Hi Dieter & Dirk, I don't own an A-113, so I cannot see the exact problem first-hand, but I did observe the nasty 'mush' on the falling edge of the A-111 square wave output (when it is below about 300Hz). I notice that the CEM3340 datasheet says that the falling edge is more rounded than the rising one, and that this can be improved by placing a 1meg resistor between pins 4 and 5 (pulse out and PWM input). This adds some hysteresis to the internal comparator, and should 'square up' the output. So I tried it and indeed it _did_ square up the signal, and also removed all the nasty 'noise' that Dieter reported. Thus this _may_ offer another possible solution, but the datasheet warns that adding the resistor might cause the internal comparator to oscillate, depending on the board layout etc. It certainly seemed well-behaved for the very simply check I made - perhaps Dieter can offer a more informed view on how good this might be as a solution (e.g. if the VCO is being rapidly switched between different frequencies, could this cause any problems?). Tim [*Fourth* attempt at posting this, so I really hope multiple copies don't suddenly arrive...] --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Dieter Doepfer" <hardware@...> wrote: > > Dirk, > > it took a while but now we found the reason and a solution ... > > We had problems to understand why the combination of A-110 (rectangle)/A-113 > is working perfect but not A-111(rectangle)/A-113 at low frequencies. > Strangely enough the combination A-111(sawtooth)/A-113 causes no problems. > > The reason is the negative slope of the A-111 rectangle ! Our oscilloscope > showed in high res mode (1us/div) that the negative slope is not a single > slope but has some ups and downs (a bit like a down-going triangle). > Obviously the waveform converter inside the CEM3340 has this behaviour as > the rectangle output of the A-111 is nothing but the rectangle output of the > CEM3340 (only via 1k protection resistor and AC coupling capacitor). In > normal applications this causes no problems and cannot be heard (each VCA or > VCF or mixer behind the A-111 smoothes this multiple slopes which are in the > microsecond range). But the A-113 is very fast and detects these multiple > slopes at low frequencies. This causes the problems of the A-111/A- 113 > combination you described. > > There are several solutions for this problem: > > 1. Do not use the rectangle but e.g. the sawtooth output of the A- 111 to > trigger the A-113 (the sawtooth has no multiple slopes) > 2. Process the rectangle output by any other module (VCA, VCF, mixer) before > it is used to trigger the A-113. > 3. Add a capacitor to the A-113 (in parallel to diode D3). We tried 2n2 and > then the A-113 tracks perfect from about 10Hz. If you contact me directly > (hardware@...) I can send you a picture that shows the position of D3 > on the A-113 board. In this case even the rectangle output of the A- 111 can > be used to trigger the A-113. > > Best wishes > Dieter Doepfer > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > > [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von vliesgaard > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. April 2006 12:35 > > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > > Betreff: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A-113 input sencetivity/tracking problems > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Dieter Doepfer" <hardware@> > > wrote: > > > > > > OK, I'll check this with an A-111 and A-113. But it may take a few days > as > > > we are very busy with testing and modifying the BBD modules as the > customers > > > are waiting anxiously for their modules. > > > > > > Best wishes > > > Dieter Doepfer > > > > > > > Don't worry, you get the full 100 points for customer service. If only > > other company's were that good. > > > > > > One use the A-113 is creating interesting rhythms. > > E.g. if you divide the 16th notes of the sequenser, with the A- 113, by > > 2 3 5 and 7 you get a very complex rhythm patern. > > Thats why it should track low frequenty's. > > > > Greetings Dirk >
Message
Re: A-113 input sencetivity/tracking problems
2006-05-07 by Tim Stinchcombe
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.