Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Thank you

Thank you

2006-02-27 by l33ry

A big thank you to Paul, Clayton, and the other experts on this forum
who have been so generous with their knowledge and time. I have been
happily printing away into the wee hours on more than one occasion.
I've got my R220 and a set of MIS UT2 EZ neutral, and I have a warm
yellow and gloss black on their way.

Thank you!
Bob
Another newbie up and running, and another convert

P.S. I second the tip about the Library of Congress' growing
collection of digitized scans, not only for the obvious reasons but
for good test and calibration subjects. It's become obvious to me that
my photographic and scanning capability cannot approach the
capabilities of my new printing setup. The excellent large scans of
the more popular photos in the FSA/OWI collection are just the thing.

http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/fsahtml/fahome.html

For the best high-res TIFFs scroll down to the "Popular Requests and
Staff Selections" links. Once you are browsing, do not click on the
thumbnails--click on the catalog number below them. The thumbnails on
those pages will lead you to both low- and high-res scans.

Re: Thank you

2006-02-27 by how786

I second these thanks! Clayton and others are just so darn generous
with their time.
 BTW, does anyone know if MIS is or will be targetted by Epson's law
suits?
 Howard
 


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@...m, "l33ry"
<l33ry@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> A big thank you to Paul, Clayton, and the other experts on this forum
> who have been so generous with their knowledge and time. I have been
> happily printing away into the wee hours on more than one occasion.
> I've got my R220 and a set of MIS UT2 EZ neutral, and I have a warm
> yellow and gloss black on their way.
> 
> Thank you!
> Bob
> Another newbie up and running, and another convert
> 
> P.S. I second the tip about the Library of Congress' growing
> collection of digitized scans, not only for the obvious reasons but
> for good test and calibration subjects. It's become obvious to me that
> my photographic and scanning capability cannot approach the
> capabilities of my new printing setup. The excellent large scans of
> the more popular photos in the FSA/OWI collection are just the thing.
> 
> http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/fsahtml/fahome.html
> 
> For the best high-res TIFFs scroll down to the "Popular Requests and
> Staff Selections" links. Once you are browsing, do not click on the
> thumbnails--click on the catalog number below them. The thumbnails on
> those pages will lead you to both low- and high-res scans.
>

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Thank you

2006-02-28 by Paul Roark

>  BTW, does anyone know if MIS is or will be targetted by Epson's law
> suits?

I have not had many contacts with MIS in this regard, but I think it's cart
supplier claims to not be infringing any Epson patents.  However, what else
would they say in order to sell the carts?  As such, I don't think there is
any way to know or be sure at this time that the MIS supplier won't also be
targeted.  One goal here is to find secure sources for the third party ink
sellers.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Re: Thank you

2006-02-28 by how786

BTW, Onsale.com has the 220 on sale for $69. Shipping only $9.
Epson has several $50 rebate offers on the printer, too.
Best
Howard



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "how786"
<how786@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
>   I second these thanks! Clayton and others are just so darn generous
> with their time.
>  BTW, does anyone know if MIS is or will be targetted by Epson's law
> suits?
>  Howard
>  
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "l33ry"
> <l33ry@> wrote:
> >
> > A big thank you to Paul, Clayton, and the other experts on this forum
> > who have been so generous with their knowledge and time. I have been
> > happily printing away into the wee hours on more than one occasion.
> > I've got my R220 and a set of MIS UT2 EZ neutral, and I have a warm
> > yellow and gloss black on their way.
> > 
> > Thank you!
> > Bob
> > Another newbie up and running, and another convert
> > 
> > P.S. I second the tip about the Library of Congress' growing
> > collection of digitized scans, not only for the obvious reasons but
> > for good test and calibration subjects. It's become obvious to me that
> > my photographic and scanning capability cannot approach the
> > capabilities of my new printing setup. The excellent large scans of
> > the more popular photos in the FSA/OWI collection are just the thing.
> > 
> > http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/fsahtml/fahome.html
> > 
> > For the best high-res TIFFs scroll down to the "Popular Requests and
> > Staff Selections" links. Once you are browsing, do not click on the
> > thumbnails--click on the catalog number below them. The thumbnails on
> > those pages will lead you to both low- and high-res scans.
> >
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.