Thanks for your comments. Pls let me know how do you like the A105 - Mini Wave combo! Regards, Ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate" <synaptic_music@...> wrote: > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "ilanode" <techmeier@> wrote: > > > > Hello, Since I gave the A105 a try out of curiosity I'm tempted to > get > > one. Pro: Incredible good job on bass patches. Con: based on an > > obsolete IC. From my *brief* experience I thought it works best > with > > square waveforms and is otherwise quite ordinary (I could be wrong). > > I'd like to know from other A105-experienced list members their > > opinion (por and con) about this filter. Sure, it's all a matter of > > taste so it might help to add that I like best the vactrol filters, > > A122 but hardly use the A124 and A120. Since the very chip is also > > used in some PPG synths I should add that I have some of the PPG > > waveforms for my Blacet Mini Wave. Thanks for any input, Ingo > > > > hello ingo, > > i like the a105 for it's stable resonance down to low frequencies, > for its accurate tracking and for the overall sound. > the self-oscillation is really nice, makes great bass sounds > on its own. from my point of view the only "con" is that > the maximum manual cutoff frequency is not that high, so if > you want to open the filter wide to get an entirely "unfiltered" > sound, you need to apply an additional control voltage in some > cases. but that is just a minor "con", the "pros" make up for > this easily. i have to confess that i haven't tried the > a105 with the blacet mini wave, maybe i should do this during > the next studio session :-) > > best wishes > > ingo >
Message
Re: Thoughts on A105 Filter (SSM2044 )
2006-06-21 by ilanode
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.