Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

2400 vs 1400 with piezography

2400 vs 1400 with piezography

2009-05-26 by edrudolpho

I'd like recommendations.  I'm debating whether to convert my 2400 to piezography or whether to get a 1400 with piezography package.  The cost difference doesn't seem like that much.  I'm interested in the print qualities people are observing.

A little background:  I was quite happy using a 2200 with the UT-7 inkset but that printer died and I was then seduced by the glamour of the new fibre-type papers in the K3 2400 printer.  Now I find myself missing the beauties of carbon on matte.

Ed

Re: 2400 vs 1400 with piezography

2009-05-26 by steve_wadlington

>
> I'd like recommendations.  I'm debating whether to convert my 2400 to piezography or whether to get a 1400 with piezography package.  The cost difference doesn't seem like that much.  I'm interested in the print qualities people are observing.
> Ed
>

I guess it depends if you still want color also. I found it impractical to do both on one printer. I converted my 2400 to the Roark C6 inkset with CFS, cartridges are too expensive, and bought a 1800 to do color. There are better printers now for color than the 1800, depends how much you want to spend.

Steve

Re: 2400 vs 1400 with piezography

2009-05-27 by Jon Cone

If you like the Piezography Special Edition inks, then go with the 1400. Those inks and the curves architecture for them were matched to each other while being designed on the 1400. It is the purest implementation of Piezography Special Edition which is a very subtle yet complex split tone - from neutral highlights through selenium into warm shadows.

Jon Cone 


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho" <erudolph@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> I'd like recommendations.  I'm debating whether to convert my 2400 to piezography or whether to get a 1400 with piezography package.  The cost difference doesn't seem like that much.  I'm interested in the print qualities people are observing.
> 
> A little background:  I was quite happy using a 2200 with the UT-7 inkset but that printer died and I was then seduced by the glamour of the new fibre-type papers in the K3 2400 printer.  Now I find myself missing the beauties of carbon on matte.
> 
> Ed
>

Re: 2400 vs 1400 with piezography

2009-05-27 by edrudolpho

I haven't seen any prints made with the Special Edition inks.  Is there a sample image or images on the web?

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> If you like the Piezography Special Edition inks, then go with the 1400. Those inks and the curves architecture for them were matched to each other while being designed on the 1400. It is the purest implementation of Piezography Special Edition which is a very subtle yet complex split tone - from neutral highlights through selenium into warm shadows.
> 
> Jon Cone 
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho" <erudolph@> wrote:
> >
> > I'd like recommendations.  I'm debating whether to convert my 2400 to piezography or whether to get a 1400 with piezography package.  The cost difference doesn't seem like that much.  I'm interested in the print qualities people are observing.
> > 
> > A little background:  I was quite happy using a 2200 with the UT-7 inkset but that printer died and I was then seduced by the glamour of the new fibre-type papers in the K3 2400 printer.  Now I find myself missing the beauties of carbon on matte.
> > 
> > Ed
> >
>

Re: 2400 vs 1400 with piezography

2009-05-27 by Jon Cone

please email dana (at) inkjetmall (dot) com 
she can send you a small sample print

Jon


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho" <erudolph@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> I haven't seen any prints made with the Special Edition inks.  Is there a sample image or images on the web?
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@> wrote:
> >
> > If you like the Piezography Special Edition inks, then go with the 1400. Those inks and the curves architecture for them were matched to each other while being designed on the 1400. It is the purest implementation of Piezography Special Edition which is a very subtle yet complex split tone - from neutral highlights through selenium into warm shadows.
> > 
> > Jon Cone 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho" <erudolph@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd like recommendations.  I'm debating whether to convert my 2400 to piezography or whether to get a 1400 with piezography package.  The cost difference doesn't seem like that much.  I'm interested in the print qualities people are observing.
> > > 
> > > A little background:  I was quite happy using a 2200 with the UT-7 inkset but that printer died and I was then seduced by the glamour of the new fibre-type papers in the K3 2400 printer.  Now I find myself missing the beauties of carbon on matte.
> > > 
> > > Ed
> > >
> >
>

Re: 2400 vs 1400 with piezography

2009-05-28 by edrudolpho

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@...> wrote:
>
> please email dana (at) inkjetmall (dot) com 
> she can send you a small sample print
> 
Jon, a question:  you provide QTR profiles for this inkset.  Does the individual user then linearize them for their particular printer?  If not, do you find the tolerances of the 1400 printer to be good enough that you can use a canned profile with consistently good results?
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Jon
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho" <erudolph@> wrote:
> >
> > I haven't seen any prints made with the Special Edition inks.  Is there a sample image or images on the web?
> > 
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@> wrote:
> > >
> > > If you like the Piezography Special Edition inks, then go with the 1400. Those inks and the curves architecture for them were matched to each other while being designed on the 1400. It is the purest implementation of Piezography Special Edition which is a very subtle yet complex split tone - from neutral highlights through selenium into warm shadows.
> > > 
> > > Jon Cone 
> > >

Re: 2400 vs 1400 with piezography

2009-05-28 by Jon Cone

The user does not have to linearize a Piezography curve to produce very high standard results. It is the complexity (multiple inks in each gradation sep) of Piezography K6 and K7 curves that make any of the supported printers' tolerances more than adequate.

