Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

RE: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow

RE: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow

2002-02-12 by Alessandro Pardi

After a while,
 
I can happily report that I get great prints with this workflow, using a PC,
an Epson 1160 with the Epson driver and EAM paper.
I had to tweak the curves a bit, making the red (darkest gray) curve a bit
steeper in the 80%-95% range, because the step-wedge print hadn't a very
good separation in that area, but this may well be due to different printers
samples. After that, my 1160 is able to brilliantly(1) print the Tyler's
zees image, completely dotless, and with no apparent banding.
I compared the step-wedge I printed with the Woolf's workflow, and there is
a clear advantage with Randall's curves: no dots in the highlights (vs.
visible, though absolutely acceptable, dots in the 5% with Woolf), no
banding (vs. banding from 60% upwards), and even a deeper 100% black.
 
Please note that this report refers to the old FS inks: not the new
reformulated inks, and not the FS neutral inks (so curves will probably need
further tweaking for these sets).
If anyone is interested, I can post the modified curves (or simply the
values I changed: e.g.,  move 80% from 65 to 69).
 
Alessandro Pardi
 
(1) This means that I am able to see a Z in every square, although in some
squares this is not so clear as in others.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: jrandall1149 [mailto:jrandall@...]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 02:53
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow


I have developed a MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow 
for Windows PCs,Epson 1160 Printer & Driver on EAM.  This might be 
very useful for 1160 owners who want to try an RGB partitioned 
workflow with the FS inks as an alternative to the Woolf lumped 
grayscale workflow. The partitioned workflow takes full advantage of 
the light, medium, and dark gray and black inks while the lumped 
grayscale workflow combines the light, medium, and dark gray into one 
mixed gray. 

The workflow and curves for PhotoShop (.acv) and Picture Windows 
(.cc) are in ** Files> Inksets, reviews and techniques> MIS FS> 1160 
Partitioned Workflow ** of this forum.  The curves are draft and I 
will update them soon.

Note:  You must be a member of this forum to download files.

Enjoy.

Jeff Randall




Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint> 

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage. 




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow

2002-02-12 by jrandall1149

Alessandro:

I am glad the workflow worked so well for you!

Did you change any other curve values (other than Red 80% from 65 to 
67)?  Please let me know so I can test your changes with my printer.  
I have noticed that my printer "drifts" slightly from day to day.  
Also as you pointed out, there appear to be slight variations among 
printers.

Thanks.

Jeff Randall

Group:

The workflow and curves for PhotoShop (.acv) and curves for Picture 
Windows (.cc) are posted in __Files> Inksets, reviews and techniques> 
MIS FS> 1160 Partitioned Workflow__  of this forum.  

The curves are still draft and I will update them after I get more 
feedback.


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Alessandro Pardi 
<alessandro.pardi@i...> wrote:
> After a while,
>  
> I can happily report that I get great prints with this workflow, 
using a PC,
> an Epson 1160 with the Epson driver and EAM paper.
> I had to tweak the curves a bit, making the red (darkest gray) 
curve a bit
> steeper in the 80%-95% range, because the step-wedge print hadn't a 
very
> good separation in that area, but this may well be due to different 
printers
> samples. After that, my 1160 is able to brilliantly(1) print the 
Tyler's
> zees image, completely dotless, and with no apparent banding.
> I compared the step-wedge I printed with the Woolf's workflow, and 
there is
> a clear advantage with Randall's curves: no dots in the highlights 
(vs.
> visible, though absolutely acceptable, dots in the 5% with Woolf), 
no
> banding (vs. banding from 60% upwards), and even a deeper 100% 
black.
>  
> Please note that this report refers to the old FS inks: not the new
> reformulated inks, and not the FS neutral inks (so curves will 
probably need
> further tweaking for these sets).
> If anyone is interested, I can post the modified curves (or simply 
the
> values I changed: e.g.,  move 80% from 65 to 69).
>  
> Alessandro Pardi
>  
> (1) This means that I am able to see a Z in every square, although 
in some
> squares this is not so clear as in others.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jrandall1149 [mailto:jrandall@c...]
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 02:53
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y...
> Subject: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad 
Workflow
> 
> 
> I have developed a MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow 
> for Windows PCs,Epson 1160 Printer & Driver on EAM.  This might be 
> very useful for 1160 owners who want to try an RGB partitioned 
> workflow with the FS inks as an alternative to the Woolf lumped 
> grayscale workflow. The partitioned workflow takes full advantage 
of 
> the light, medium, and dark gray and black inks while the lumped 
> grayscale workflow combines the light, medium, and dark gray into 
one 
> mixed gray. 
> 
> The workflow and curves for PhotoShop (.acv) and Picture Windows 
> (.cc) are in ** Files> Inksets, reviews and techniques> MIS FS> 
1160 
> Partitioned Workflow ** of this forum.  The curves are draft and I 
> will update them soon.
> 
> Note:  You must be a member of this forum to download files.
> 
> Enjoy.
> 
> Jeff Randall
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, 
Polls and
> other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint> 
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages 
to keep
> them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject 
header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks 
or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
various
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> resources on the homepage. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow

