
> reported by users here.
> Also, I hate to say it, I would agree with John about mixing up inks
> sets. My one experience  doing that killed a print head.
> On the other hand, where would we be if none of us were willing to
> kill printers?
> Tyler
>

Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 3458

2005-10-07 by Elwood Spedden

All

My original experience was that I could get only a
DMax of 1.41 on Photo Rag 308 using the curves
supplied with QTR.

I then went to the curve creation tool and simply
bumped the total ink limit from 75 to 80. If I
understand correctly, all seven inks are equally
affected by this control.

I now have a dmax of 1.62 with PR 308 and the richness
of the  deep blacks are much enhanced and the overall
tonality is still great. Is there any problem you know
of with what I have done? If so, any other ideas of
how to get better dmax without simply lifting the
overall ink limit?

Thanks for any help
Woody Spedden

--- john dean <deanwork2003@...> wrote:


---------------------------------
I've been thinking over these same issues. Carl I have
always liked
the damx of Carbon Sepia with the museum black from a
good scan. Would
you say there is a noticeable difference between the
earlier inksets
and K7 in the black content? Shouldn't a good
linearization take care
of that. Your set up sounds ideal and makes we wonder
if I should have
a 7600 just to do what you are doing with the warm and
neutral.

Also from past experience, I belive the max black
position contributes
 to the final color tone of the entire set doesn't it?
If you put
Ebony in there aren't you going to destroy the
neutrality this set
represents in the first place and push it toward
cooler tones? 

What I would like to do is put Ebony in with the Lyson
Cave Paint
color pig inkset in my 10K next week when I set that
up. Lyson has
offered to create a matte black for some of us who
insist upon it in
order to use that set but it isn't a known quantity
like Ebony is. Any
of these combinations have to be linearized to work
right.

John



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com,
Carl Schofield
<scho@m...> wrote:
>
> The k7 black does not have an outstanding dmax, but
I don't find that  
> it detracts from image quality.  Some values I've
measured with the  
> 4000 are:   Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Bright White 1.63,
Hahnemuhle White  
> Velvet 1.61, and Hahnemuhle Photo Rag 1.63.  No
reason you can't use  
> Portfolio K or any other black ink.  Currently, I'm
using the k7  
> black as a "shared" black ink for the neutral and
carbon sepia quads   
> in my 4000.  However, I have an unused slot (PK)
that I could (and  
> probably will) use for a second black ink.
> 
> Carl
> 
> On Oct 7, 2005, at 6:37 AM, Ben Ong wrote:
> 
> > Re: Piezography Neutral K7 printing
> >
> > Hello Carl,
> >
> > thanks for the response. So you are using the K7's
Black in your  
> > set up; are
> > you happy with the Dmax you are achieving? I'm
getting the claimed  
> > 1.62 Dmax
> > by Cone with K7 on Photorag, but also achieve 1.7
to 1.74 on  
> > Photorag with
> > Piezotone Selenium + Portfolio Black + StudioPrint
11. There is a very
> > noticeable difference to the eye in these two
measurements to me,  
> > but seems
> > like people are generally happy with the product
out there???
> >
> > I am being a bit hard on the product I guess. I
shoot 35mm so I'm  
> > probably
> > not the right candidate to notice a significant
increase in  
> > smoothness or
> > subtle tonal range increases.
> >
> > Still I think it would have been nice to at least
offer a Portfolio  
> > Black
> > option to those who want it. They did with
Piezotones so why not  
> > with NK7???
> >
> > Thanks again. Benny.
> >
> >
> >    Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 10:38:00 -0400
> >    From: Carl Schofield <scho@m...>
> > Subject: Re: Digest Number 3456
> >
> > I also think that 7 grays are probably not
necessary for most
> > applications and any smoothness gains would be
hard to detect on fine
> > art papers.  I'm using 4 of the neutral k7 grays
(including the
> > black) and the carbon sepia inks in a dual quad
setup on my 4000,
> > driven by QTR.  I'm very pleased with the prints
from both inksets.
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
>






Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files,
and other resources as they are often being updated.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily
digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your
Membership preferences by visiting this same page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of
earlier messages to keep them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal
attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or
argumentative users may be removed from the membership
without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group
topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently
make off-topic posts may be removed from the
membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the
group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the
actions and decisions of the group Owner and
Moderators. See \ufffdGroup Topic, Rules and Guidelines\ufffd in
the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE
DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY
UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd
OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS,
GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN
IF THE  \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE
PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY
OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE
INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO
GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF
YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR
CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE
PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING
TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.


  
    
---------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

  
    Visit your group "DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint" on
the web.
   
    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
   
    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service.

  
---------------------------------

Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 3458

2005-10-07 by john dean

I'm no expert on this for sure but I assume the adjustable ink limit
feature on the newer version of QTR is created to work this system
through the variation that occurs from printer to printer, sort of a
custom ink load adjustment. I've never had to use it yet. I would also
assume that the darkest inks would be affected more and first.