Jon


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho" <erudolph@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@> wrote:
> >
> > please email dana (at) inkjetmall (dot) com 
> > she can send you a small sample print
> > 
> Jon, a question:  you provide QTR profiles for this inkset.  Does the individual user then linearize them for their particular printer?  If not, do you find the tolerances of the 1400 printer to be good enough that you can use a canned profile with consistently good results?
> 
> > Jon
> > 
> > 
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho" <erudolph@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I haven't seen any prints made with the Special Edition inks.  Is there a sample image or images on the web?
> > > 
> > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > If you like the Piezography Special Edition inks, then go with the 1400. Those inks and the curves architecture for them were matched to each other while being designed on the 1400. It is the purest implementation of Piezography Special Edition which is a very subtle yet complex split tone - from neutral highlights through selenium into warm shadows.
> > > > 
> > > > Jon Cone 
> > > >
>

Re: 2400 vs 1400 with piezography

2009-05-28 by edrudolpho

So, you could say it's plug and play?

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> The user does not have to linearize a Piezography curve to produce very high standard results. It is the complexity (multiple inks in each gradation sep) of Piezography K6 and K7 curves that make any of the supported printers' tolerances more than adequate.
> 
> Jon
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho" <erudolph@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@> wrote:
> > >
> > > please email dana (at) inkjetmall (dot) com 
> > > she can send you a small sample print
> > > 
> > Jon, a question:  you provide QTR profiles for this inkset.  Does the individual user then linearize them for their particular printer?  If not, do you find the tolerances of the 1400 printer to be good enough that you can use a canned profile with consistently good results?
> > 
> > > Jon
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho" <erudolph@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I haven't seen any prints made with the Special Edition inks.  Is there a sample image or images on the web?
> > > > 
> > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > If you like the Piezography Special Edition inks, then go with the 1400. Those inks and the curves architecture for them were matched to each other while being designed on the 1400. It is the purest implementation of Piezography Special Edition which is a very subtle yet complex split tone - from neutral highlights through selenium into warm shadows.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Jon Cone 
> > > > >
> >
>

Re: 2400 vs 1400 with piezography

2009-05-28 by Jon Cone

Yes. That's the big feature behind Piezography. It just works realy well, and does so at a very high standard.

Jon



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho" <erudolph@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> So, you could say it's plug and play?
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@> wrote:
> >
> > The user does not have to linearize a Piezography curve to produce very high standard results. It is the complexity (multiple inks in each gradation sep) of Piezography K6 and K7 curves that make any of the supported printers' tolerances more than adequate.
> > 
> > Jon
> > 
> > 
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@...m, "edrudolpho" <erudolph@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > please email dana (at) inkjetmall (dot) com 
> > > > she can send you a small sample print
> > > > 
> > > Jon, a question:  you provide QTR profiles for this inkset.  Does the individual user then linearize them for their particular printer?  If not, do you find the tolerances of the 1400 printer to be good enough that you can use a canned profile with consistently good results?
> > > 
> > > > Jon
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho" <erudolph@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I haven't seen any prints made with the Special Edition inks.  Is there a sample image or images on the web?
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you like the Piezography Special Edition inks, then go with the 1400. Those inks and the curves architecture for them were matched to each other while being designed on the 1400. It is the purest implementation of Piezography Special Edition which is a very subtle yet complex split tone - from neutral highlights through selenium into warm shadows.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Jon Cone 
> > > > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: 2400 vs 1400 with piezography

2009-05-29 by Berel Lutsky

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@...> wrote:
>I can attest  to the ease of use  and quality of the K6SE inkset and the 1400 - without linearizing anything - What is necessary for the user to fully realize the potential of this combination is a very careful and informed practice of image capture and non-destructive editing in Photoshop

Berel Lutsky
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Yes. That's the big feature behind Piezography. It just works realy well, and does so at a very high standard.
> 
> Jon
> 
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho" <erudolph@> wrote:
> >
> > So, you could say it's plug and play?
> > 
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@> wrote:
> > >
> > > The user does not have to linearize a Piezography curve to produce very high standard results. It is the complexity (multiple inks in each gradation sep) of Piezography K6 and K7 curves that make any of the supported printers' tolerances more than adequate.
> > > 
> > > Jon
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho" <erudolph@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > please email dana (at) inkjetmall (dot) com 
> > > > > she can send you a small sample print
> > > > > 
> > > > Jon, a question:  you provide QTR profiles for this inkset.  Does the individual user then linearize them for their particular printer?  If not, do you find the tolerances of the 1400 printer to be good enough that you can use a canned profile with consistently good results?
> > > > 
> > > > > Jon
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho" <erudolph@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I haven't seen any prints made with the Special Edition inks.  Is there a sample image or images on the web?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you like the Piezography Special Edition inks, then go with the 1400. Those inks and the curves architecture for them were matched to each other while being designed on the 1400. It is the purest implementation of Piezography Special Edition which is a very subtle yet complex split tone - from neutral highlights through selenium into warm shadows.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Jon Cone 
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: 2400 vs 1400 with piezography

2009-05-29 by edrudolpho

Berel, can you tell me what paper(s) you have been printing on?

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Berel Lutsky" <berel.lutsky@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@> wrote:
> >I can attest  to the ease of use  and quality of the K6SE inkset and the 1400 - without linearizing anything - What is necessary for the user to fully realize the potential of this combination is a very careful and informed practice of image capture and non-destructive editing in Photoshop
> 
> Berel Lutsky

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.