2002-02-13 by Alessandro Pardi

Jeff,
 
I changed a few values in that range, the 80% from 65 to 67 was just an
example. I won't be able to access my PC until this weekend (I'm at work
now), so I'll send you the modified curve probably next monday.
All I can say is that I first tried to modify the global RGB curve, but that
caused banding, whereas changing the Red curve gave no banding in the
various trials I ran.
 
Thanks again for your work,
Alessandro
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: jrandall1149 [mailto:jrandall@...]
Sent: martedì 12 febbraio 2002 23.24
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow


Alessandro:

I am glad the workflow worked so well for you!

Did you change any other curve values (other than Red 80% from 65 to 
67)?  Please let me know so I can test your changes with my printer.  
I have noticed that my printer "drifts" slightly from day to day.  
Also as you pointed out, there appear to be slight variations among 
printers.

Thanks.

Jeff Randall

Group:

The workflow and curves for PhotoShop (.acv) and curves for Picture 
Windows (.cc) are posted in __Files> Inksets, reviews and techniques> 
MIS FS> 1160 Partitioned Workflow__  of this forum.  

The curves are still draft and I will update them after I get more 
feedback.


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Alessandro Pardi 
<alessandro.pardi@i...> wrote:
> After a while,
>  
> I can happily report that I get great prints with this workflow, 
using a PC,
> an Epson 1160 with the Epson driver and EAM paper.
> I had to tweak the curves a bit, making the red (darkest gray) 
curve a bit
> steeper in the 80%-95% range, because the step-wedge print hadn't a 
very
> good separation in that area, but this may well be due to different 
printers
> samples. After that, my 1160 is able to brilliantly(1) print the 
Tyler's
> zees image, completely dotless, and with no apparent banding.
> I compared the step-wedge I printed with the Woolf's workflow, and 
there is
> a clear advantage with Randall's curves: no dots in the highlights 
(vs.
> visible, though absolutely acceptable, dots in the 5% with Woolf), 
no
> banding (vs. banding from 60% upwards), and even a deeper 100% 
black.
>  
> Please note that this report refers to the old FS inks: not the new
> reformulated inks, and not the FS neutral inks (so curves will 
probably need
> further tweaking for these sets).
> If anyone is interested, I can post the modified curves (or simply 
the
> values I changed: e.g.,  move 80% from 65 to 69).
>  
> Alessandro Pardi
>  
> (1) This means that I am able to see a Z in every square, although 
in some
> squares this is not so clear as in others.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jrandall1149 [mailto:jrandall@c...]
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 02:53
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y...
> Subject: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad 
Workflow
> 
> 
> I have developed a MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow 
> for Windows PCs,Epson 1160 Printer & Driver on EAM.  This might be 
> very useful for 1160 owners who want to try an RGB partitioned 
> workflow with the FS inks as an alternative to the Woolf lumped 
> grayscale workflow. The partitioned workflow takes full advantage 
of 
> the light, medium, and dark gray and black inks while the lumped 
> grayscale workflow combines the light, medium, and dark gray into 
one 
> mixed gray. 
> 
> The workflow and curves for PhotoShop (.acv) and Picture Windows 
> (.cc) are in ** Files> Inksets, reviews and techniques> MIS FS> 
1160 
> Partitioned Workflow ** of this forum.  The curves are draft and I 
> will update them soon.
> 
> Note:  You must be a member of this forum to download files.
> 
> Enjoy.
> 
> Jeff Randall
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, 
Polls and
> other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint> 
> < http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint> > 
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages 
to keep
> them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject 
header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks 
or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
various
> resources on the homepage. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> < http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> >
. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor	

