Tim, thank you for this information. I will try if the additional 1M resistor will work for the A-111. If this is true we will the resistor for new A-111 and prepare a document how to add this resistor for existing A-111. Best wishes Dieter Doepfer > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von Tim Stinchcombe > Gesendet: Sonntag, 7. Mai 2006 10:32 > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > Betreff: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A-113 input sencetivity/tracking problems > > > Hi Dieter & Dirk, > > I don't own an A-113, so I cannot see the exact problem first-hand, > but I did observe the nasty 'mush' on the falling edge of the A-111 > square wave output (when it is below about 300Hz). > > I notice that the CEM3340 datasheet says that the falling edge is > more rounded than the rising one, and that this can be improved by > placing a 1meg resistor between pins 4 and 5 (pulse out and PWM > input). This adds some hysteresis to the internal comparator, and > should 'square up' the output. So I tried it and indeed it _did_ > square up the signal, and also removed all the nasty 'noise' that > Dieter reported. > > Thus this _may_ offer another possible solution, but the datasheet > warns that adding the resistor might cause the internal comparator to > oscillate, depending on the board layout etc. It certainly seemed > well-behaved for the very simply check I made - perhaps Dieter can > offer a more informed view on how good this might be as a solution > (e.g. if the VCO is being rapidly switched between different > frequencies, could this cause any problems?). > > Tim > > [*Fourth* attempt at posting this, so I really hope multiple copies > don't suddenly arrive...] > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Dieter Doepfer" <hardware@...> > wrote: > > > > Dirk, > > > > it took a while but now we found the reason and a solution ... > > > > We had problems to understand why the combination of A-110 > (rectangle)/A-113 > > is working perfect but not A-111(rectangle)/A-113 at low > frequencies. > > Strangely enough the combination A-111(sawtooth)/A-113 causes no > problems. > > > > The reason is the negative slope of the A-111 rectangle ! Our > oscilloscope > > showed in high res mode (1us/div) that the negative slope is not a > single > > slope but has some ups and downs (a bit like a down-going triangle). > > Obviously the waveform converter inside the CEM3340 has this > behaviour as > > the rectangle output of the A-111 is nothing but the rectangle > output of the > > CEM3340 (only via 1k protection resistor and AC coupling > capacitor). In > > normal applications this causes no problems and cannot be heard > (each VCA or > > VCF or mixer behind the A-111 smoothes this multiple slopes which > are in the > > microsecond range). But the A-113 is very fast and detects these > multiple > > slopes at low frequencies. This causes the problems of the A-111/A- > 113 > > combination you described. > > > > There are several solutions for this problem: > > > > 1. Do not use the rectangle but e.g. the sawtooth output of the A- > 111 to > > trigger the A-113 (the sawtooth has no multiple slopes) > > 2. Process the rectangle output by any other module (VCA, VCF, > mixer) before > > it is used to trigger the A-113. > > 3. Add a capacitor to the A-113 (in parallel to diode D3). We tried > 2n2 and > > then the A-113 tracks perfect from about 10Hz. If you contact me > directly > > (hardware@...) I can send you a picture that shows the position of > D3 > > on the A-113 board. In this case even the rectangle output of the A- > 111 can > > be used to trigger the A-113. > > > > Best wishes > > Dieter Doepfer > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > > > [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von vliesgaard > > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. April 2006 12:35 > > > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > > > Betreff: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A-113 input sencetivity/tracking > problems > > > > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Dieter Doepfer" <hardware@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > OK, I'll check this with an A-111 and A-113. But it may take a > few days > > as > > > > we are very busy with testing and modifying the BBD modules as > the > > customers > > > > are waiting anxiously for their modules. > > > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > Dieter Doepfer > > > > > > > > > > Don't worry, you get the full 100 points for customer service. If > only > > > other company's were that good. > > > > > > > > > One use the A-113 is creating interesting rhythms. > > > E.g. if you divide the 16th notes of the sequenser, with the A- > 113, by > > > 2 3 5 and 7 you get a very complex rhythm patern. > > > Thats why it should track low frequenty's. > > > > > > Greetings Dirk > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
Message
AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A-113 input sencetivity/tracking problems
2006-05-08 by Dieter Doepfer
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.