John
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> All
> 
> My original experience was that I could get only a
> DMax of 1.41 on Photo Rag 308 using the curves
> supplied with QTR.
> 
> I then went to the curve creation tool and simply
> bumped the total ink limit from 75 to 80. If I
> understand correctly, all seven inks are equally
> affected by this control.
> 
> I now have a dmax of 1.62 with PR 308 and the richness
> of the  deep blacks are much enhanced and the overall
> tonality is still great. Is there any problem you know
> of with what I have done? If so, any other ideas of
> how to get better dmax without simply lifting the
> overall ink limit?
> 
> Thanks for any help
> Woody Spedden
> 
> --- john dean <deanwork2003@y...> wrote:
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> I've been thinking over these same issues. Carl I have
> always liked
> the damx of Carbon Sepia with the museum black from a
> good scan. Would
> you say there is a noticeable difference between the
> earlier inksets
> and K7 in the black content? Shouldn't a good
> linearization take care
> of that. Your set up sounds ideal and makes we wonder
> if I should have
> a 7600 just to do what you are doing with the warm and
> neutral.
> 
> Also from past experience, I belive the max black
> position contributes
>  to the final color tone of the entire set doesn't it?
> If you put
> Ebony in there aren't you going to destroy the
> neutrality this set
> represents in the first place and push it toward
> cooler tones? 
> 
> What I would like to do is put Ebony in with the Lyson
> Cave Paint
> color pig inkset in my 10K next week when I set that
> up. Lyson has
> offered to create a matte black for some of us who
> insist upon it in
> order to use that set but it isn't a known quantity
> like Ebony is. Any
> of these combinations have to be linearized to work
> right.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com,
> Carl Schofield
> <scho@m...> wrote:
> >
> > The k7 black does not have an outstanding dmax, but
> I don't find that  
> > it detracts from image quality.  Some values I've
> measured with the  
> > 4000 are:   Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Bright White 1.63,
> Hahnemuhle White  
> > Velvet 1.61, and Hahnemuhle Photo Rag 1.63.  No
> reason you can't use  
> > Portfolio K or any other black ink.  Currently, I'm
> using the k7  
> > black as a "shared" black ink for the neutral and
> carbon sepia quads   
> > in my 4000.  However, I have an unused slot (PK)
> that I could (and  
> > probably will) use for a second black ink.
> > 
> > Carl
> > 
> > On Oct 7, 2005, at 6:37 AM, Ben Ong wrote:
> > 
> > > Re: Piezography Neutral K7 printing
> > >
> > > Hello Carl,
> > >
> > > thanks for the response. So you are using the K7's
> Black in your  
> > > set up; are
> > > you happy with the Dmax you are achieving? I'm
> getting the claimed  
> > > 1.62 Dmax
> > > by Cone with K7 on Photorag, but also achieve 1.7
> to 1.74 on  
> > > Photorag with
> > > Piezotone Selenium + Portfolio Black + StudioPrint
> 11. There is a very
> > > noticeable difference to the eye in these two
> measurements to me,  
> > > but seems
> > > like people are generally happy with the product
> out there???
> > >
> > > I am being a bit hard on the product I guess. I
> shoot 35mm so I'm  
> > > probably
> > > not the right candidate to notice a significant
> increase in  
> > > smoothness or
> > > subtle tonal range increases.
> > >
> > > Still I think it would have been nice to at least
> offer a Portfolio  
> > > Black
> > > option to those who want it. They did with
> Piezotones so why not  
> > > with NK7???
> > >
> > > Thanks again. Benny.
> > >
> > >
> > >    Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 10:38:00 -0400
> > >    From: Carl Schofield <scho@m...>
> > > Subject: Re: Digest Number 3456
> > >
> > > I also think that 7 grays are probably not
> necessary for most
> > > applications and any smoothness gains would be
> hard to detect on fine
> > > art papers.  I'm using 4 of the neutral k7 grays
> (including the
> > > black) and the carbon sepia inks in a dual quad
> setup on my 4000,
> > > driven by QTR.  I'm very pleased with the prints
> from both inksets.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files,
> and other resources as they are often being updated.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily
> digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your
> Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of
> earlier messages to keep them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal
> attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or
> argumentative users may be removed from the membership
> without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group
> topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently
> make off-topic posts may be removed from the
> membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the
> group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the
> actions and decisions of the group Owner and
> Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in
> the Files section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> 
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE
> DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY
> UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS"
> OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE
> LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
> SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING
> BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS,
> GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN
> IF THE  "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE
> PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY
> OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE
> INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO
> GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF
> YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR
> CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING
> TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> 
> 
>   
>     
> ---------------------------------
>   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> 
>   
>     Visit your group "DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint" on
> the web.
>    
>     To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 
> DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>    
>     Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> Terms of Service.
> 
>   
> ---------------------------------
>

Re: [Digital BW] K7 -- Digest Number 3458

2005-10-08 by Ernst Dinkla

Paul Roark wrote:

> My attempts to cool matte blacks with cyan have resulted in what I consider
> substandard dmax figures.  Actually, one attraction of the k3 approach to me
> is that with a rip I can pour in cyan in the deep shadows and do the best
> job yet of reducing the cross-over.

Use a linearisation target with a control on ink bleeding 
then. It could mean a lot of cyan or rather cyan + magenta you 
need there and the black ink amount is already high. There's a 
limit to an overall cool print with the warm carbon based inks 
and the pigmentation of CM inks. A solution would be to go 
back to the two toner blues of the early UT VM but with an 
even higher pigmented blue ink for the shadow range. Even with 
the UT VM on a 9000 and the Wasatch RIP there was a limit in 
how much ink you can use to cool the shadows.

                    --
           Ernst Dinkla


www.pigment-print.com
(         unvollendet         )

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.