ADVERTISEMENT
 
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=217097.1884387.3381019.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=17050191
82:HM/A=960173/R=0/*http://service.bfast.com/bfast/click?bfmid=29150849&site
id=39249818&bfpage=moneyyahoo4> 	
 
<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=217097.1884387.3381019.1261774/D=egroupmai
l/S=1705019182:HM/A=960173/rand=995205424> 	

Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint> 

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage. 




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow

2002-02-13 by jrandall1149

Alessandro Pardi <alessandro.pardi@i...> wrote:

> All I can say is that I first tried to modify the global RGB curve, 
but that
> caused banding, whereas changing the Red curve gave no banding in 
the
> various trials I ran.

Alessandro:

Yes, the Red curve controls the Cyan postion ink (which is the dark 
gray in the FS and Piezo systems) so adjusting it is the best way 
change the dark end.  You can't directly control the Black ink -- I 
think the driver automatically turns it on when each RGB values is 
below about 50%.  Paul Roark may want to step in to correct or add to 
this.

Using any combined RGB transfer function curve to adjust the output 
really defeats the purpose of a Partitioned workflow -- a meat axe vs 
scapel.  Note:  the Green curve controls the Magenta position ink 
(medium gray) and the Blue curve controls the Yellow position ink 
(light gray).  Adjusting each separete RGB curve is how I built the 
partition curve.

Thanks.

Jeff Randall

Re: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow

2002-02-13 by Paul Roark

Alessandro Pardi wrote:

> ...I first tried to modify the global RGB curve,
>but that caused banding, whereas changing the Red
>curve gave no banding

Jeff Randall wrote:

>Yes, the Red curve controls the Cyan position ink (which is the dark
>gray in the FS and Piezo systems) so adjusting it is the best way
>change the dark end.  You can't directly control the Black ink -- I
>think the driver automatically turns it on when each RGB values is
>below about 50%.  Paul Roark may want to step in to correct or add to
>this.

I haven't been following all this thread, so my comments may not be
responsive to the issues you were originally addressing.

>Using any combined RGB transfer function ... -- a meat axe ...

I agree with this.



A couple general thoughts I might add -- too radical slopes on curves
sometimes adds artifacts.  The magenta position ink is sufficiently light
that it might be run up into the highlights a little more, allowing the
slopes to be decreased a bit.

The black ink is turned on by the driver looking at the combined R, G, B
values.  The black ink is a potential source of dots as it starts to be
turned on.  And, when I measure the roughness of test strips, in general,
the worst areas are never the highlights, but the shadows.  The
concentration on highlight dots is a bit misplaced, in my view.

When the blue (yellow-position, lightest ink) and green (magenta-position,
next lightest ink) have both been run all the way down -- that is, turned on
to 100% flow -- the red curve (cyan-position, dark gray) ink becomes the
"switch" for the black.  If you look at the red curve of the PS_FS1160a
curve, you see a reduction of slope of the curve at about 55% (115 input on
the 256 scale).  That might be where the black ink starts to come on.

