Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: Comparison of Ultrachrome K3 Advanced B&W and Cone Neutral K7 I

Re: Comparison of Ultrachrome K3 Advanced B&W and Cone Neutral K7 I

2007-01-14 by David Keenan

>then create a black and white profile using QTR
>so you get WYSIWYG printing

In a previous thread there was a discussion about how ABW is a profile-less
workflow.

Perhaps someone who understands this better than I can offer a few words of
explanation.

Dave.

-- 
Web Site: www.david-keenan.com
2007 PAW: www.david-keenan.com/paw
2006 EuroBlog: www.david-keenan.com/euroblog


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Comparison of Ultrachrome K3 Advanced B&W and Cone Neutral K7 I

2007-01-14 by John Hollenberg

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "David Keenan"
<ausdlk@...> wrote:
>
> >then create a black and white profile using QTR
> >so you get WYSIWYG printing
> 
> In a previous thread there was a discussion about how ABW is a 
> profile-less workflow.  Perhaps someone who understands this better 
> than I can offer a few words of explanation.

It is all explained here:

http://www.outbackphoto.com/artof_b_w/bw_09/essay.html

You can profile QTR or ABW and save a lot of paper and time.

--John

Re: Comparison of Ultrachrome K3 Advanced B&W and Cone Neutral K7 I

2007-01-15 by David Keenan

>It is all explained here:
>
>http://www.outbackphoto.com/artof_b_w/bw_09/essay.html
>
>You can profile QTR or ABW and save a lot of paper and time.

Maybe I'm just lucky but I get great prints with no surprises on my 2400 in
ABW mode using color profiles that I made using PrintFix Pro 1.1. Works well
using various off-the-shelf profiles too.

Prints appear just as they do on the screen.

Dave.

-- 
Web Site: www.david-keenan.com
2007 PAW: www.david-keenan.com/paw
2006 EuroBlog: www.david-keenan.com/euroblog


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.