Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Soft proofing cold paper

Soft proofing cold paper

2008-11-17 by pr_roark

Is there a way to have Photoshop show the actual tones that are 
recorded in the ICC? In this case the ICC is one made with Create ICC 
RGB. 

That is, when I use "convert to profile" and that profile is of, for 
example, a cold paper the tones that seem to be previewed on the 
monitor always set the white point to R,G,B = 255, 255, 255 (Lab 100, 
0,0) even though the ICC clearly contains the paper cold paper tone.  
Likewise, where the range of, for example, Lab B is -2 to +2, it 
appears what shows up in the PS Information palette is a range from 0 
to 4.

It looks like the system always adjusts the white point to neutral and 
then shows the relative tones.  Is there a way to avoid this?

Thanks,

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Re: Soft proofing cold paper

2008-11-17 by Tyler Boley

Paul, not in the conversion preview or normal Photoshop viewing. But
in soft proof, yes. You'll see the paper white check box there...
Tyler
http://www.custom-digital.com/

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark"
<pr_roark@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Is there a way to have Photoshop show the actual tones that are 
> recorded in the ICC? In this case the ICC is one made with Create ICC 
> RGB. 
> 
> That is, when I use "convert to profile" and that profile is of, for 
> example, a cold paper the tones that seem to be previewed on the 
> monitor always set the white point to R,G,B = 255, 255, 255 (Lab 100, 
> 0,0) even though the ICC clearly contains the paper cold paper tone.  
> Likewise, where the range of, for example, Lab B is -2 to +2, it 
> appears what shows up in the PS Information palette is a range from 0 
> to 4.
> 
> It looks like the system always adjusts the white point to neutral and 
> then shows the relative tones.  Is there a way to avoid this?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>

Re: Soft proofing cold paper

2008-11-17 by pr_roark

Thanks Tyler.  What I'm trying to do is get people a visual example 
of print tones as well as the graphs I publish.  It appears many 
don't understand the graphs and are surprised by the print tones 
they're getting.  It may be that the soft proofing, then a screen 
grab, and finally fine-tuning to match the PS info palette readouts 
to the actual spectro values may be what I'll have to do.  (There's 
got to be a better way.)  Even when I do that, my calibrated monitor 
still doesn't really look like what is on my walls.  I think at the 
low Lab A & B values I'm dealing with the print lighting and display 
may have too much impact on the final display look to have any 
computer monitor be a very good predictor.  Oh well...

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" 
<tyler@...> wrote:
>
> Paul, not in the conversion preview or normal Photoshop viewing. But
> in soft proof, yes. You'll see the paper white check box there...
> Tyler
> http://www.custom-digital.com/
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark"
> <pr_roark@> wrote:
> >
> > Is there a way to have Photoshop show the actual tones that are 
> > recorded in the ICC? In this case the ICC is one made with Create 
ICC 
> > RGB. 
> > 
> > That is, when I use "convert to profile" and that profile is of, 
for 
> > example, a cold paper the tones that seem to be previewed on the 
> > monitor always set the white point to R,G,B = 255, 255, 255 (Lab 
100, 
> > 0,0) even though the ICC clearly contains the paper cold paper 
tone.  
> > Likewise, where the range of, for example, Lab B is -2 to +2, it 
> > appears what shows up in the PS Information palette is a range 
from 0 
> > to 4.
> > 
> > It looks like the system always adjusts the white point to 
neutral and 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > then shows the relative tones.  Is there a way to avoid this?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Paul
> > www.PaulRoark.com
> >
>

Re: Soft proofing cold paper

2008-11-17 by Tyler Boley

ah, got it. Try this, convert to your profile, then convert again to
sRGB, assuming they are for web display, or maybe dropped into a pdf,
but use Absolute Colormetric for the rendering intent. That will
accurately put the paper white point and ink black points into the
sRGB space without endpoint correction. Is that more useful?
Perhaps ARGB depending on where and how it will be used...
T

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark"
<pr_roark@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Thanks Tyler.  What I'm trying to do is get people a visual example 
> of print tones as well as the graphs I publish.  It appears many 
> don't understand the graphs and are surprised by the print tones 
> they're getting.  It may be that the soft proofing, then a screen 
> grab, and finally fine-tuning to match the PS info palette readouts 
> to the actual spectro values may be what I'll have to do.  (There's 
> got to be a better way.)  Even when I do that, my calibrated monitor 
> still doesn't really look like what is on my walls.  I think at the 
> low Lab A & B values I'm dealing with the print lighting and display 
> may have too much impact on the final display look to have any 
> computer monitor be a very good predictor.  Oh well...
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" 
> <tyler@> wrote:
> >
> > Paul, not in the conversion preview or normal Photoshop viewing. But
> > in soft proof, yes. You'll see the paper white check box there...
> > Tyler
> > http://www.custom-digital.com/
> > 
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark"
> > <pr_roark@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there a way to have Photoshop show the actual tones that are 
> > > recorded in the ICC? In this case the ICC is one made with Create 
> ICC 
> > > RGB. 
> > > 
> > > That is, when I use "convert to profile" and that profile is of, 
> for 
> > > example, a cold paper the tones that seem to be previewed on the 
> > > monitor always set the white point to R,G,B = 255, 255, 255 (Lab 
> 100, 
> > > 0,0) even though the ICC clearly contains the paper cold paper 
> tone.  
> > > Likewise, where the range of, for example, Lab B is -2 to +2, it 
> > > appears what shows up in the PS Information palette is a range 
> from 0 
> > > to 4.
> > > 
> > > It looks like the system always adjusts the white point to 
> neutral and 
> > > then shows the relative tones.  Is there a way to avoid this?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Paul
> > > www.PaulRoark.com
> > >
> >
>