If there are any dots are roughness in the tests strips at that point (I
don't have one in front of me) it might be because the black ink was turned
on before the cyan ink was on full enough to hide the black dots.  What I
have done on some curves is pull the lightest ink back from being on 100%.
It is light enough that even a reverse slope can easily be overcome by the
cyan ink.  If the lightest ink curve is raised enough, then the cyan ink can
be more fully on and the lightest ink curve can be a "switch" for the black
ink.  It might be that this approach can reduce roughness in the shadows as
the black ink starts to be poured in.

Often in my VM curves all three curves are close to the bottom (full-on)
position, but not totally on.  Then all three can be used to control the
black.  The lightest gray will give the finer control than the cyan because
a one-unit increase in the light ink doesn't add as much density as a
one-unit increase in the cyan ink, the black ink, indirect increase being
equal for both.

Also, if curves have waviness down in the shadows (and my curves do
occasionally -- things I have to get back to as time permits), if you have 2
or 3 curves that are not totally on and able to  adjust the black, you can
stagger the control points and get finer control.  That is, we are limited
to 15 points per curve.  If there is a  bump between, for example, the "85%"
and "80%" points, keep the points of one curves on those points, but move
the points of another curve to midpoints, for example, the "82%" position.

Overall, I'm not sure that having the lighter ink curves full on early is an
advantage.  Their ability to add to the accuracy of control in the shadows
might be an advantage.

I run into this problem with the "warm" vm curves.  Because I'm holding back
the toner as much as possible, that curve becomes my sole control in the
shadows.  The result is sometimes persistent humps in the ramp that are
tough to control.  And, when I have them controlled on one printer, someone
else with the same printer type might report a problem there just due to the
normal production variations in these machines.  The more radical the curve
slope is, the more these production differences seem to surface.

And so it goes.  None of these things is perfect, and the ability of the
individual to adjust the curves to his/her own machine is a real advantage.

Paul
http://www.PaulRoark.com

Re: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow

2002-02-13 by Martin Wesley

Paul,

Very helpful information on RGB separation curve creation. I have posted the body of your message in the Files section under:

Files > Inksets, reviews and techniques > MIS Variable Mix 

Those interested will also find your earlier and longer discussion of this topic at the same location.

Thanks,
Martin Wesley
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...>
To: "DigitalB&WPrint" <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow


