Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Screen Printing or Digital Negatives ?

Screen Printing or Digital Negatives ?

2009-02-10 by jag24x

Hi,

I plan on using the MIS pigment based Eboni inks in a cheap 6 cartridge 
epson printer. Though I'm printing on a transparency OHP material to 
make digital negatives. Does anyone know if the Eboni inks will adhere 
well to transparency material? I just want to know if its worth going 
down this road and later I find out if was all worth my time and cost...
Thanks
Jag24x

RE: [Digital BW] Screen Printing or Digital Negatives ?

2009-02-10 by Eric Neilsen

You need to be more specific; What Brand? Pictorico? 

 

Eric Neilsen Photography

4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9

Dallas, TX 75226

214-827-8301

www.ericneilsenphotography.com

 

SKYPE   ejprinter

  _____  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of jag24x
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 1:51 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Screen Printing or Digital Negatives ?

 

Hi,

I plan on using the MIS pigment based Eboni inks in a cheap 6 cartridge 
epson printer. Though I'm printing on a transparency OHP 

.

 
<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=3702311/grpspId=1705019182/msgId
=95186/stime=1234252238/nc1=3848614/nc2=4025321/nc3=5191952> 





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Screen Printing or Digital Negatives ?

2009-02-11 by jag24x

Hi Eric,

Yes am looking at printing Pictorico OHP brand. I think the OHP 
material has a glossy surface, and i've read that the Eboni inks only 
like matte surfaces? Though I was wondering if anyone has had any 
success in printing B&W transparencies with the Eboni Ink? 
Perhaps there is another ink I should be looking at?
jag24x

RE: [Digital BW] Screen Printing or Digital Negatives ?

2009-02-11 by Eric Neilsen

I have made negs with Cone's Peizotones on Photo Warehouse Ultra Clear Film
UCF, that is a glossy material. I also have used the OHP with K3 inks as
well as K2. I am currently using K3 and Inkpress material.  I have not
unfortunately for you made any with Eboni so I can't say. The printers that
I use are a 7000 and a 4800; the 4800 without a RIP and the 7000 uses IP.

 

Eric

 

Eric Neilsen Photography

4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9

Dallas, TX 75226

214-827-8301

www.ericneilsenphotography.com

 

SKYPE   ejprinter

  _____  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of jag24x
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 6:21 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Screen Printing or Digital Negatives ?

 

Hi Eric,

Yes am looking at printing Pictorico OHP brand. I think the OHP 
material has a glossy surface, and i've read that the Eboni inks only 
like matte surfaces? Though I was wondering if anyone has had any 
success in printing B&W transparencies with the Eboni Ink? 
Perhaps there is another ink I should be looking at?
jag24x





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Screen Printing or Digital Negatives ?

2009-02-11 by ebenostby

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Eric Neilsen"
<e.neilsen2@...> wrote:
> I have not
> unfortunately for you made any with Eboni so I can't say. The
printers that
> I use are a 7000 and a 4800; the 4800 without a RIP and the 7000
uses IP.
> 
>  
> 

I use Eboni on OHP (as well as Arista OH film) and find it works well.
The surface of the negative is, however, slightly fragile - if you
touch it with fingers you can smudge it, especially shortly after you
print it. I put a thin sheet of transparent material between the
negative and the coated paper when exposing and this prevents any
transfer, especially where the paper is still slightly damp. 

I don't know if other inks have the same fragility, but I'd expect so.
Some of that also depends on the ink load, which of course  you can
adjust in QTR.

Re: Screen Printing or Digital Negatives ?

2009-02-12 by Robin Hodges

Pictorico OHP is by far the best medium that I have come across as the
surface is so absorbent and it is possible to print at 2880 dpi without
causing any flooding.  The digital negative needs an adjustment curve to
accommodate the analogue image you wish to achieve.  This is easily acquired
by trial an error as it is dependent upon your printer/inks and the medium
for the analogue positive.

 

Robin Hodges 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Screen Printing or Digital Negatives ?

2009-02-13 by Eric Neilsen

So you tried the Inkpress Robin? And you have experience with both the old
OHP and the new? Or just the new? I don't see any puddlling with Inkpress or
Pictorico OHP @ 2880. Then again I didn't see any with Ultra Clear at 2880
either, but that was with IP running the show. 

 

 

 

Eric Neilsen Photography

4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9

Dallas, TX 75226

214-827-8301

www.ericneilsenphotography.com

 

SKYPE   ejprinter

  _____  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Robin
Hodges
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 8:50 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Screen Printing or Digital Negatives ?

 

Pictorico OHP is by far the best medium that I have come across as the
surface is so absorbent and it is possible to print at 2880 dpi without
causing any flooding. The digital negative needs an adjustment curve to
accommodate the analogue image you wish to achieve. This is easily acquired
by trial an error as it is dependent upon your printer/inks and the medium
for the analogue positive.

Robin Hodges 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.