Re: [Digital BW] Re: Re: Epson Lawsuit -- MIS
2006-02-25 by Bob Frost
Frank, At the risk of upsetting Keith again, from what I have read it IS a highly creative process to combine many different existing ingredients (and probably make some new ones) to make inks that will work with specific papers (that someone else has created and probably got patents for?) for specific ends. Someone recently posted a reference to some of Epson's patents (or patent applications) on the inks that they have 'invented' - in a discussion of what went into them. I would guess that far more work and creativity goes into making a new ink than taking a photograph! An Hewlett-Packard article not so long ago said it takes about two year's research to produce a new ink. So, should HP, Canon, Epson, etc, who have done such research be protected from others who just copy their inks? So the whole printing system - printer, paper, and ink - involves an enormous amount of creative research. Bob Frost.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Kolwicz" <kolwicz@...> The fact that Epson down-priced it's creative product, the printers, in no way obligates the rest of us to succumb to their transparent attempt to get us to pay for what they didn't invent - over and over and over again. The fact that they didn't charge for their true creativity implies, to me, that they really didn't value it that highly in the first place.