> Alessandro Pardi wrote:
> 
> > ...I first tried to modify the global RGB curve,
> >but that caused banding, whereas changing the Red
> >curve gave no banding
> 
> Jeff Randall wrote:
> 
> >Yes, the Red curve controls the Cyan position ink (which is the dark
> >gray in the FS and Piezo systems) so adjusting it is the best way
> >change the dark end.  You can't directly control the Black ink -- I
> >think the driver automatically turns it on when each RGB values is
> >below about 50%.  Paul Roark may want to step in to correct or add to
> >this.
> 
> I haven't been following all this thread, so my comments may not be
> responsive to the issues you were originally addressing.
> 
> >Using any combined RGB transfer function ... -- a meat axe ...
> 
> I agree with this.
> 
> 
> 
> A couple general thoughts I might add -- too radical slopes on curves
> sometimes adds artifacts.  The magenta position ink is sufficiently light
> that it might be run up into the highlights a little more, allowing the
> slopes to be decreased a bit.
> 
> The black ink is turned on by the driver looking at the combined R, G, B
> values.  The black ink is a potential source of dots as it starts to be
> turned on.  And, when I measure the roughness of test strips, in general,
> the worst areas are never the highlights, but the shadows.  The
> concentration on highlight dots is a bit misplaced, in my view.
> 
> When the blue (yellow-position, lightest ink) and green (magenta-position,
> next lightest ink) have both been run all the way down -- that is, turned on
> to 100% flow -- the red curve (cyan-position, dark gray) ink becomes the
> "switch" for the black.  If you look at the red curve of the PS_FS1160a
> curve, you see a reduction of slope of the curve at about 55% (115 input on
> the 256 scale).  That might be where the black ink starts to come on.
> 
> If there are any dots are roughness in the tests strips at that point (I
> don't have one in front of me) it might be because the black ink was turned
> on before the cyan ink was on full enough to hide the black dots.  What I
> have done on some curves is pull the lightest ink back from being on 100%.
> It is light enough that even a reverse slope can easily be overcome by the
> cyan ink.  If the lightest ink curve is raised enough, then the cyan ink can
> be more fully on and the lightest ink curve can be a "switch" for the black
> ink.  It might be that this approach can reduce roughness in the shadows as
> the black ink starts to be poured in.
> 
> Often in my VM curves all three curves are close to the bottom (full-on)
> position, but not totally on.  Then all three can be used to control the
> black.  The lightest gray will give the finer control than the cyan because
> a one-unit increase in the light ink doesn't add as much density as a
> one-unit increase in the cyan ink, the black ink, indirect increase being
> equal for both.
> 
> Also, if curves have waviness down in the shadows (and my curves do
> occasionally -- things I have to get back to as time permits), if you have 2
> or 3 curves that are not totally on and able to  adjust the black, you can
> stagger the control points and get finer control.  That is, we are limited
> to 15 points per curve.  If there is a  bump between, for example, the "85%"
> and "80%" points, keep the points of one curves on those points, but move
> the points of another curve to midpoints, for example, the "82%" position.
> 
> Overall, I'm not sure that having the lighter ink curves full on early is an
> advantage.  Their ability to add to the accuracy of control in the shadows
> might be an advantage.
> 
> I run into this problem with the "warm" vm curves.  Because I'm holding back
> the toner as much as possible, that curve becomes my sole control in the
> shadows.  The result is sometimes persistent humps in the ramp that are
> tough to control.  And, when I have them controlled on one printer, someone
> else with the same printer type might report a problem there just due to the
> normal production variations in these machines.  The more radical the curve
> slope is, the more these production differences seem to surface.
> 
> And so it goes.  None of these things is perfect, and the ability of the
> individual to adjust the curves to his/her own machine is a real advantage.
> 
> Paul
> http://www.PaulRoark.com



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow

2002-02-13 by jrandall1149

"Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote:

>If you look at the red curve of the PS_FS1160a
> curve, you see a reduction of slope of the curve at about 55% (115 
input on the 256 scale).  

That where I think the black kicks in and was the basis (although 
weak) of my statement that all three inks should be greater than 50% 
(black = 100%).  The problem Alessandro was having was in the 80%+ 
area and thus probably not affected by the black kicking in, but 
curve generation is of course a lot of art with some science...

>What I
> have done on some curves is pull the lightest ink back from being 
on 100%.
> It is light enough that even a reverse slope can easily be overcome 
by the
> cyan ink.  If the lightest ink curve is raised enough, then the 
cyan ink can
> be more fully on and the lightest ink curve can be a "switch" for 
the black
> ink.  

Your pzoRGB4 curve that you shared with me did this.  I played with 
it for many milliliters of ink, but could not get it to smoothly 
transition or to to give me deep dark shadows so I went to the full 
on for the yellow and magenta position inks and let the cyan position 
ink curve control the dark gray and indirectly the black.


>That is, we are limited
> to 15 points per curve.  If there is a  bump between, for example, 
the "85%"
> and "80%" points, keep the points of one curves on those points, 
but move
> the points of another curve to midpoints, for example, the "82%" 
position.

Picture Windows users are not limited to 15 control points.  Also 
versions of PhotoShop that can generate AMP curves (as opposed to ARC 
curves in PS6.0) are not limited to 15 points (see Chris Brandin's 
curves).


> The more radical the curve
> slope is, the more these production differences seem to surface.

Agree 100%.  

Thanks.

Jeff Randall

RE: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow -- 3000 workflow?

2002-02-13 by Paul Roark

Jeff,

Do you -- or does anyone -- have an RGB workflow for the 3000 & PC for
Piezo/FS inks?  If not, I may make one.  I think the Piezo driver makes a
great image, but the inability to use my computer while it's printing is a
killer for me.  (With the large files, I've never been able to cure what
some say are spooling problems.)

Paul


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow -- 3000 workflow?