Re: Soft proofing cold paper

2008-11-17 by pr_roark

Tyler,
>
>... Try this, convert to your profile, then convert again to
> sRGB, ... but use Absolute Colormetric for the rendering 
> intent. That will accurately put the paper white point 
> and ink black points into the sRGB space without endpoint
> correction. Is that more useful?

That almost works.  The 5% patch for some reason gets too light -- only 
one Lab L unit darker than the 0% patch.  

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Re: Soft proofing cold paper

2008-11-17 by Tyler Boley

the continuing and constantly changing but never diminishing mysteries
of color management, there may be no perfect solution.
By the way, I've had this wind up displaying very yellow in some
browsers or apps, for no apparent reason. The massive bulbous brains
on the colorsync list ignored my alerts and went back to who has the
biggest pocket protector, so I don't know what's up there.
The solution, if this happens to you, is first convert to a nice bigs
space (ARGB or whatever) with Absolute Colormetric, the once more to
sRGB with Relative. I know I know, but it worked. Coverting in PReview
worked to, but that's a Mac app.
T

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark"
<pr_roark@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Tyler,
> >
> >... Try this, convert to your profile, then convert again to
> > sRGB, ... but use Absolute Colormetric for the rendering 
> > intent. That will accurately put the paper white point 
> > and ink black points into the sRGB space without endpoint
> > correction. Is that more useful?
> 
> That almost works.  The 5% patch for some reason gets too light -- only 
> one Lab L unit darker than the 0% patch.  
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Soft proofing cold paper

2008-11-18 by Cdtobie

Can't speak for the bulbous brains on the ColorSync list: but an AbCol  
conversion, followed by a RelCol return is how you convert to show  
your paper white in the final image. So you've got the right process,  
Tyler.

C. D. Tobie
WW Product Technology Mngr.
Digital Imaging & Home Theater
DataColor.com
CDTobie@...
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Nov 17, 2008, at 6:38 PM, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> wrote:

> the continuing and constantly changing but never diminishing mysteries
> of color management, there may be no perfect solution.
> By the way, I've had this wind up displaying very yellow in some
> browsers or apps, for no apparent reason. The massive bulbous brains
> on the colorsync list ignored my alerts and went back to who has the
> biggest pocket protector, so I don't know what's up there.
> The solution, if this happens to you, is first convert to a nice bigs
> space (ARGB or whatever) with Absolute Colormetric, the once more to
> sRGB with Relative. I know I know, but it worked. Coverting in PReview
> worked to, but that's a Mac app.
> T
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark"
> <pr_roark@...> wrote:
>>
>> Tyler,
>>>
>>> ... Try this, convert to your profile, then convert again to
>>> sRGB, ... but use Absolute Colormetric for the rendering
>>> intent. That will accurately put the paper white point
>>> and ink black points into the sRGB space without endpoint
>>> correction. Is that more useful?
>>
>> That almost works.  The 5% patch for some reason gets too light --  
>> only
>> one Lab L unit darker than the 0% patch.
>>
>> Paul
>> www.PaulRoark.com
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other  
> resources as they are often being updated.
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish  
> to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting  
> this same page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages  
> to keep them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or  
> flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed  
> from the membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital  
> B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be  
> removed from the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and  
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group  
> Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in  
> the Files section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE  
> PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNE 
> R” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL  
> NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,  
> CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DA 
> MAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE L 
> OSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW,  
> THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH D 
> AMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIG 
> ITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTER 
> ATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF  
> ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) AN 
> Y OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

[Digital BW] Re: Soft proofing cold paper

2008-11-18 by Tyler Boley

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Cdtobie
<CDTobie@...> wrote:
>
> Can't speak for the bulbous brains on the ColorSync list...

I know, a noticeable absence of productive threads there for some
time, as well as productive threaders, including you... <G>
Tyler

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Soft proofing cold paper

2008-11-18 by cdtobie

On Nov 17, 2008, at 10:34:30 PM, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> 
wrote:

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Cdtobie
<CDTobie@...> wrote:
> 
> Can't speak for the bulbous brains on the ColorSync list...

I know, a noticeable absence of productive threads there for some
time, as well as productive threaders, including you... <G>
___
Well, there's not much for me to say to gratuitous posts stating how 
wonderful the ColorMunki is, by people who should know better, and 
probably do know better... those are advertisements, not color 
management posts, and I refuse to start a dog fight over them. So 
until the list actually starts discussing interesting topics in color 
management, I'll spend my time some place productive.
--
C. David Tobie
WW Product Technology Manager
Digital Imaging & Home Theater
Datacolor
CDTobie@...
www.datacolor.com/spyder3


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.