2002-02-13 by jrandall1149

"Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote:

> Do you -- or does anyone -- have an RGB workflow for the 3000 & PC 
for Piezo/FS inks?  If not, I may make one.  


I'd be happy to develop a PC flavored MIS-FS partitioned RGB workflow 
for the 3000 if someone in the Seattle area would loan me one for a 
couple of weeks.

Anybody??

Thanks.

Jeff Randall

Re: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow -- 3000 workflow?

2002-02-13 by Carolyn Frayn

Paul, 

this might be interesting:

<<<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/Inksets%
2C%20reviews%20and%20techniques/Piezo/>>>



the link on that message doesn't work... it's:

<<<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/Inksets%
2C%20reviews%20and%20techniques/Piezo/>>>

Tyler doesn't use that paper but it still may be of interest to you.

Carolyn
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Jeff,
> 
> Do you -- or does anyone -- have an RGB workflow for the 3000 & PC for
> Piezo/FS inks?  If not, I may make one.  I think the Piezo driver makes a
> great image, but the inability to use my computer while it's printing is a
> killer for me.  (With the large files, I've never been able to cure what
> some say are spooling problems.)
> 
> Paul

Re: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow -- 3000 workflow?

2002-02-13 by Carolyn Frayn

well that was brilliant...

here is the right first link:

<<<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/message/4555>>
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> the link on that message doesn't work... it's:
> 
> <<<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/Inksets%
> 2C%20reviews%20and%20techniques/Piezo/>>>
> 
> Tyler doesn't use that paper but it still may be of interest to you.
> 
> Carolyn

RE: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow

2002-02-18 by Alessandro Pardi

Jeff, 
here are the values I modifed in the red curve. Other values (and other
curves) are unchanged:
 
%      orig. modified
-----------------------------
95%    95    92
90%    91    85
80%    76    73
75%    68    65
70%    60    59
 
I printed on Epson Archival Matte, following the instructions you provided.
If anyone else wants to try this, remember to let the print sit for at least
12 hours before judging.
 
Alessandro Pardi
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: jrandall1149 [mailto:jrandall@...]
Sent: martedì 12 febbraio 2002 23.24
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow


Alessandro:

I am glad the workflow worked so well for you!

Did you change any other curve values (other than Red 80% from 65 to 
67)?  Please let me know so I can test your changes with my printer.  
I have noticed that my printer "drifts" slightly from day to day.  
Also as you pointed out, there appear to be slight variations among 
printers.

Thanks.

Jeff Randall

Group:

The workflow and curves for PhotoShop (.acv) and curves for Picture 
Windows (.cc) are posted in __Files> Inksets, reviews and techniques> 
MIS FS> 1160 Partitioned Workflow__  of this forum.  

The curves are still draft and I will update them after I get more 
feedback.


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Alessandro Pardi 
<alessandro.pardi@i...> wrote:
> After a while,
>  
> I can happily report that I get great prints with this workflow, 
using a PC,
> an Epson 1160 with the Epson driver and EAM paper.
> I had to tweak the curves a bit, making the red (darkest gray) 
curve a bit
> steeper in the 80%-95% range, because the step-wedge print hadn't a 
very
> good separation in that area, but this may well be due to different 
printers
> samples. After that, my 1160 is able to brilliantly(1) print the 
Tyler's
> zees image, completely dotless, and with no apparent banding.
> I compared the step-wedge I printed with the Woolf's workflow, and 
there is
> a clear advantage with Randall's curves: no dots in the highlights 
(vs.
> visible, though absolutely acceptable, dots in the 5% with Woolf), 
no
> banding (vs. banding from 60% upwards), and even a deeper 100% 
black.
>  
> Please note that this report refers to the old FS inks: not the new
> reformulated inks, and not the FS neutral inks (so curves will 
probably need
> further tweaking for these sets).
> If anyone is interested, I can post the modified curves (or simply 
the
> values I changed: e.g.,  move 80% from 65 to 69).
>  
> Alessandro Pardi
>  
> (1) This means that I am able to see a Z in every square, although 
in some
> squares this is not so clear as in others.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jrandall1149 [mailto:jrandall@c...]
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 02:53
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y...
> Subject: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad 
Workflow
> 
> 
> I have developed a MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow 
> for Windows PCs,Epson 1160 Printer & Driver on EAM.  This might be 
> very useful for 1160 owners who want to try an RGB partitioned 
> workflow with the FS inks as an alternative to the Woolf lumped 
> grayscale workflow. The partitioned workflow takes full advantage 
of 
> the light, medium, and dark gray and black inks while the lumped 
> grayscale workflow combines the light, medium, and dark gray into 
one 
> mixed gray. 
> 
> The workflow and curves for PhotoShop (.acv) and Picture Windows 
> (.cc) are in ** Files> Inksets, reviews and techniques> MIS FS> 
1160 
> Partitioned Workflow ** of this forum.  The curves are draft and I 
> will update them soon.
> 
> Note:  You must be a member of this forum to download files.
> 
> Enjoy.
> 
> Jeff Randall
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, 
Polls and
> other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint> 
> < http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint> > 
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages 
to keep
> them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject 
header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks 
or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
various
> resources on the homepage. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> < http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> >
. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor	

ADVERTISEMENT
 
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=217097.1884387.3381019.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=17050191
82:HM/A=960173/R=0/*http://service.bfast.com/bfast/click?bfmid=29150849&site
id=39249818&bfpage=moneyyahoo4> 	
 
<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=217097.1884387.3381019.1261774/D=egroupmai
l/S=1705019182:HM/A=960173/rand=995205424> 	

Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint> 

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage. 




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow

2002-02-18 by jrandall1149

Alessandro Pardi <alessandro.pardi@i...> wrote:
> here are the values I modifed in the red curve. Other values (and 
other
> curves) are unchanged:
>  
> %      orig. modified
> -----------------------------
> 95%    95    92
> 90%    91    85
> 80%    76    73
> 75%    68    65
> 70%    60    59
>  
> I printed on Epson Archival Matte, following the instructions you 
provided.
> If anyone else wants to try this, remember to let the print sit for 
at least
> 12 hours before judging.

Alessandro:

Thanks.  I'll check your tweaks on my printer in the next couple of 
days and report back.  As Paul Roark said, it might just be printer 
variations.

Do you use a spectrophotometer to evaluate the printed GS-Stepwedge 
or do you use a flat bed scanner and PhotoShop or other image editor 
to check the percent value 0-100, (or pixel value 0-255, or density, 
or ??) of the patches?  

Jeff Randall

RE: [Digital BW] MIS Full Spectrum Partitioned RGB Quad Workflow

2002-02-19 by Alessandro Pardi

Jeff,
 
unfortunately I haven't a spectrophotometer, and I can only access a flatbed
scanner at work: I tried a couple scans of the test strips but could find no
way to get reasonable values, so I gave up (I'm planning to buy an Epson
2450 shortly, I'll wait until that day). 
My tests are therefore far from scientific, since I simply evaluate test
strips by comparing them with the strips I printed with OEM inks on an Epson
870 and on the same 1160 I now use with quads. And, of course, I printed a
few images, and all is fine...
 
Alessandro
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: jrandall1149 [mailto:jrandall@...]


Do you use a spectrophotometer to evaluate the printed GS-Stepwedge 
or do you use a flat bed scanner and PhotoShop or other image editor 
to check the percent value 0-100, (or pixel value 0-255, or density, 
or ??) of the patches?  

Jeff Randall



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor	

ADVERTISEMENT
 
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=217097.1884387.3381019.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=17050191
82:HM/A=960173/R=0/*http://service.bfast.com/bfast/click?bfmid=29150849&site
id=39249818&bfpage=moneyyahoo4> 	
 
<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=217097.1884387.3381019.1261774/D=egroupmai
l/S=1705019182:HM/A=960173/rand=312131803> 	

Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint> 

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage. 




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.